跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

omh-content-operator

Plan product and company writing, rewrites, summaries, and translations by defining the audience, tone, sources, and review steps. The workflow clarifies missing facts and approval needs before content is treated as ready to publish.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

[omh] Product or company copy to publish or rewrite: scope publish-ready writing, rewriting, summarization, translation, release-note, newsletter, customer-copy, social-copy, README-copy, and email-draft work with audience, tone, style, source, review, and hallucination gates. Use when the user says: content-operator, content operator, content workflow, writing workflow, publish-ready writing, publish ready writing, release notes, release note draft.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Plan release notes for a specific audience
  • Define review steps for customer announcements
  • Scope newsletter and social post drafts
  • Set tone and source requirements for translations

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Content Operator

This is a Hermes-native content-operator workflow skill.

Why This Exists

content-operator exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and get a structured, checkable answer instead of an improvised one.

Do Not Use When

  • The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
  • The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
  • The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
  • The user wants a draft to stop sounding machine-written - strip AI tells or match their own voice - with no audience, source, or review gate to scope; load Hermes' bundled humanizer skill instead of this one.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: content-operator draft publish-ready release notes with audience, tone, source scope, review gates, and hallucination checks.
  • Expected behavior: Produce prepare_content_operator_card with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
  • Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: content-operator invent missing facts and claim the customer announcement was sent.
  • Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
  • Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.

Completion Checklist

  • Audience, channel, language, tone, style guide, length, source scope, fact-risk, review owner, and stop condition are explicit.
  • Missing facts, source gaps, claims needing citations, legal/compliance needs, approval, publish/send authority, and file-export needs are gated or marked missing.
  • Published, sent, exported, approved, and fact-verified claims are reported only from observed evidence.

Recovery Notes

  • If the request asks for citations, current facts, or source-backed evidence gathering, route to research or source-finder before drafting.
  • If the request asks to send, post, invite, ticket, or mutate an external app, route to connector-operator before claiming delivery.
  • If the request asks for PDF, PPT, DOCX, HWP, spreadsheet, or attachment packaging, route to materials-package or deliverable-package.
  • If the request is a simple one-off sentence or paragraph transformation, answer directly instead of opening a workflow.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Materials and visual summaries (show-reel, design-orchestration, apple-design, design-quality-gate, award-bar-score, frontend, accessibility-audit, visual-qa, +7 more) - web, accessibility, visual QA, files, and packages.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when Hermes should prepare or supervise quality-controlled content creation or transformation without claiming source access, fact verification, stakeholder approval, publishing, sending, file export, or delivery.

Strong routing signals: `content-operator`, `content operator`, `content workflow`, `writing workflow`, `publish-ready writing`, `publish ready writing`, `release notes`, `release note draft`, `newsletter draft`, `customer announcement`, `customer copy`, `product copy`, `landing page copy`, `social post draft`, `email draft`, `draft an email`, `rewrite for executives`, `summarize for customers`, `style guide rewrite`, `audience and tone`, `tone of voice`, `콘텐츠 오퍼레이터`, `글쓰기 워크플로`, `릴리즈 노트`, `릴리즈노트`, `뉴스레터 초안`, `고객 공지문`, `고객 공지`, `고객용 요약`, `메일 초안`, `이메일 초안`, `채널별 톤`, `문체 가이드`

Catalog Metadata

Category: content Phase: content-task Hermes role: guide Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
  • Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
  • Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.

Handoff policy:

Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.

Required inputs:

  • user request
  • target context
  • delivery or status expectation
  • known missing evidence

Expected outputs:

  • content_task_card/v1
  • source_scope/v1
  • audience_tone_style/v1
  • content_review_gate/v1
  • content_output_manifest/v1 when observed
  • next action
  • prepared-vs-observed boundary

Artifact expectations:

  • content_task_card/v1 metadata-only wrapper card when prepared
  • source_scope/v1 with supplied sources, missing sources, fact-risk, citation need, and no-invention rule
  • audience_tone_style/v1 with audience, channel, language, tone, style guide, length, format, and accessibility constraints
  • content_review_gate/v1 separating draft, reviewer approval, legal/compliance needs, publish/send/file-export authority, and stop condition
  • content_output_manifest/v1 only when produced draft, revision diff, approval, export, publish, or delivery evidence is observed

Safety rules:

  • A content operator card is not source retrieval, fact verification, hallucination-free copy, stakeholder approval, publishing, email/message sending, file export, delivery, or proof that final copy was accepted unless observed content output evidence records it.
  • Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: content-operator.

omh runtime record --skill content-operator --harness content-operator --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

dag-ulw

免费

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35712026年10月22日 更新

查看 rlaope 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题