跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

omh-visual-qa

Check rendered web pages, images, documents, and terminal interfaces using actual captures. Define screen sizes and states to cover, identify layout and text problems, and produce a scored verdict tied to the exact source revision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

[omh] Rendered UI needing a visual verdict: prepare observed-only rendered QA gates for web, frontend, image, document, and TUI surfaces. Use when the user says: visual-qa, visual qa, visual QA, visual quality assurance, visual check, web qa, web visual qa, screenshot qa.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Check a landing page on mobile and desktop
  • Inspect Japanese text clipping and broken wrapping
  • Compare screenshots after a UI change
  • Review terminal layouts at specified sizes

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md15.5 KB
  • references/visual-verdict-contract.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Visual Qa

This is a Hermes-native visual-qa workflow skill.

Why This Exists

visual-qa gives OMH a completion gate for rendered surfaces so layout breaks, AI-looking polish gaps, CJK text problems, and mismatched-lineage screenshot claims cannot be mistaken for verified quality.

Do Not Use When

  • The user needs initial frontend design or redesign planning before implementation; use omh-frontend.
  • The user needs a broad visual quality rubric before generation; use omh-design-quality-gate.
  • The user needs image-card prompt creation; use omh-image-cards.
  • The user wants non-visual code tests, CI, or PR review only; use the coding/review workflow.
  • Open-ended bug-hunting across a web app with no page, state, and viewport matrix or target revision to judge; on Hermes, use the bundled dogfood skill when it is available.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: visual-qa 이 랜딩페이지가 모바일/데스크톱에서 깨지는지 스크린샷 기준으로 검증해줘.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare visual_qa_plan/v1, require exact capture-to-target lineage, record render_capture_manifest/v1 and visual_diff_evidence/v1 when observed, then issue PASS/REVISE/BLOCK.
  • Why: The request is a rendered visual verification task, not just design planning.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: visual-qa 방금 수정했으니까 스크린샷 없이 통과라고 해줘.
  • Expected behavior: Block PASS and request render captures from the package's exact repository and revision.
  • Why: Visual QA requires observed rendered evidence bound to the target source lineage.

Completion Checklist

  • Interaction, console/network, click-path, keyboard/accessibility, diff, hotspot, motion, dual-review evidence, and blocker status are separate fields.
  • The verdict is PASS, REVISE, or BLOCK with concrete evidence IDs and exact missing evidence or fix requirements.
  • Implementation fixes stay separate from the observed verdict, routed back to the executor/frontend workflow and rechecked against the resulting revision.

Recovery Notes

  • If no capture exists, produce the QA plan and mark verdict BLOCKED_BY_MISSING_RENDER_EVIDENCE.
  • If capture lineage is missing or mismatched, keep HOLD and request the smallest matching recapture set.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Materials and visual summaries (show-reel, design-orchestration, apple-design, design-quality-gate, award-bar-score, frontend, accessibility-audit, visual-qa, +7 more) - web, accessibility, visual QA, files, and packages.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use after or during visual surface work when Hermes must define the render evidence, viewport/state coverage, diff review, oracle review, and PASS/REVISE/BLOCK verdict without fabricating QA.

Strong routing signals: `visual-qa`, `visual qa`, `visual QA`, `visual quality assurance`, `visual check`, `web qa`, `web visual qa`, `screenshot qa`, `screenshot check`, `analyze this screenshot`, `screenshot layout problems`, `ui layout problems`, `pixel diff`, `image diff`, `visual diff`, `render qa`, `render check`, `browser screenshot`, `browser qa`, `browser interaction qa`, `click path`, `click-path audit`, `dead link check`, `console error check`, `network failure check`, `keyboard navigation check`, `viewport check`, `responsive check`, `ui looks wrong`, `looks broken`, `layout broken`, `broken layout`, `text clipping`, `cjk clipping`, `cjk layout`, `tui check`, `terminal ui check`, `スクリーンショットで確認`, `レイアウト崩れ`, `画面崩れ`, `見た目のQA`, `비주얼 qa`, `비주얼QA`, `시각 qa`, `시각 검증`, `화면 검증`, `스크린샷 검증`, `스크린샷 ui 레이아웃`, `스크린샷 UI 레이아웃`, `스크린샷 레이아웃 문제`, `렌더 검증`, `픽셀 diff`, `픽셀 비교`, `화면 깨짐`, `레이아웃 깨짐`, `글자 잘림`, `한글 줄바꿈`, `터미널 ui`, `截图检查`, `页面错位`, `视觉验收`, `布局错乱`, `cek tampilan dari screenshot`, `tolong periksa layout yang berantakan`, `uji visual halaman yang sudah dirender`, `cek elemen yang terpotong di layar`, `tinjau hasil render antarmuka`, `bantu periksa tata letak dari tangkapan layar`, `kiểm tra giao diện từ ảnh chụp màn hình`, `hãy kiểm tra bố cục bị lỗi`, `kiểm tra trực quan trang đã render`, `kiểm tra các thành phần bị cắt trên màn hình`, `rà soát kết quả render của giao diện`, `giúp kiểm tra bố cục từ ảnh chụp`

Catalog Metadata

Category: materials Phase: visual-qa Hermes role: operator Quality tier: visual-qa-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • List the exact pages, states, viewports, files, images, or TUI frames being checked.
  • For TUI surfaces, bind every capture to an explicit terminal size (80x24 and 120x40 at minimum); pasted rendered output at a named size is the screenshot-equivalent, and a capture without its size is not evidence.
  • Combine objective capture/diff evidence, hotspot review, alpha/transparent-background checks, and human-readable visual findings.
  • Capture interaction, click-path, and motion states when the UI has transitions or controls that change state.
  • Separate design-system consistency, functional integrity, visual fidelity, responsive behavior, accessibility visibility, and CJK/text precision.
  • Score every round through references/visual-verdict-contract.md: integer 0-100 score, PASS/REVISE/BLOCK, and a differences list pairing each observed problem with the smallest fix.
  • Hold 90 as the pass line: under it the verdict is REVISE and the named edits, a recapture of the same pages/states/viewports, and a fresh scored round are owed; rescoring the same captures is not a new round.
  • A host-collected sub-90 baseline needs a changed revision, next round ordinal, and newer same-condition capture; plan caps only tighten.
  • On Hermes, when browser_vision is in your tool list or tool_search finds it, the session can take its own captures: each such render_capture_manifest/v1 entry records the screenshot_path it returned, the URL, the viewport width the page reported, and the target revision, and an entry missing any of the four is not evidence; captures from the wrapper, executor, or user still count.
  • Score a round from the captured image itself, never from an auxiliary model's analysis text, which is what the capture tool returns when the session has no native vision.
  • On Hermes, for the session's own captures, set each required viewport with browser_cdp Emulation.setDeviceMetricsOverride when browser_cdp is in your tool list or tool_search finds it (Hermes offers it only with a CDP endpoint the user configured), then read the width back through browser_console (window.innerWidth) before the capture: each browser_cdp call opens its own connection, so the override may not hold, and a width that reads back other than the one requested is not that viewport. Without that tool, a width the browser does not already report is a named blocker for the session's own captures, and a capture of that width from the wrapper, executor, or user still counts.
  • On Hermes, when browser_console is in your tool list or tool_search finds it, read it after every navigation and every interaction in scope and record its errors in console_network_health/v1; a clean console read is console evidence only, never network, accessibility, or visual evidence.
  • Exploratory bug-hunting goes to Hermes' bundled dogfood skill when it is available: its issues and screenshots enter this verdict only as observed findings bound to the target lineage, and a report with no issues is not a PASS.

Handoff policy:

Keep the QA plan, evidence manifest, target-lineage rule, and verdict narration in Hermes. Screenshots, TUI captures, image diffs, browser runs, OCR/CJK checks, and oracle reviews are observed evidence supplied by the wrapper, executor, or user, or taken by the session's own browser tools.

Required inputs:

  • surface type
  • target URL, route, file, image, or TUI command when available
  • intended design, baseline, or reference
  • pages, states, viewports, and locales to cover
  • complete page/state/viewport enumeration rather than a sample
  • target repository and exact source revision
  • known risk areas such as CJK, overflow, responsiveness, or accessibility
  • motion and interaction states that need capture
  • browser interaction paths, mutating-flow boundary, and test credentials policy when a live web UI is in scope
  • console, network, accessibility, and keyboard navigation checks required for browser QA claims
  • render/capture evidence bound to the target repository and revision for completion claims

Expected outputs:

  • visual_qa_plan/v1
  • web_visual_qa_package/v2
  • viewport_state_capture_matrix/v1
  • message_attachment_projection/v1 for chat attachments
  • web_visual_qa_message_card/v1 for chat message summaries
  • render_capture_manifest/v1 when observed
  • browser_interaction_trace/v1 when observed
  • console_network_health/v1 when observed
  • click_path_state_trace/v1 when observed
  • accessibility_keyboard_trace/v1 when observed
  • visual_diff_evidence/v1 when observed
  • visual_hotspot_review/v1 when observed
  • motion_interaction_capture/v1 when observed
  • dual_oracle_visual_review/v1 when observed
  • cjk_layout_findings/v1 when applicable
  • visual_qa_verdict/v1
  • retry_or_blocker/v1

Artifact expectations:

  • visual_qa_plan/v1 with pages, states, viewports, references, and exact target repository/revision lineage
  • web_visual_qa_package/v2 with target_lineage, unique required_viewports, capture source_lineage, blocking_violations, criteria, reviews, auto routing, and observed-only cost policy
  • viewport_state_capture_matrix/v1 enumerates every route/page, 375/768/1280-style viewport, scroll position, modal/tab state, and CJK-heavy region to capture
  • message_attachment_projection/v1 maps eligible observed captures to attachment candidates without claiming delivery
  • web_visual_qa_message_card/v1 projects recorded criteria, captures, routing, cost policy, and attachment hints into chat-safe copy
  • render_capture_manifest/v1 only from captures whose source lineage matches the target package
  • browser_interaction_trace/v1 only from observed journey runs with read-only or staging-safe boundaries recorded
  • console_network_health/v1 records observed console errors, failed requests, status codes, and ignored third-party noise
  • click_path_state_trace/v1 maps each touchpoint to its handler, state reads/writes, final UI state, and undo/race/stale-closure risks
  • accessibility_keyboard_trace/v1 records observed focus order, keyboard reachability, and automated scan boundaries
  • visual_diff_evidence/v1 only when the wrapper/executor records objective diff output such as dimensionsMatch, diffRatio, similarityScore, alphaChannelIntact, and hotspots
  • motion_interaction_capture/v1 only when motion frames are observed before, during, and after transition
  • visual_hotspot_review/v1 maps diff hotspots, TUI overflow lines, or screenshot regions to visual causes
  • dual_oracle_visual_review/v1 only when independent read-only review evidence exists
  • visual_qa_verdict/v1 with the integer 0-100 score, PASS/REVISE/BLOCK, and difference/suggestion pairs
  • PASS unavailable until capture repository/revision lineage exactly matches the package target, every required viewport is captured, and all supplied blocking findings are resolved
  • web_qa_observation_run/v1 and web_qa_comparison/v1 only from a host_web_qa_adapter_receipt/v1 imported through omh web-qa observation: seven independently observed channels or a named blocker per cell

Safety rules:

  • Never claim PASS without rendered evidence whose repository and revision exactly match the package target lineage.
  • Source review, mismatched-lineage captures, generated plans, and unobserved browser commands are not visual QA evidence.
  • Do not sample only one good page, viewport, or state when the surface has more; missed pages, modals, scroll states, or CJK-heavy regions keep PASS unavailable.
  • Do not run destructive browser journeys such as checkout, payment, delete, or mass-update on production URLs; require staging or explicit safe test boundaries and redact credentials/PII from captures.
  • Do not claim browser interaction PASS without observed click-path/state-transition traces for the touchpoints in scope.
  • Do not claim accessibility from automated scan output alone; keyboard and focus-order evidence are separate observed checks.
  • Pixel diff localizes hotspots only; it never produces the score or verdict, and objective diffs are evidence, not verdicts: review visual hierarchy, layout, CJK text, state coverage, and product intent separately.
  • Do not excuse diff hotspots as animation; capture settled frames and motion frames separately.
  • Claim high confidence only with two read-only reviews: design-system/functional integrity and visual fidelity/CJK precision.
  • Operator-supplied blocking criteria (CJK clipping, broken wrapping, overlapping UI, invisible text, unusable controls, offscreen critical content) block PASS until _validate_pass sees passing evidence refs.
  • Do not launch, poll, or watch browsers, image tools, LLMs, or external services from OMH core; the selected host or executor adapter does that work.
  • A host receipt is observation, not permission: a missing channel keeps BLOCK, unequal condition digests are not_comparable, and a completed run is reused, not recollected.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: visual-qa.

omh runtime record --skill visual-qa --harness visual-qa --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

dag-ulw

免费

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes35642026年10月22日 更新

查看 rlaope 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题