A2A agent protocol interoperability, Agent Cards, and MCP bridging / Protokol agen A2A, Agent Cards, dan integrasi MCP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Audit REA CI and test suites for correctness and measured performance / Audit suite tes dan CI REA untuk ketepatan dan performa terukur.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Establish which checks still catch real regressions and which costs can be removed without losing that protection. The outcome may be a verified fix, an evidence-backed recommendation, or an explicit decision to stop.
Follow the checkout's AGENTS.md, testing guide,
and contribution rules. Use their current commands
and pinned toolchain, rather than commands remembered from an earlier audit.
Preserve the requested scope: investigation alone does not authorize edits;
this skill does not grant permission to publish issues, push, or merge. Existing
user authorization still applies. Keep audit notes and raw results outside the
tracked tree, normally in a task-specific /tmp directory.
Fetch when the user asks for latest main. Pin the baseline SHA and inspected workflow revision; use an isolated worktree when changing or comparing code. Do not modify another task's checkout. Record dirty changes and the exact command, toolchain, host, selected tests, instrumentation, and prerequisites. An old run is evidence for its executed revision, even if main advances.
Trace workflow triggers, changed-path selection, job dependencies, reusable actions, package scripts, test discovery, artifact producers, and report gates through to the commands that actually execute. Include scripts, generated data, runtime registration, and subprocess boundaries missing from import graphs. Check positive and negative selection paths: required files must be discovered once per intended test configuration; deliberate platform/configuration repeats are separate coverage. A missing explicit test or missing required report must not turn green. Optional lanes may skip; preserve their stated prerequisites.
Use existing timing and failure artifacts to select suspicious families. Run relevant checks to establish a baseline; reserve a full local suite for broad CI diagnosis or uncertainty that focused checks cannot resolve. Do not rebuild or rerun an unchanged complete suite after every documentation edit.
For each candidate, state the expected observable behavior and its owner, then construct the smallest reproduction against production behavior. Follow the producer and affected consumers before deciding where to fix it.
Classify findings as reproduced defects, supported costs, hypotheses, or unavailable evidence. Record the baseline command, observed output/exit status, expected result, affected scope, and competing explanation. A failure on main may be pre-existing; that does not by itself make it irrelevant to a CI audit. Attribute PR failures using the executed revision and a clean baseline, not just their resemblance to a previous failure. Retry only to test a specific transient explanation; retain the original failure and stop when repetition adds no evidence. A passing retry does not establish a root cause or a fix.
Read measurement and CI checks when investigating slowness, caching, runner waits, shared artifacts, or log noise. Compare equivalent completed work before claiming a speedup. Distinguish setup/build time, test execution, coverage instrumentation, dependency waits, and runner scheduling; state which costs remain unmeasured.
Prefer removing proven duplicate preparation, reusing immutable setup, and reducing repeated subprocess work before shrinking correctness coverage. Preserve independent sessions where lifecycle or concurrency is the oracle. Keep live tests fresh; a cached previous pass cannot validate current host, installed provider contents, permissions, or external state.
If implementation is authorized, make the smallest structural change at the owning boundary and add a regression that fails on the baseline for the right reason. Retest affected consumers and meaningful negative paths; verify cache invalidation or discovery when those mechanisms change. Read the installed Turbo documentation before changing its configuration or commands.
Run the repository's applicable checks and inspect complete current-head CI results before an authorized merge. Preserve required coverage and discovery gates. Do not suppress a failure, add blanket retries, raise timeouts, or delete distinct assertions solely to make CI green. Changes to these controls need their own demonstrated reason and retained failure detection.
Report each confirmed issue with exact revision, reproduction, consequence, proposed correction, and validation limits. Report performance with workload and measurements, not just a percentage. Use English issue/PR records when requested; follow the user's assignment, commit identity, review, and merge preferences without assuming them for other users. Open ready-for-review PRs only when that lifecycle is authorized. Resolve necessary review findings and check final main against the tested tree after merging.
Stop when the authorized work is verified, remaining benefits are unproven, or further changes would trade correctness for speculative speed. List genuine uncertainties without turning them into additional optimization rounds.
export type ReaCiFindingKind =
| 'reproduced-defect'
| 'supported-cost'
| 'hypothesis'
| 'unavailable-evidence';
export interface ReaCiAuditFinding {
readonly id: string;
readonly revisionSha: string;
readonly kind: ReaCiFindingKind;
readonly command: string;
readonly exitStatus: number;
readonly expectedOracle: string;
readonly observedBehavior: string;
}
import fs from 'node:fs/promises';
import crypto from 'node:crypto';
export interface FixtureExpectation {
readonly fixturePath: string;
readonly expectedSha256: string;
readonly schemaVersion: string;
}
export interface FixtureDriftResult {
readonly fixturePath: string;
readonly status: 'VALID' | 'MISSING' | 'DIGEST_DRIFT' | 'SCHEMA_DRIFT';
readonly actualSha256: string | null;
}
export async function auditFixtureManifest(
expectations: readonly FixtureExpectation[],
currentSchemaVersion: string
): Promise<FixtureDriftResult[]> {
return Promise.all(
expectations.map(async (exp) => {
try {
const bytes = await fs.readFile(exp.fixturePath);
const actualSha256 = crypto.createHash('sha256').update(bytes).digest('hex');
if (actualSha256 !== exp.expectedSha256) {
return { fixturePath: exp.fixturePath, status: 'DIGEST_DRIFT', actualSha256 };
}
if (exp.schemaVersion !== currentSchemaVersion) {
return { fixturePath: exp.fixturePath, status: 'SCHEMA_DRIFT', actualSha256 };
}
return { fixturePath: exp.fixturePath, status: 'VALID', actualSha256 };
} catch {
return { fixturePath: exp.fixturePath, status: 'MISSING', actualSha256: null };
}
})
);
}
export interface VacuousTestFinding {
readonly testName: string;
readonly reason: 'NO_ASSERTION_CALL' | 'TRIVIAL_TAUTOLOGY' | 'SWALLOWED_SUBPROCESS_EXIT';
}
export function detectVacuousTestBlocks(testFileSource: string): VacuousTestFinding[] {
const findings: VacuousTestFinding[] = [];
const testBlockRegex = /(?:it|test)\(\s*['"`]([^'"`]+)['"`]\s*,\s*(?:async\s*)?\([^)]*\)\s*=>\s*\{([\s\S]*?)\}\s*\)/g;
let match: RegExpExecArray | null;
while ((match = testBlockRegex.exec(testFileSource)) !== null) {
const testName = match[1];
const body = match[2];
const hasAssertion = /\b(?:assert|expect)\b/.test(body);
if (!hasAssertion) {
findings.push({ testName, reason: 'NO_ASSERTION_CALL' });
continue;
}
if (/expect\(\s*true\s*\)\.toBe\(\s*true\s*\)|assert\.ok\(\s*true\s*\)/.test(body)) {
findings.push({ testName, reason: 'TRIVIAL_TAUTOLOGY' });
}
if (/spawnSync|execFile/.test(body) && !/status|exitCode|rejects|throws/.test(body)) {
findings.push({ testName, reason: 'SWALLOWED_SUBPROCESS_EXIT' });
}
}
return findings;
}
English & Bahasa Indonesia: Evidence-first CI and test-suite auditing for REA. / Audit CI dan test suite REA berbasis bukti.
reverse-engineer-anything, rea-tool-design — owners of the behavior under test / pemilik perilaku yang diuji.rea-analysis-optimization — handoff for analysis-path (non-CI) performance work / serah terima untuk optimasi jalur analisis.github-actions-expert, ci-cd-devops-architect — workflow triggers, caching, and job graphs / trigger workflow, cache, dan graf job.autonomous-tdd-debugger, property-mutation-testing-expert — failure reproduction and mutation-based gate verification / reproduksi kegagalan dan verifikasi gate via mutasi.brainstorming, deep-research-analyst — ideation routing and evidence review / perutean ideasi dan tinjauan bukti.还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
A2A agent protocol interoperability, Agent Cards, and MCP bridging / Protokol agen A2A, Agent Cards, dan integrasi MCP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert guide for automated and manual Web Accessibility (a11y) testing — axe-core, Pa11y, Playwright a11y, screen reader testing, and WCAG 2.2 Level AA/AAA compliance / Panduan ahli pengujian aksesibilitas web.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Web accessibility testing with axe-core, Playwright, and WCAG 2.2 / Pengujian aksesibilitas web axe-core, Playwright, dan WCAG 2.2.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert guide for intelligent model cascading and routing — complexity-scored task routing from Flash/Haiku to Sonnet/Opus/Astra, dynamic escalation with quality gates, 40-60% token cost reduction while maintaining output quality / Panduan ahli untuk kaskade dan routing model cerdas — routing tugas berbasis skor kompleksitas dari Flash/Haiku ke Sonnet/Opus/Astra, eskalasi dinamis dengan gerbang kualitas, pengurangan biaya token 40-60% dengan kualitas output terjaga.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Model cascading & complexity-scored routing (Grok, Gemini, Claude) / Routing kaskade model & scoring kompleksitas (Grok, Gemini, Claude).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Affective computing, emotion AI, and multimodal sentiment analysis / Komputasi afektif, AI emosional, dan analisis sentimen multimodal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。