跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

computation-reviewer

Check whether numeric claims marked with Evidence aliases in an Artifact agree with the linked Evidence content and context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery星标 178(GitHub 178 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Computation Reviewer

Run on the same locked Artifact with its supplied Evidence Bundle. In the bounded Deep pipeline, this local Evidence comparison runs before Citation source verification.

Required checks

  1. Review exactly one supplied numeric Claim and its matching Evidence Bundle entry per run. The Claim must contain a number and an [evN] alias in the same sentence or Markdown table cell.
  2. Compare value, unit, range, sample size, population, subgroup, endpoint, and statistical context with the linked Evidence.
  3. Distinguish exact support, value or unit contradiction, scope mismatch, interpretation overreach, and insufficient evidence.
  4. Return INCONCLUSIVE when the Evidence excerpt does not contain enough context; do not report insufficient content as a value mismatch.

Output

Return only the required structured result. Use a concrete COMPUTATION_* finding code such as COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_VALUE_MISMATCH, COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_SCOPE_MISMATCH, COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_INTERPRETATION_OVERREACH, or COMPUTATION_EVIDENCE_INSUFFICIENT. Preserve the supplied Evidence alias and provide one concise reason; do not invent a separate correction field that the review protocol cannot persist.

Boundaries

  • Do not recompute results, execute code, modify Artifacts, or create another agent.
  • Do not treat topical similarity as numeric support.
  • Preserve Evidence aliases and provide a concise reason for every mismatch.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Prepare, launch, monitor, and summarize the real RFdiffusion to ProteinMPNN to Protenix antibody pipeline on a local or remote ScienceDiscovery Runner with sandboxed Ascend NPUs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

Independent multi-dimensional assessor for material design candidates. Loads configurable scoring rubrics to evaluate candidates from different expert perspectives. Each dispatch produces structured scores, pros/cons, and verification data without sharing results with other assessors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

ci

免费

Read, diagnose, and change the CI pipeline: GitHub Actions on pull requests, the merge queue, the nightly schedule and the release tag. Use when a job fails, when editing .github/workflows/, when asking which layer runs what, when reproducing a pipeline failure locally, or when a job needs the bubblewrap sandbox. Running the layers before proposing a change, and reading the result a proposal receives, belong to create-github-pr.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

Verify cited paper identity and decide whether claims in an Artifact are supported by their linked Evidence using a governed source snapshot.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

Use this skill when you need to write and execute Python/R code to process, transform, and analyze data, delivering reproducible computational results with complete code-level methodology documentation. Supports statistical analysis, data transformation, visualization, method justification, and structured result output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

Open or update a pull request on GitHub's openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery: run the UT/ST/E2E layers locally, push the branch to the operator's own GitHub fork, write a body that says what was verified with numbers, apply exactly one release:* label so the release note can classify it, then read the pull request and its Actions run back. Use when asked to create a PR, submit a change for review, when a branch is ready to propose, when labelling a pull request for the release note, or when reading a GitHub Actions result on a pull request. This is the only path for proposing a change: gitcode.com is a read-only mirror with no pipeline of its own. Titles and bodies are English. For filing an issue, or for the gh commands this procedure assumes, read the github skill first.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery1782026年10月26日 更新

查看 openJiuwen-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题