Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Overview of six AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and p
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
⚠️ AUTHORIZED USE ONLY This skill is for educational purposes or authorized security assessments only. You must have explicit, written permission from the system owner before using this tool. Misuse of this tool is illegal and strictly prohibited.
Mandatory confirmation gate Before running any command that probes, exploits, changes, persists on, extracts data from, or attempts credential access against a target:
- Ask the user to state the exact target URL, IP, account, or resource.
- Ask the user to confirm written authorization and the permitted scope.
- Show the exact command(s) and explain their expected effect.
- Wait for explicit confirmation in the current conversation.
Without that confirmation, remain read-only and provide defensive guidance only. Prefer a sandbox, disposable VM, or controlled lab.
A collection of 6 structured, expert-level workflows that turn your AI coding assistant into a senior AI engineering partner. Each skill encodes a repeatable methodology — not just "ask AI to help," but a step-by-step decision framework with quantitative scoring, checklists, and decision trees.
The key difference from ad-hoc AI assistance: Scores and qualitative outputs can vary by evaluator, model and context; calibrate rubrics and record versions before making comparisons. You can use the scoring systems as team baselines and write them into CI/CD pipelines.
This AAS tree bundles this overview only; the six named workflow packages, 65 test cases and CI templates are not included here. Do not claim a 65-test run or a scored assessment without actual supplied rubric, cases, harness and recorded execution. The upstream collection is an optional separately reviewed source; its installation does not validate a production system.
A defined evaluator can score prompts across 8 dimensions (Clarity, Specificity, Completeness, Conciseness, Structure, Grounding, Safety, Robustness) on a 1-10 scale with weighted aggregation to a 0-100 score. Identifies the 3 weakest dimensions, generates targeted rewrites, and re-evaluates. Supports single prompt, A/B comparison, and batch evaluation modes.
Analyzes token distribution across 5 context zones (System, Few-shot, User input, Retrieval, Output) and produces an optimized allocation plan. Includes a compression strategy decision tree for each zone. Common finding: output zone squeezed to under 6% — this skill catches that before truncation happens.
Walks through a complete architecture decision tree: document format → parsing strategy → chunking approach (fixed/semantic/recursive) → embedding model selection → retrieval method (vector/keyword/hybrid) → evaluation metrics (Faithfulness, Relevancy, Context Precision). Covers Naive RAG, Advanced RAG, and Modular RAG patterns.
Executes a 65-point red-team audit across 5 attack categories: direct prompt injection, indirect prompt injection (via RAG documents), information extraction (system prompt / API key leakage), tool abuse (SQL injection, path traversal, command injection), and goal hijacking. The AI constructs adversarial test prompts for evaluation purposes, asks the user for confirmation before each test phase, judges pass/fail, and generates fix recommendations. All tests are contained within the evaluation context and do not interact with external systems. It is recommended to run audits in a sandboxed environment (Docker/VM).
Designs evaluation metric systems for LLM applications. Includes LLM-as-Judge scoring framework with bias mitigation strategies (position bias, verbosity bias, self-enhancement bias). Outputs CI/CD-ready evaluation pipeline templates.
A 5-phase guided conversation framework: dig into motivation → assess market opportunity → find the path → design scenarios → analyze competition. Useful for thinking through "should we build this?" before writing any code.
Ask: "Evaluate this system prompt"
You are a customer support agent. Help users with their questions. Be nice and helpful.
Illustrative response format, not a measured assessment: Overall score 28/100. Weakest dimensions: Safety (1/10, zero injection protection), Specificity (2/10, n
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Usar al iniciar o mejorar un proyecto de IA: diagnostica código y restricciones, propone skills existentes y redacta tareas y un plan de implementación en español.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Usar para crear o mejorar una skill de Andru.ia: define entradas y resultados, redacta SKILL.md con ejemplos y límites, valida la estructura y prepara una PR.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Usar tras definir el sector de un proyecto: prepara un dossier en español con contexto, normas aplicables, patrones UX y riesgos, distinguiendo fuentes verificadas de hipótesis.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use f
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。