跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

token-efficiency

Reduce token waste by 40-60% through anti-sycophancy rules, tool-call budgets, one-pass coding, task profiles, and read-before-write enforcement. Inspired by drona23/claude-token-efficient.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Token Efficiency

Reduce output token waste and prevent iteration cycles that consume context.

Trigger

Use when:

  • Sessions feel expensive or slow
  • Output is verbose with filler text
  • Claude is re-reading files or iterating unnecessarily
  • Setting up a new project for token-efficient work

Anti-Sycophancy Rules

These patterns waste 30-60% of output tokens:

PatternExampleFix
Sycophantic opener"Sure! Great question!"Delete. Lead with answer.
Prompt restatement"You're asking about X..."Delete. Answer directly.
Closing fluff"Let me know if you need anything!"Delete. Stop after the answer.
Unsolicited suggestions"You might also want to..."Delete unless asked.
AI disclaimers"As an AI model..."Delete entirely.
Verbose preambles"I'll help you with that..."Delete. Start with the action.

Tool-Call Budgets

Set explicit budgets by task complexity:

Task TypeTool-Call BudgetWrap-Up At
Quick fix / lookup20 calls15
Bug fix30 calls25
Feature (small)50 calls40
Feature (large)80 calls65
Refactor50 calls40
Exploration / research30 calls25

At the wrap-up threshold: commit progress, assess remaining work, decide whether to continue or start fresh.

One-Pass Coding Discipline

For simple-to-medium tasks:

  1. Read all relevant files including tests first
  2. Understand what tests assert before coding
  3. Write complete solution in one pass — not incrementally
  4. Run tests once — if pass, STOP immediately
  5. If fail: read the error, fix once, retest
  6. Never iterate more than twice on the same failure — rethink approach
  7. Never refactor, improve, or polish passing code

Task Profiles

Switch profiles based on what you're doing:

Coding Profile

  • Return code first, explanation after (only if non-obvious)
  • Simplest working solution, no over-engineering
  • Read file before modifying — always
  • No docstrings on unchanged code
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios
  • State bug, show fix, stop

Agent/Pipeline Profile

  • Structured output only: JSON, bullets, tables
  • No prose unless targeting a human reader
  • Every output must be parseable without post-processing
  • Execute task, do not narrate actions
  • Never invent file paths, API endpoints, or function names
  • If unknown: return null or "UNKNOWN", never guess

Analysis Profile

  • Lead with finding, context and methodology after
  • Tables and bullets over prose
  • Numbers must include units
  • Never fabricate data points
  • Summary first (3 bullets max), caveats last

Read-Before-Write Enforcement

Hard rules:

  1. Never write a file you haven't read in this session
  2. Never re-read a file already read unless it was modified
  3. Read tests before coding — understand what passes before writing
  4. Read error output carefully before attempting a fix

ASCII-Only Output

Use ASCII characters only in all output:

  • -- not — (em dash)
  • " not " " (smart quotes)
  • ' not ' ' (curly apostrophes)
  • No emoji unless explicitly requested
  • No Unicode decorators or special characters

This ensures clean copy-paste for code and compatibility with downstream systems.

Measuring Impact

Track these metrics to measure token savings:

  • Output length: average words per response (target: 30-50% reduction)
  • Tool calls per task: should stay within budget tier
  • Re-read count: should be near zero
  • Write-without-read count: should be zero
  • Iteration cycles: tests should pass in 1-2 attempts, not 5+

Attribution

Token efficiency patterns adapted from drona23/claude-token-efficient (MIT).

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Coordinate multiple Claude Code sessions as a team — lead + teammates with shared task lists, mailbox messaging, and file-lock claiming. Patterns for team sizing, task decomposition, and when to use teams vs sub-agents vs worktrees.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

Auto-configure quality gates, hooks, and settings for a new project. Detects project type and sets up appropriate tooling. Use when onboarding a new codebase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

Decompose large-scale changes into independent units and spawn parallel agents in isolated worktrees. Use for migrations, refactors, codemods, and any change touching 10+ files with the same pattern.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

Capture a user-reported defect as a durable GitHub issue written in the project's own domain language. Explores the codebase in parallel for context but never leaks file paths or line numbers into the issue. Use when the user reports a bug conversationally, runs a QA pass, or says "file an issue", "log this as a bug", "capture this".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

Smart context compaction with state preservation. Saves critical files, task progress, and working state before compaction, restores after. Use before manual compact or when auto-compact triggers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

Master the four operations of context engineering — Write, Select, Compress, Isolate. Manage token budgets, compaction strategies, and context partitioning to keep AI sessions sharp and efficient.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

rohitg00/pro-workflow29242026年9月29日 更新

查看 rohitg00 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题