跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

stage4-condense-context

Condense Stage 3 combined discussion content into compact markdown context for Stage 4 multi-round follow-up drafting.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md785 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Stage4 Condense Context Skill

Goal

Convert long Stage 3 "All" content into short reusable markdown context.

Input

  • stage3_all_source: full Stage 3 combined source for one reviewer.

Output

Return strict JSON:

{ "condensedMarkdown": "..." }

Required structure in condensedMarkdown

  • ## Key Question(s)
  • ## Main Answer(s)

Rules

  1. Keep wording concise and factual.
  2. Preserve key technical claims and commitments.
  3. Remove repetition and non-essential greetings.
  4. Do not invent numbers, experiments, or citations.
  5. Produce markdown ready for local file persistence.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

skills

免费

Multi-stage rebuttal analysis skill for RebuttalStudio. Use when organizing reviewer comments into stage-specific conference workflows, including stage1 breakdown, stage2 refinement, stage4 multi-round follow-up, and stage5 final remarks generation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

runtsang/RebuttalStudio2192026年4月4日 更新

查看 runtsang 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题