跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

tdd-rust

Develop Rust filters for RTK through tests written before implementation. Use real command output as test inputs, check output snapshots and unexpected inputs, verify a minimum reduction target, and complete formatting, linting, and test checks before finishing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

TDD workflow for RTK filter development. Red-Green-Refactor with Rust idioms. Real fixtures, token savings assertions, snapshot tests with insta. Auto-triggers on new filter implementation.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Adding a new RTK command filter
  • Checking filtered output against saved snapshots
  • Testing empty, malformed, or ANSI-colored input
  • Verifying output reduction against real command results

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

RTK TDD Workflow

Enforce Red-Green-Refactor for all RTK filter development.

The Loop

1. RED   — Write failing test with real fixture
2. GREEN — Implement minimum code to pass
3. REFACTOR — Clean up, verify still passing
4. SAVINGS — Verify ≥20% token reduction
5. SNAPSHOT — Lock output format with insta

Step 1: Real Fixture First

Never write synthetic test data. Capture real command output:

# Capture real output from the actual command
git log -20 > tests/fixtures/git_log_raw.txt
cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_raw.txt
cargo clippy 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_clippy_raw.txt
gh pr view 42 > tests/fixtures/gh_pr_view_raw.txt

# For commands with ANSI codes — capture as-is
script -q /dev/null cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_ansi_raw.txt

Fixture naming: tests/fixtures/<command>_raw.txt

Step 2: Write the Test (Red)

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use insta::assert_snapshot;

    fn count_tokens(s: &str) -> usize {
        s.split_whitespace().count()
    }

    // Test 1: Output format (snapshot)
    #[test]
    fn test_filter_output_format() {
        let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
        let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");
        assert_snapshot!(output);
    }

    // Test 2: Token savings ≥20%
    #[test]
    fn test_token_savings() {
        let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
        let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");

        let input_tokens = count_tokens(input);
        let output_tokens = count_tokens(&output);
        let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - output_tokens as f64 / input_tokens as f64);

        assert!(
            savings >= 20.0,
            "Expected ≥20% token savings, got {:.1}% ({} → {} tokens)",
            savings, input_tokens, output_tokens
        );
    }

    // Test 3: Edge cases
    #[test]
    fn test_empty_input() {
        let result = filter_mycmd("");
        assert!(result.is_ok());
        // Empty input = empty output OR passthrough, never panic
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_malformed_input() {
        let result = filter_mycmd("not valid command output\nrandom text\n");
        // Must not panic — either filter best-effort or return input unchanged
        assert!(result.is_ok());
    }
}

Run: cargo test → should fail (function doesn't exist yet).

Step 3: Minimum Implementation (Green)

// src/mycmd_cmd.rs

use anyhow::{Context, Result};
use regex::Regex;
use std::sync::LazyLock;

static ERROR_RE: LazyLock<Regex> =
    LazyLock::new(|| Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap());

pub fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
    if input.is_empty() {
        return Ok(String::new());
    }

    let filtered: Vec<&str> = input.lines()
        .filter(|line| ERROR_RE.is_match(line))
        .collect();

    Ok(filtered.join("\n"))
}

Run: cargo test → green.

Step 4: Accept Snapshot

# First run creates the snapshot
cargo test test_filter_output_format

# Review what was captured
cargo insta review
# Press 'a' to accept

# Snapshot saved to src/snapshots/mycmd_cmd__tests__test_filter_output_format.snap

Step 5: Wire to main.rs (Integration)

// src/main.rs
mod mycmd_cmd;

#[derive(Subcommand)]
pub enum Commands {
    // ... existing commands ...
    Mycmd(MycmdArgs),
}

// In match:
Commands::Mycmd(args) => mycmd_cmd::run(args),
// src/mycmd_cmd.rs — add run() function
pub fn run(args: MycmdArgs) -> Result<()> {
    let output = execute_command("mycmd", &args.to_vec())
        .context("Failed to execute mycmd")?;

    let filtered = filter_mycmd(&output.stdout)
        .unwrap_or_else(|e| {
            eprintln!("rtk: filter warning: {}", e);
            output.stdout.clone()
        });

    tracking::record("mycmd", &output.stdout, &filtered)?;
    print!("{}", filtered);

    if !output.status.success() {
        std::process::exit(output.status.code().unwrap_or(1));
    }
    Ok(())
}

Step 6: Quality Gate

cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test

All 3 must pass. Zero clippy warnings.

Arrange-Act-Assert Pattern

#[test]
fn test_filters_only_errors() {
    // Arrange
    let input = "info: starting build\nerror[E0001]: undefined\nwarning: unused\n";

    // Act
    let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");

    // Assert
    assert!(output.contains("error[E0001]"), "Should keep error lines");
    assert!(!output.contains("info:"), "Should drop info lines");
    assert!(!output.contains("warning:"), "Should drop warning lines");
}

RTK-Specific Test Patterns

Test ANSI stripping

#[test]
fn test_strips_ansi_codes() {
    let input = "\x1b[32mSuccess\x1b[0m\n\x1b[31merror: failed\x1b[0m\n";
    let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");
    assert!(!output.contains("\x1b["), "ANSI codes should be stripped");
    assert!(output.contains("error: failed"), "Content should be preserved");
}

Test fallback behavior

#[test]
fn test_filter_handles_unexpected_format() {
    // Give it something completely unexpected
    let input = "completely unexpected\x00binary\xff data";
    // Should not panic — returns Ok() with either empty or passthrough
    let result = filter_mycmd(input);
    assert!(result.is_ok(), "Filter must not panic on unexpected input");
}

Test savings at multiple sizes

#[test]
fn test_savings_large_output() {
    // 1000-line fixture → must still hit ≥20%
    let large_input: String = (0..1000)
        .map(|i| format!("info: processing item {}\n", i))
        .collect();
    let output = filter_mycmd(&large_input).expect("should succeed");

    let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - count_tokens(&output) as f64 / count_tokens(&large_input) as f64);
    assert!(savings >= 20.0, "Large output savings: {:.1}%", savings);
}

What "Done" Looks Like

Checklist before moving on:

  • tests/fixtures/<cmd>_raw.txt — real command output
  • filter_<cmd>() function returns Result<String>
  • Snapshot test passes and accepted via cargo insta review
  • Token savings test: ≥20% verified
  • Empty input test: no panic
  • Malformed input test: no panic
  • run() function with fallback pattern
  • Registered in main.rs Commands enum
  • cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test — all green

Never Do This

// ❌ Synthetic fixture data
let input = "fake error: something went wrong";  // Not real cargo output

// ❌ Missing savings test
#[test]
fn test_filter() {
    let output = filter_mycmd(input);
    assert!(!output.is_empty());  // No savings verification
}

// ❌ unwrap() in production code
let filtered = filter_mycmd(input).unwrap();  // Panic in prod

// ❌ Regex inside the filter function
fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
    let re = Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap();  // Recompiles every call
    ...
}

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Simplify Rust code in RTK by replacing verbose loops, unnecessary copies, and excessive abstractions with common Rust patterns. Preserve behavior and project requirements, including error context, fallback handling, exit codes, and existing test modules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Simplifying verbose loops and string construction
  • Removing unnecessary string copies
  • Reducing nested conditional and error handling code
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

Choose Rust design patterns for RTK modules that process command output. Use concrete examples to structure configuration, prevent type mixups, manage parser states, and select abstractions suited to the task without adding unnecessary architectural complexity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning the structure of a new command output filter
  • Preventing mixups between values with the same underlying type
  • Organizing configuration with many optional fields
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

Organize open GitHub issues by category, risk, linked pull requests, duplicate candidates, and inactivity. Optionally analyze selected issues in depth, draft responses, and apply approved comments, labels, or closures to keep the backlog actionable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Sorting a growing backlog of open issues
  • Checking whether suspected duplicate issues are truly duplicates
  • Prioritizing security risks and breaking changes
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

pr-triage

免费

Sort open GitHub pull requests by change size, automated check results, conflicts, and inactivity. Review selected changes in detail, draft constructive feedback, and post comments after the user approves them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Prioritizing a backlog of open pull requests
  • Finding overlapping changes and failing checks
  • Reviewing selected pull requests in detail
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

rtk-tdd

免费

Guide Rust development through test-driven development: write a failing test, implement enough code to pass, then refactor. Includes practical test patterns and final checks for formatting, static analysis, and test results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding Rust features with tests first
  • Reproducing bugs with failing tests before fixing them
  • Testing invalid inputs and error paths
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

Review GitHub issues and pull requests together to find duplicate work, security findings without fixes, and critical bugs without linked changes. Produce action tables and a dated report to support backlog reviews and sprint planning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing issues and pull requests before a sprint
  • Finding pull requests that duplicate the same work
  • Identifying security findings without proposed fixes
rtk-ai/rtk8.4万2026年10月17日 更新

查看 rtk-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题