跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

principle-boundary-discipline

Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Concentrate guards at system boundaries (CLI, config, network, external APIs); trust internal types and keep business logic in pure functions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Boundary Discipline

Place validation, type narrowing, and error handling at system boundaries. Trust internal code unconditionally. Business logic lives in pure functions; the shell is thin and mechanical.

Why: Scattered validation is noisy, redundant, and gives a false sense of safety. Validate data once at the boundary. Keep logic out of framework wiring so it can be tested without the framework.

The pattern:

  • At boundaries (CLI args, config files, external APIs, network protocols): validate, return errors, handle defensively.
  • Inside the system: typed data, error propagation, no re-validation. Trust the types.
  • Across the boundary. Expose domain concepts, not the boundary's private representation. Keep general-purpose mechanism inside and special-purpose policy at the edge.

Applications:

Validation and error handling:

  • Validate config at parse time (the boundary), not inside business logic
  • Parse raw data into domain types at the boundary
  • Do not re-export transport, storage, framework, or wire types through the public surface
  • No redundant nil checks deep in call chains if the boundary already validated

Code organization:

  • Business logic in pure functions with no framework dependencies
  • Parse functions: pure transforms from raw bytes to typed state
  • Prompt construction: structured state in, string out
  • Scoring and assessment: pure transforms from state to results

The tests:

  • "Is this data crossing a system boundary right now?" If not, validation is redundant.
  • "Can this be a pure function that the shell just calls?" If yes, extract it.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

architect

免费

Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

arena

免费

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

bro

免费

Use when the user asks to restate or explain the last message in plain, jargon-free language.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

painhardcore/pstack112026年10月16日 更新

查看 painhardcore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题