跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

omh-todo-checklist

Resume previously agreed work from conversation context and track progress with a visible checklist. Keep one step active, preserve rejected ideas, distinguish blockers from user deferrals, and report completion only within the available evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

[omh] Resume or finish the work we agreed on: continue or finish the accepted work from conversation context, preserve rejected ideas, and report evidence-bounded completion. Also declare and advance the metadata-only plan checklist without starting a delivery engine. Use when the user says: todo-checklist, plan checklist, todo checklist, phase checklist, declare a plan checklist, declare the plan todo, show the plan todo, clear the plan todo.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Resuming previously agreed work
  • Displaying progress across multiple conversation turns
  • Recording blockers and user-requested deferrals
  • Separating completion status from verification evidence

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • references/checklist-discipline.md7.2 KB
  • references/closing-a-story.md9.6 KB
  • references/requirements-quality-checklist.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Todo Checklist

This is a Hermes-native todo-checklist workflow skill.

Why This Exists

todo-checklist exists because omh_todo is registered on every session while nothing in the skill surface named it: a user who wanted a plan checklist searched for one and found no skill on the subject. The delivery engines declare a checklist as part of starting work, which serves someone running an engine and nobody else.

Do Not Use When

  • The work is one step, already finished, or answerable in this turn; a checklist that never advances is a panel of noise.
  • The user wants an accepted implementation plan split into parallel lanes with owners and verification commands; use ulw-work.
  • The user wants the planning content itself -- options, risks, acceptance criteria before execution; use ulw-plan.
  • The user is asking what coding work is running right now rather than what the plan says; use omh-running-work-board.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: declare a plan checklist for this migration so I can see where you are
  • Expected behavior: Declare numbered phases in delivery order with one task per observable outcome, exactly one active, and update states as work completes.
  • Why: The user wants the HUD checklist itself, for work that spans turns, without starting a delivery engine.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: add a TODO comment above this function
  • Expected behavior: Edit the code; the plan todo panel has nothing to do with a source comment.
  • Why: todo is an everyday word in a coding session and this use of it is not a plan checklist.

Completion Checklist

  • Exactly one item is active, or the list is complete and every item is done.
  • The steps live in one tool; the same list is never written to both todo_list and omh_todo.
  • Use action=advance or a complete action=set list; never drop an item by omission.
  • Item states are described as declarations; observed results are cited separately or named as missing.
  • Name whether work is blocked or human-deferred.

Recovery Notes

  • After a partial action=set, resend every item; use action=advance for state changes.
  • If the panel shows nothing, read the current projection with action=show before re-declaring, so an existing checklist is not overwritten.
  • If the user redirects the session away from the plan, record that on the write rather than deleting the checklist or marking its items done.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Automation and status (achievements, workspace-audit, production-audit, live-incident-response, automation-blueprint, github-event-ops, github-issue-intake, buzz, +40 more) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when the user wants a declared, HUD-visible plan checklist for the work at hand, or wants to read, advance, or clear one, without starting a delivery engine. Also use when the person asks in ordinary language to finish or resume the previously accepted work; infer intent from conversation, not isolated keywords.

Strong routing signals: `todo-checklist`, `$todo`, `plan checklist`, `todo checklist`, `phase checklist`, `declare a plan checklist`, `declare the plan todo`, `show the plan todo`, `clear the plan todo`

Catalog Metadata

Category: operator Phase: observability Hermes role: tracker Quality tier: evidence-gated Reasoning demand: light

Quality bar:

  • A done item is a declaration, never observed evidence.
  • With todo_list holding the steps, mark states there and call omh_todo only for what it alone records; a native completed is judged against recorded commands exactly like done, and cancelled reads as skipped.
  • For accepted multi-turn work, load references/closing-a-story.md before checkpoint, recall, explicit resume or recording verification/review/QA declarations. Preserve rejected ideas separately; templates remain optional.
  • Current intent overrides old plans. Stop, analysis-only and topic changes take precedence; ask only when scope is ambiguous. Missing, stale or malformed evidence is not clean; waiting for a child remains open.
  • Keep exactly one item active so the HUD names the current step.
  • Use action=advance with item number, text-prefix guard and new state. action=set replaces the whole list: send every item or omitted ones are lost.
  • The live checklist is session-owned; another TUI, Slack or Discord session cannot see or overwrite it.
  • Load references/checklist-discipline.md: blocked_reason is an item unable to proceed; deferred_reason on the write is human redirection. Do not interchange them.
  • For spec fitness, load references/requirements-quality-checklist.md; its generator may not tick its items.
  • Before closing, read references/closing-a-story.md, not just ticks: done with blocked_reason means skipped; OMH never observes landing.

Handoff policy:

Keep the steps in ONE tool, never both: a planning run, an accepted plan or a code-story template keeps them in omh_todo; otherwise todo_list holds them when todo_list is in your tool list or tool_search finds it, and OMH mirrors each write into this plan todo, else omh_todo. omh_todo alone holds plan_stage, checkpoint/record/recall, blocked_reason and deferred_reason. A checklist item is a plan declaration and never dispatches, executes, or verifies anything.

Required inputs:

  • the work to be tracked

Expected outputs:

  • a declared checklist with exactly one active item
  • explicit states as work completes

Artifact expectations:

  • metadata-only omh_todo/v1 plan todo owned by the declaring session

Safety rules:

  • Checklist states never prove execution, verification, review, CI or merge.
  • Do not declare a checklist for one-step, finished or directly answerable work.

Runtime Evidence

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

dag-ulw

免费

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35812026年10月23日 更新

查看 rlaope 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题