跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

epic-breakdown

Decompose large epics into sprint-ready sub-epics using 9 splitting patterns. Use this skill when: - A spec is approved and you need to break a large feature into estimable work items for engineering - You want to split an epic that is too large for a single sprint - You need sized sub-epics with story point estimates for sprint planning - You are preparing for engineering handoff and need to identify work packages

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB
  • references/splitting-patterns.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Epic Breakdown

Take a spec's Functional Requirements and Differences sections, apply 9 decomposition patterns to produce sized sub-epics ready for sprint planning.

Workflow

  1. Read spec from your spec directory
  2. List all functionality blocks and platform/user differences
  3. Evaluate which splitting patterns apply to each block
  4. Generate sub-epics with estimates
  5. Map dependencies between sub-epics
  6. Suggest sprint allocation
  7. Output to file or print

The 9 Splitting Patterns

#PatternWhen to Use
1Workflow StepsMulti-step flow (create -> configure -> publish)
2Business RulesComplex validation logic
3Data VariationsMultiple content types or input formats
4Platform DifferencesDifferent behavior across web/mobile/tablet/offline
5Operations (CRUD)Standard data management flow
6Spike/ResearchTechnical unknowns or third-party integrations
7PerformanceSpecific NFR targets
8Persona VariationsDifferent behavior per user role
9Happy Path vs Edge CasesFeature can deliver value with just happy path

See references/splitting-patterns.md for detailed examples of each pattern.

Story Point Guide

PointsComplexityExample
1Simple, no unknownsConfig change, copy update
2Small, minor complexityAdd a field, simple UI change
3Medium, some complexityNew API endpoint, form with validation
5Significant, multiple componentsNew screen with backend integration
8Large, cross-cuttingOffline sync, real-time updates
13Very large — SPLIT FURTHERUse the 9 patterns to decompose

If estimate > 8 points, attempt to split further using the patterns.

Output Format

# Epic Breakdown — {Feature Name}

**Source Spec:** {path}
**Date:** {DD-MM-YYYY}
**Total Sub-Epics:** {count}
**Total Estimated Points:** {sum}

---

## Sub-Epics

### SE-001: {Title}
**Pattern:** {which of the 9}
**Estimate:** {points} points
**Spec Section:** {reference}
**Description:** {what this delivers}
**Dependencies:** {SE-NNN or "None"}
**Acceptance Summary:** {key outcomes}

---

## Dependency Map

```mermaid
graph TD
  SE-001 --> SE-003
  SE-002 --> SE-003

Sprint Allocation

SprintSub-EpicsPointsTheme
Sprint 1SE-001, SE-002{n}Core happy path
Sprint 2SE-003, SE-004{n}Edge cases + offline

Summary

Pattern UsedCountTotal Points
Workflow Steps{n}{n}
Happy Path vs Edge{n}{n}

## Anti-Patterns

- Don't create sub-epics smaller than 1 point — group them
- Don't ignore dependencies — they determine sprint order
- Don't estimate > 13 points — split further instead
- Don't skip the dependency map — it prevents sprint planning surprises

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Every sub-epic has a clear pattern attribution
- [ ] All estimates are Fibonacci (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13)
- [ ] Dependencies are mapped
- [ ] Sprint allocation respects dependencies
- [ ] No sub-epic exceeds 8 points without a split rationale

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

qa-aman/claude-skills212026年10月19日 更新

查看 qa-aman 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题