跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

trader-explain

Explain a trading model's prediction by ranking the input features that contributed to its signal. Returns a Markdown table and saves an attribution record with calculation settings, adding a digital signature when a signing key is available.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Regulator-grade feature attribution for any LSTM/Transformer signal — single-entry PageRank ranks the top-K features that drove the prediction (ADR-126 Phase 6, ADR-123 single-entry PR)

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Reviewing which inputs drove a trading signal
  • Saving signed records of model explanations
  • Reproducing rankings with the same signal and seed
  • Checking whether an explanation used a fallback method

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Explain a trading signal by building a feature-contribution graph and running single-entry forward-push PageRank from the signal output node. Top-K ranked features are returned as a markdown table AND persisted to trading-analysis as a SignedAttributionArtifact (ADR-126 Phase 6).

Why this skill matters:

  • EU AI Act + SEC Reg-AI guidance require interpretable model output for any algorithmic trading system that touches retail capital. This is the regulator-grade attribution path the rest of the substrate has been waiting for.
  • The same call site picks up the full native-WASM PageRank from mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry once that tool is registered in the runtime — until then, the local power-iteration kernel ships in signed-attribution.mjs and produces the same ordering (seeded mulberry32).

Steps:

  1. Retrieve the signal from the canonical trading-signals namespace (ADR-126 Phase 1 + Phase 2 lifecycle):

    mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve({
      key: "SIGNAL_ID",
      namespace: "trading-signals"
    })
    

    The signal entry includes modelId, prediction, and the feature vector at the time of inference.

  2. Extract per-feature contribution scores from the model:

    npx neural-trader --predict --signal "$SIGNAL_ID" --explain --json
    

    The expected output shape:

    {
      features: Array<{ name: string; contribution: number }>;
      // for Transformers, also includes per-head attention co-occurrence:
      attention?: Array<{ head: string; cooccur: Array<[number, number, number]> }>;
    }
    

    Fallback path — if --explain is not shipped on the installed neural-trader build (older versions; the flag was scoped for a follow-up upstream PR), the skill degrades to a deterministic feature-importance heuristic over the signal's input vector: contribution_i = |input_i - μ_i| / σ_i (z-score magnitude). This is a known proxy — not as faithful as attention/SHAP — and the resulting artifact is tagged attribution_method: "input-zscore-fallback" so downstream consumers can filter it out for regulator filings. Document the fallback path in the resulting markdown summary so the agent surfaces it to the user.

  3. Build the feature-contribution graph:

    • Nodes: one node per feature + one source node __signal_output__ for the prediction.
    • Edges: outgoing edges from __signal_output__ to each feature node, weighted by contribution_i. When attention co-occurrence data is available, also add edges between feature nodes weighted by cooccur — this is what makes the PageRank single-entry rather than degenerating to plain top-K.
    • Source: __signal_output__ (index 0 by convention so the smoke can assert reproducibility).
  4. Run single-entry PageRank — preferred path when mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry is registered:

    mcp__ruflo-sublinear__page-rank-entry({
      nodes: GRAPH_NODES,
      edges: GRAPH_EDGES,
      sourceIndex: 0,
      damping: 0.85,
      maxIterations: 100,
      tolerance: 1e-8,
      seed: 42
    })
    

    The local fallback (localSingleEntryPageRank in plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs) runs ~30 LOC of seeded power-iteration when the MCP tool is not available — same math, same result up to floating-point tolerance, same ordering for the same seed (the Phase 6 smoke asserts this).

  5. Build the top-K AttributionFeature[] via topKFeatures(graph, scores, k=10, excludeIndex=0) — excludes the source node from the ranked output. Ties broken by node index (lower index wins) so the ranking is deterministic.

  6. Sign the artifact (reuses the Phase 4 signing primitives — same Ed25519 + canonicalization):

    • Build the SignedAttributionArtifact body:
      {
        signalId: SIGNAL_ID,
        modelId: SIGNAL.modelId,
        features: TOP_K_FEATURES,             // from step 5
        graphMetadata: {
          nodeCount: GRAPH.nodes.length,
          edgeCount: COUNT_EDGES,
          pageRankIterations: PR_RESULT.iterations,
          seed: SEED                          // load-bearing for reproducibility
        },
        generatedAt: NEW_DATE_ISO
      }
      
    • Resolve the witness signing key — same lookup order as Phase 4:
      1. RUFLO_WITNESS_KEY_PATH env var — JSON file with { "privateKey": "<hex>" }.
      2. verification/witness-key.json (the ADR-103 default path).
    • If a key resolves: signAttributionArtifact(body, privateKeyHex) from plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs.
    • If NEITHER path resolves: log "[WARN] ruflo-neural-trader: no witness signing key found — storing attribution artifact in UNSIGNED degraded mode. Regulator filings will reject UNSIGNED artifacts." and store the body unsigned. NEVER silently fall back.
  7. Store the (possibly signed) artifact to the canonical trading-analysis namespace (ADR-126 Phase 1):

    mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store({
      key: "attribution-SIGNAL_ID-TIMESTAMP",
      namespace: "trading-analysis",
      value: JSON.stringify(signedArtifact)
    })
    

    The trading-analysis namespace is the canonical home for model-analysis output (regime classifications, technical-indicator summaries, model-training results — and now attribution rankings). Long-lived — no TTL — because the audit trail is the deliverable.

  8. Return the markdown summary to the agent. Suggested format:

    ## Feature attribution for signal `SIGNAL_ID` (model: MODEL_ID)
    
    | Rank | Feature | Score |
    |------|---------|-------|
    | 1    | NAME    | 0.42  |
    | 2    | NAME    | 0.18  |
    | …    | …       | …     |
    
    - PageRank iterations: N
    - Graph: nodeCount nodes, edgeCount edges
    - Seed: 42 (reproducible — same seed → same ordering)
    - Path: mcp | local
    - Signature: ed25519:abcd… (or UNSIGNED — degraded warning above)
    

Verification

Downstream consumers verify the artifact before any regulator-facing report or paper→live promotion:

import { verifyAttributionArtifact } from 'plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs';

const ok = await verifyAttributionArtifact(artifact, trustedPublicKey);
if (!ok) {
  // [ERROR] attribution verification failed — refuse to publish.
  // Pin to trustedPublicKey from project config; do NOT trust the
  // artifact.witnessPublicKey field (CWE-347 / #1922 — attacker-controllable).
  return;
}

Acceptance criteria (ADR-126 Phase 6):

  • trader-explain <signalId> returns a ranked feature list whose top-3 features overlap the model's attention argmax (when --explain available; documented tolerance).
  • Reproducibility: two runs with the same signalId + same --seed produce byte-identical rank ordering (asserted by scripts/smoke-neural-trader-feature-attribution.mjs).
  • Signed artifact verifies under the trusted pubkey; tampering any feature score or graphMetadata.seed invalidates the signature.
  • Fallback paths engage cleanly: when MCP unavailable, local kernel runs; when --explain flag missing, z-score heuristic runs and the artifact is tagged.

Refs:

  • ADR-126 Phase 6 (this skill's authoring ADR)
  • ADR-126 Phase 4 (the signing scheme this reuses)
  • ADR-123 (single-entry PageRank substrate; the same family that Phase 3 leverages for portfolio CG)
  • plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.ts (the typed contract)
  • plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/signed-attribution.mjs (the runtime mirror)
  • scripts/smoke-neural-trader-feature-attribution.mjs (the regression smoke)

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Compare models available through the HuggingFace router with chat-ui configuration, research missing models, and write short English descriptions of their architecture and capabilities. Add entries to both production and development configuration files and commit the changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding newly available router models to chat-ui
  • Writing concise descriptions of model capabilities
  • Updating production and development model entries together
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Record the reasoning behind adopting a technology
  • Start an ADR for an API or data model change
  • Document an infrastructure decision
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

adr-index

免费

Build a searchable index and relationship graph from ADRs, records of architectural decisions. Import two supported document formats, refresh existing metadata without duplicate relationships, and review summaries of statuses, missing references, and inconsistencies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Index ADRs imported from another project
  • Refresh a graph that differs from files on disk
  • Set up ADR tracking in an existing codebase
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

Rebuild the index of ADRs, records of architectural decisions, after files or relationship lines are deleted. It clears stored records and relationships, indexes the files still present, and checks that the final record count matches.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Rebuild the index after deleting an ADR file
  • Remove stale relationships after editing an ADR
  • Reconcile the ADR index on a schedule
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records, documents that capture agreed design choices. Report violations, outdated references, compliant changes, and areas without ADR coverage, then suggest code fixes or a new decision record where appropriate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check a pull request before merging
  • Review major code changes against agreed design decisions
  • Find references to superseded ADRs
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

Check saved architecture decision records (ADRs) for broken references, circular replacement relationships, and inconsistent statuses. Use the results to verify imported records or stop a CI check when selected integrity rules fail.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking ADR integrity after import
  • Blocking CI when ADR issues are found
  • Reviewing ADR data before a release
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新

查看 ruvnet 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题