跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

omh-toolbelt-readiness

Identify the MCP servers, command-line tools, API credentials, and connectors a workflow needs before work starts. The skill lists what is present, missing, optional, or unsafe and identifies the next setup or verification step.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

[omh] Which tools and credentials a workflow needs: inventory which MCP servers, CLIs, APIs, credentials, and connectors a workflow needs; use external-connector-readiness to assess one named integration. Use when the user says: toolbelt-readiness, mcp readiness, tool readiness, plugin readiness, connector readiness, needed mcp, api credential, missing cli.

集成工具Gmail

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Listing tools needed for a planned workflow
  • Preparing weekly Linear and GitHub triage
  • Checking missing CLIs and API credentials
  • Separating required and optional integrations

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Toolbelt Readiness

This is an OMH toolbelt-readiness workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

Why This Exists

toolbelt-readiness exists so the tools, CLIs, credentials, and connectors a workflow needs are listed as present, missing, optional, or unsafe before the work starts, instead of failing midway on a tool nobody checked.

Do Not Use When

  • One named integration needs assessing end to end before adoption; use omh-external-connector-readiness.
  • The question is which coding owner should run the work.
  • The user wants a tool installed, a credential validated, or a connector called now; the card names that step and who runs it, and performs none of them.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: toolbelt-readiness what MCP or CLI tools do I need for weekly Linear and GitHub triage?
  • Expected behavior: Produce prepare_toolbelt_readiness with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
  • Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: toolbelt-readiness claim Gmail access works without an observed credential check.
  • Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
  • Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.

Completion Checklist

  • Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
  • Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
  • Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.

Recovery Notes

  • If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
  • If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.

When to Use

Use when a workflow depends on MCP, CLI, API credentials, or connectors and Hermes must show installed, missing, optional, and unsafe tools.

Strong routing signals: `toolbelt-readiness`, `mcp readiness`, `tool readiness`, `plugin readiness`, `connector readiness`, `needed mcp`, `api credential`, `missing cli`, `missing plugin`, `missing connector`, `external connector`, `external tool`, `mcp server`, `mcp servers`, `mcp tool`, `mcp tools`, `toolbelt`, `github cli`, `linear cli`, `jira cli`, `notion connector`, `google drive connector`, `gmail connector`, `slack api`, `browser tool`, `image generator connector`, `mcp`, `credential`, `외부 도구`, `외부 연결`, `커넥터`, `플러그인`, `자격증명`

Catalog Metadata

Category: tools Phase: readiness-check Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
  • Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
  • Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
  • On Hermes, count a native tool as present when it is in your tool list or tool_search finds it: a tool deferred behind tool_search is reached through tool_call and is never listed as missing, and a Hermes version number never decides presence. Present is not authorized or working.

Required inputs:

  • user request
  • target context
  • delivery or status expectation
  • known missing evidence

Expected outputs:

  • toolbelt-readiness/v1 card or guidance
  • next action
  • prepared-vs-observed boundary

Artifact expectations:

  • toolbelt-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded

Safety rules:

  • A toolbelt readiness card is not MCP server installation, credential validation, API access, connector invocation, or successful workflow execution evidence.
  • Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.

Runtime Evidence

Use the current host's own tools and subagent/task mechanism when available; otherwise run the same lanes sequentially or name the unavailable capability. A prepared plan, handoff, checklist, or skill installation is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. Record actual tool results, or not_observed / not_available, in the record; never invent dispatch or host accounting. Treat supplied context as advisory, not proof of hidden memory reads or writes. State scope, constraints, verification, and the stop condition before work. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: the host's persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue. Supporting paths are relative to this skill directory; sibling skill paths are relative to its parent. Resolve them from the host-provided skill base directory ({baseDir} on hosts that provide it), never a hardcoded install location. A named workflow not installed here is unavailable, not permission to emulate its host-specific capabilities. Verify through the real surface before done.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

dag-ulw

免费

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35972026年10月23日 更新

查看 rlaope 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题