跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

omh-app-debugging

[omh] Application code misbehaves -- a wrong value, a flaky test, a lost update: reproduce it first, form competing hypotheses, discriminate them with the cheapest observation, and only then fix the demonstrated root cause. Use when the user says: app-debugging, app debugging, application debugging, root cause, root-cause, find the root cause, root cause analysis, flaky test.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • references/debugging-skill-composition.md2.0 KB
  • references/hypothesis-and-race-method.md8.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

App Debugging

This is a Hermes-native app-debugging workflow skill.

Why This Exists

app-debugging exists because a wrong result in application code had no owner: native-debugging covers native binaries, build-failure-triage covers red builds, and agent-debug covers agent misbehaviour, so the most common debugging request dispatched straight to an execution lane that skipped the diagnosis.

First Steps

  • Ask for, or plan, the one command that shows the wrong behaviour, and record its observed output before naming a cause.
  • Refuse to prepare a fix while the reproduction reads not_observed; plan the observation that would establish it instead.

Do Not Use When

  • The fault is a crash, memory corruption, or core dump in a compiled native binary that needs a debugger session; use omh-native-debugging.
  • The build, compile, or CI job fails the same way on every run; use omh-build-failure-triage.
  • The subject is an agent or workflow run that misbehaved rather than the application code; use omh-agent-debug.
  • The cause is already demonstrated and the request is to judge whether the fix is proven; use omh-verification-gate.
  • Hermes' bundled systematic-debugging skill is already loaded for this bug; follow its phases instead of loading this one too, unless the reproduction, the rival hypotheses, and the observation that separated them must be kept as a record.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: a test fails one run in five in CI, how do I find out why
  • Expected behavior: Prepare reproduction_record/v1 with the loop that measures the failure rate, competing_hypotheses/v1 across ordering, shared state, timing, and environment, and the cheapest observation that splits them; no fix yet.
  • Why: The failure is intermittent, so the first deliverable is a measured reproduction rather than a patch.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: add a sleep before the assertion so the flaky test passes
  • Expected behavior: Record the sleep as a symptom mask, keep root cause open, and plan the observation that names the race.
  • Why: A timing change that hides the failure leaves the fault in place and removes the reproduction.

Completion Checklist

  • The reproduction names its command, observed output, expected output, and hit rate, and reads observed before any fix is prepared.
  • At least three hypotheses on distinct axes were written before the first observation was chosen.
  • Each observation records which hypotheses its result eliminated.
  • The root cause cites the demonstrating observation and the observation that ruled out each rival.
  • The fix handoff carries the reproduction as a regression test that fails before and passes after.

Recovery Notes

  • If the fault does not reproduce, make reproduction the first hypothesis and plan the loop, seed, or ordering that would establish it.
  • If every hypothesis is eliminated, record that, widen the axes, and keep root cause unclaimed rather than promoting the last survivor.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Coding handoff (idea-to-deploy, llm-app-dev, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, +28 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when application code -- a Python, TypeScript, Go, or JVM service, library, or test -- behaves wrongly and the cause is unknown: a wrong value, an intermittent or order-dependent test, a race or lost update, or a bug that moves when observed. The work is a demonstrated root cause: an observed reproduction, competing hypotheses, the cheapest observation that separates them, and only then a fix.

Strong routing signals: `app-debugging`, `app debugging`, `application debugging`, `root cause`, `root-cause`, `find the root cause`, `root cause analysis`, `flaky test`, `flaky tests`, `test is flaky`, `intermittent test failure`, `fails intermittently`, `fails one run in`, `passes locally but fails in ci`, `heisenbug`, `bug disappears`, `disappears when i add a print`, `race condition`, `lost update`, `update is lost`, `wrong return value`, `returns the wrong value`, `reproduce the bug`, `minimal reproduction`

Catalog Metadata

Category: verification Phase: app-root-cause Hermes role: reviewer Quality tier: root-cause-evidence-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • State the symptom and the expected behaviour separately from any suspected cause.
  • Record the reproduction with its hit rate; an intermittent fault is reproduced when its rate over N runs is measured, not when it happened once.
  • Load references/hypothesis-and-race-method.md for the hypothesis table, flaky-test tactics, and race patterns instead of improvising them.
  • Pick the next observation by cost and by how many hypotheses its result eliminates, and record the eliminations.
  • Keep reproduction, root cause, fix, and verification as separate observed states.
  • Count a fix as failed when an executed run of the same reproduction command still shows the original symptom or shows a new symptom the fix caused rather than unmasked; planned runs and other commands do not count. After the third failed fix, prepare no fourth; re-examine the architecture assumptions every fix shared, per the method reference, and offer the user the next step as a question.
  • When Hermes' bundled systematic-debugging skill is loaded for the same bug, follow its phases and write this skill's records at each; a breakpoint read through python-debugpy or node-inspect-debugger is one discriminating observation. Load references/debugging-skill-composition.md for the mapping.

Handoff policy:

Keep the symptom statement, the hypothesis set, the discriminating observations, and the root-cause verdict in Hermes. Record every reproduction run, probe output, and fix verification only from executor or wrapper observed evidence.

Required inputs:

  • the wrong behaviour as observed, and the behaviour that was expected
  • the command, request, or test that shows it, and how often it shows it
  • language, framework, and what changed recently when known
  • logs, stack traces, or failing assertions already captured
  • observed reproduction and verification evidence for any root-cause or fix claim

Expected outputs:

  • reproduction_record/v1
  • competing_hypotheses/v1 with at least three hypotheses on distinct axes
  • discriminating_observation_plan/v1
  • root_cause_record/v1
  • fix_handoff/v1 blocked until reproduction_record/v1 reads observed
  • observed_fix_verification/v1 when observed

Artifact expectations:

  • reproduction_record/v1 names the exact command, the input, the observed output, the expected output, and the hit rate over N runs; it reads observed or not_observed and nothing between
  • competing_hypotheses/v1 spans distinct axes -- input and state, ordering and timing, environment and build, dependency behaviour -- rather than three phrasings of one guess
  • discriminating_observation_plan/v1 orders the observations cheapest first and names, for each, which hypotheses its result eliminates
  • root_cause_record/v1 cites the observation that demonstrated the cause and the one that ruled out each rival
  • fix_handoff/v1 carries the reproduction as the regression test that must fail before the fix and pass after it

Safety rules:

  • No fix before an observed reproduction: fix_handoff/v1 stays blocked while reproduction_record/v1 reads not_observed, and a proposed change without one is a guess, not a fix.
  • Do not claim a reproduction, a probe result, a root cause, or a passing fix from a prepared plan.
  • Require at least three hypotheses on distinct axes before planning observations; one hypothesis makes every reading confirmatory.
  • Never treat a symptom's disappearance as a root cause; a bug that stops after a print statement, a retry, or a sleep is an open timing fault.
  • Do not execute tests, debuggers, or commands from OMH core; the executor runs them and the record takes only what it observed.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: coding-handling.

omh runtime record --skill app-debugging --harness coding-handling --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Onboard a new model generation or sibling into oh-my-hermes: probe router recognition, research the official contract, write trait-to-counter calibration, place routing in both lanes, price from documented list only, gate machine config on a served route, prove with the gates, close with a benchmark pair. Use when a model family ships a new generation (for example "Fable 5.1 is out", "GLM 5.4 shipped", "onboard new model", "add model to chains").

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

[omh] Screen-reader or keyboard accessibility gaps: prepare WCAG, keyboard, focus, screen-reader, target-size, and reflow evidence gates for UI surfaces. Use when the user says: accessibility-audit, accessibility audit, a11y audit, a11y architect, wcag audit, wcag 2.2, wcag 2.2 aa, accessibility pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

[omh] Hermes badges unlocked and achievement progress: achievements observation: summarize hermes-achievements badges, tiers, recent unlocks, and progress from local plugin artifacts. Use when the user says: achievements, achievement, badges, badge, my badges, show achievements, achievement summary, unlocked badges.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

[omh] Coordinating several agents or profiles: coordinate multiple Hermes profiles or agents with task, handoff, heartbeat, blocker, and completion states. Use when the user says: agent-board, agent board, kanban, multi-agent, multi agent, multi agent board, multiple hermes agents, multiple hermes profiles.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

[omh] Agent is stuck, looping, or drifting: capture a stuck, looping, drifting, or repeatedly failing agent run, diagnose the likely failure pattern, and prepare the smallest safe recovery action. Use when the user says: agent-debug, agent debug, agent debugging, agent introspection, agent self-debug, self-debug, self debugging, looping agent.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rlaope/oh-my-hermes34842026年10月20日 更新

查看 rlaope 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题