跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

exec-summary

Produce a short executive summary for the current rolling-wave project. Use when the user wants a concise status update, investor/team-friendly summary, leadership summary, project progress snapshot, or TL;DR of completed slices, the current slice plan, and upcoming slices.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml255 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Exec Summary

Create a short executive summary of the current rolling-wave project.

Core Invariants

  • Work under docs/rolling-wave/{project}/.
  • Read project-level state from project.md; read slices from slices/NNN-slug.md.
  • Use slice statuses: pending, ready, in progress, ready for review, in review, done.
  • Treat the roadmap in project.md as the planned sequence.
  • This is read-only. Do not edit project or slice files.
  • Keep output concise and executive-friendly. Do not include planning-process caveats, file visibility notes, or test warnings unless directly relevant to the status.

Workflow

  1. Resolve the project.

    • If the user names a project, use docs/rolling-wave/{project}/.
    • If only one project exists under docs/rolling-wave/, use it.
    • If multiple projects exist and no project is named, ask which project to summarize.
    • If no rolling-wave project exists, say so plainly.
  2. Read status.

    • Read project.md.
    • Read slice files under slices/.
    • If a slice references a child rolling-wave project, read the child project.md only enough to summarize child status and current child slice.
    • Prefer slice file frontmatter for status when present.
    • Use the roadmap table in project.md for ordering and one-line purpose.
  3. Identify the current slice.

    • Prefer a slice with status in progress.
    • Else use in review.
    • Else use ready for review.
    • Else use ready.
    • Else use the first non-done roadmap slice.
    • If no unfinished slices remain, say the roadmap appears complete.
  4. Summarize.

    • Slices overview: use a markdown table with status and name columns in roadmap order.
      • Show each slice's exact status; do not reduce status to completed or incomplete.
      • For child-project-backed slices, append -> {child-project}: {child-status} or a similarly terse child-project marker to the name cell.
      • Include slice id/name and a short outcome- or purpose-oriented phrase in the name cell.
    • Current slice TL;DR: summarize the current slice plan in one to three bullets from its purpose, behavior, acceptance criteria, expected intermediate state, risks, and implementation notes.
    • Upcoming: include upcoming slices in the same table rather than a separate plain bullet list.
    • Include material project-level risks or review notes only if they affect leadership understanding of progress or next steps.

Output

Use this shape:

- Slices:
  
  | status | name |
  | --- | --- |
  | done | 001-...: ... |
  | in progress | 002-...: ... |
  | pending | 003-...: ... |
- Current slice:
  - ...

Keep the whole answer short. If there is nothing in a section, write none for that section.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

Review changed code for YAGNI, removable over-complexity, reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then apply worthwhile simplifications. Use when the user asks to simplify, clean up, tighten, de-hack recent changes, identify logic that can be dropped, or review whether added safeguards and edge-case handling are actually needed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

Mark a rolling-wave slice done on explicit user authority, regardless of its current lifecycle status or missing implementation, finalization, review, verification, or child-project state. Use when the user says a slice is done, complete, finished, accepted, or should be marked done; capture available material learnings, update project state, and output roadmap progress without requiring earlier workflow steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

debug

免费

Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

Implement and finalize one ready rolling-wave slice in one invocation while preserving the lifecycle boundary between implementation and independent review. Use when the user wants a slice delivered end to end without manually invoking implement-slice and finalize-slice, wants main-local implementation by default with workers only when delegation pays, followed by mandatory fresh-context finalization, or says deliver, implement and finalize, or take the slice through review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

Finalize an implemented rolling-wave slice for user review. Use when the user wants Codex to review the current branch state against a ready-for-review or in-review slice contract, confirm and fix required findings, repeat review and verification until no required findings remain, ask before accepting findings that materially change project shape or contradict project assumptions, record review state, and leave the clean slice in review for complete-slice.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rijkvanzanten/rolling-wave-engineering132026年8月18日 更新

查看 rijkvanzanten 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题