Legal Compliance Review

This is a Hermes-native legal-compliance-review workflow skill.

Why This Exists

legal-compliance-review prepares scoped issues for human legal review without claiming counsel or filing authority.

Do Not Use When

• The user needs a final jurisdiction-specific legal opinion, legal representation, or authoritative filing decision; prepare the issue and counsel brief instead.
• The review is about code, secrets, permissions, prompt injection, dependencies, or unsafe tool behavior; use omh-security-safety-review.
• The request is a plain-language rewrite without a legal-risk review objective; use omh-content-operator.
• The user asks to sign, accept, submit, file, publish, or change a policy or contract in an external system; use omh-apps only after explicit authority.
• Redact the PII in the file itself and scan it before sending it, once sharing it is cleared; use omh-data-share-review.

Examples

Good example:

• Prompt: Review this vendor DPA for data-processing obligations, risky clauses, and questions for counsel.
• Expected behavior: Prepare an authority-bound issue matrix, ranked risks, and counsel questions.
• Why: The request needs a prepared review and escalation aid before a legal decision.

Bad example:

• Prompt: Audit this OAuth integration for secret and permission risks.
• Expected behavior: Route to security-safety-review, not legal-compliance-review.
• Why: The target is technical security risk rather than contract or compliance analysis.

Completion Checklist

• Findings or no-issue results are grounded in concrete file, artifact, command, or source evidence.
• Open questions, residual risk, and missing verification are named.
• Fixes or follow-up work are separate handoffs unless the user explicitly asked to implement them.

Recovery Notes

• If the reviewed target is missing, inspect the requested artifact or ask one target question.
• If independent verification is unavailable, report the gap and avoid an approval-style claim.

Workflow Lane

• Current lane: Research and company ops (product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, model-optimization, inference-serving, model-finetuning, research-brief, +26 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
• If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
• Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when supplied contract, policy, product, process, or regulatory context needs a scoped issue matrix, assumptions, and counsel/escalation brief.

Strong routing signals: `contract review`, `contract liability clause`, `regulatory analysis`, `compliance review`, `contract redline`, `redline the contract`, `negotiation preparation`, `negotiation strategy`, `clause language`, `counterparty position`, `계약서 검토`, `규제 분석`, `컴플라이언스 검토`

Catalog Metadata

Category: review Phase: legal-compliance-review Hermes role: reviewer Quality tier: review-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

• Name jurisdiction, authority, document version, and unresolved questions.
• Rank issues and preserve the counsel-escalation boundary.
• For a redline objective, tie every proposed clause to the playbook position it came from and carry its fallback and walk-away, so the negotiator sees what is being traded; an open counsel hold on a clause blocks its row rather than producing a proposal — load references/negotiation-preparation.md for the row shape and the concession-order rules.

Handoff policy:

Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. The result is a prepared review and escalation aid, not legal advice, counsel sign-off, compliance certification, contract execution, filing, or regulator communication.

Required inputs:

• jurisdiction
• document or process version
• supplied authority
• review objective

Expert clarification questions:

• jurisdiction
  • English: Which parties, actor or data roles, operative facts, governing law and forum, and separately applicable regulatory jurisdictions are supplied?
  • Korean: 어떤 당사자, 행위자 또는 데이터 역할, 주요 사실, 준거법과 관할, 별도 적용 규제 관할권이 제공되었나요?

Expected outputs:

• legal_scope_authority_record/v1
• legal_issue_traceability_matrix/v1
• legal_risk_counsel_hold_register/v1
• legal_negotiation_preparation/v1 when the objective is a redline rather than an assessment
• legal_review_disposition/v1

Artifact expectations:

• prepared legal and compliance issue matrix when a wrapper captures it
• legal_negotiation_preparation/v1 with one row per contested clause: the playbook position it came from, the proposed language, the fallback, and the walk-away, plus the concession order across rows

Safety rules:

• Distinguish supplied authority from legal interpretation and final advice.
• Do not claim sign-off, certification, filing, execution, or regulator communication.
• Proposed clause language is preparation material for the person who will negotiate, never advice about whether to accept it; a row whose playbook position cannot be cited is a counsel question, not a proposal.

Procedure: load references/procedure.md.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: critic.

omh runtime record --skill legal-compliance-review --harness critic --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

• Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.