Break down full ICML reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains reviewer summary/presentation/contribution/strength/weakness/question text and the goal is to split weaknesses/questions into granular R-style response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Apply the shared template first:
skills/stage1/template/SKILL.mdThen apply only the ICML-specific overrides below.
Extract exactly these six keys (numbers only):
rating <- Overall Recommendationconfidence <- Confidencesoundness <- Soundnesspresentation <- Presentationsignificance <- Significanceoriginality <- Originalitysummary <- Summarystrength <- Limitations (keep compatibility with shared output key naming)Strengths And Weaknesses (extract only concern/criticism parts)Key Questions For Authors# Stage1 ICML Breakdown## Scores must contain exactly the six keys above.If "Strengths And Weaknesses" mixes praise and criticism in one bullet, keep praise in preserved context and split only actionable weakness concerns into atomic issues.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-stage rebuttal analysis skill for RebuttalStudio. Use when organizing reviewer comments into stage-specific conference workflows, including stage1 breakdown, stage2 refinement, stage4 multi-round follow-up, and stage5 final remarks generation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。