跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

critique-visual-hierarchy

Review a rendered screen to check what attracts attention first, how the eye moves, and which elements stand out. Get specific fixes and severity ratings for problems that hide important information or actions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Critique a rendered screen's hierarchy — entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis. Use when attention lands in the wrong place. For establishing hierarchy in new work, use `visual-hierarchy` (ui-design).

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Finding why a primary action gets overlooked
  • Reviewing the reading order of a screen
  • Resolving competing areas of emphasis
  • Checking whether decoration distracts from key content

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Critique Visual Hierarchy

You are an expert in visual hierarchy and screen-level design critique.

What You Do

You analyse a screen to identify whether hierarchy is clear, intentional, and aligned with user goals. You flag problems and suggest targeted fixes.

Critique Dimensions

Entry Point

The first element that captures the eye. Evaluate whether it is the most important thing on screen.

  • Is there a single dominant element, or does attention scatter?
  • Does size, contrast, or position establish the entry point clearly?
  • Does the entry point match the primary user goal for this screen?

Eye Flow

The path a user's eye travels after landing. Evaluate whether the path is deliberate and efficient.

  • Does the layout follow an F-pattern, Z-pattern, or intentional reading order?
  • Are there dead ends, loops, or confusing jumps?
  • Does flow lead naturally to the primary call-to-action?

Weight

The relative visual importance of each element. Evaluate whether weight is distributed purposefully.

  • Are size differentials at least 1.5× between hierarchy levels?
  • Is bold/heavy type used sparingly so it retains signal value?
  • Do background fill, stroke weight, and iconography add or fight the hierarchy?

Emphasis

Specific elements that demand extra attention. Evaluate whether emphasis is earned and singular.

  • Is there exactly one primary emphasis zone per view?
  • Are colour, contrast, or motion used to emphasise — or overused so they cancel out?
  • Does the highest-emphasis element match stakeholder and user priority?

Output Format

For each dimension — Entry Point, Eye Flow, Weight, Emphasis — provide:

  1. Observation — what you see (neutral, factual)
  2. Problem — what is broken and why it matters
  3. Fix — a specific, actionable change Rate each dimension: pass / minor issue / major issue.

Common Failure Patterns

  • Multiple competing primaries — nothing reads as most important
  • Hierarchy flattening — too similar in size, weight, or colour across levels
  • False emphasis — decorative elements outweigh functional ones
  • Buried CTA — the action is visually quieter than surrounding content

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Plan A/B experiments to measure the effect of a design change. Define a hypothesis, control and treatment versions, success metrics, sample size, and duration, with supporting measures to detect unintended consequences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning a comparison between current and proposed designs
  • Defining success metrics for a change
  • Estimating sample size and test duration
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

Assess an existing interface against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Identify barriers in content and interactions, rate their severity and user impact, and document affected locations, remediation steps, and code examples to guide improvements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing accessibility in an existing design or build
  • Checking keyboard access and assistive technology compatibility
  • Prioritizing fixes by severity and user impact
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

Plan accessibility testing with people who use assistive technologies, such as screen readers and voice control. Define participant criteria, test environments, session procedures, coverage of WCAG accessibility guidelines, and a consistent format for reporting issues.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning test sessions with assistive technology users
  • Defining participant recruitment criteria
  • Mapping key user flows to test environments
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

Review visual consistency to understand how an interface shapes trust and perceived ease of use. Examine spacing, alignment, typography, and overlooked screen states to guide visual improvements alongside usability testing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigating poor feedback on a functional interface
  • Checking visual consistency before launch
  • Reviewing error, empty, and loading states
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

Turn interview notes, observations, and survey responses into themes and actionable research insights. Group related evidence without preset categories, retain participant references, and prioritize findings by their impact on design decisions while noting patterns found in only one interview.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Synthesize findings across multiple interviews
  • Organize observation notes and survey responses
  • Prioritize research insights for design decisions
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

Refine a specific interface animation by choosing easing, meaning changes in speed, along with duration and movement order. Use it to tune buttons, modals, transitions, or loading indicators so motion guides attention and communicates changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Tune how a modal enters and exits
  • Adjust button and toggle animations
  • Coordinate the order of related movements
Owl-Listener/designer-skills30492026年9月6日 更新

查看 Owl-Listener 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题