Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use correctness as the default lens. For large, risky, or requirement-heavy changes, add the standards and specification lenses in references/review-lenses.md. Keep each finding tied to its source; documented rules and acceptance criteria outrank personal preference.
Each finding must include:
Do not report style preferences, theoretical risks without a reachable path, or issues outside the change unless the diff materially exposes them.
Read references/review-checklist.md when the change touches APIs, data, authorization, concurrency, infrastructure, or tests.
If there are no actionable findings, say so directly and name residual unverified areas. Keep the summary shorter than the findings.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Build or modify backend APIs, services, jobs, persistence, and integrations while preserving contracts, authorization, data integrity, and failure behavior. Use for server-side features, database changes, background processing, backend defects, and service refactors; do not use for frontend-only or infrastructure-only work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build or modify frontend interfaces using repository-native components while preserving accessibility, responsive behavior, state handling, and visual verification. Use for UI features, design implementation, forms, client-side defects, and frontend refactors; do not use for backend-only or infrastructure-only work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Select the smallest useful Codex engineering workflow from this repository's existing skills. Use when a task spans multiple engineering concerns, the user is unsure which skill to invoke, or loading every specialist would waste context; return a recommendation only and do not execute the engineering task.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implement a repository code or configuration change through reproduction, focused checks, review, and evidence. Use for end-to-end features and fixes; not for explanation-only, review-only, research, content publishing, or production operations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review a small code or documentation change and return only evidence-backed correctness findings. Use in the Codex How To local plugin lab; do not modify files or post remote comments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows, check wiki health, reconcile conflicting guidance, or promote verified knowledge.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。