跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

consult

Bring how named experts would think about the question. Use when the user wants expert thinking on a tradeoff, choice, or stuck problem — not a verdict.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(94)

  • SKILL.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/abramov.md2.4 KB
  • profiles/alexander.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/appleton.md2.7 KB
  • profiles/armstrong.md2.9 KB
  • profiles/beck.md3.4 KB
  • profiles/bloch.md4.8 KB
  • profiles/boyd.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/brander.md2.7 KB
  • profiles/bruner.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/cagan.md2.2 KB
  • profiles/case.md2.5 KB
  • profiles/cherny.md5.5 KB
  • profiles/cook.md2.8 KB
  • profiles/cox.md5.4 KB
  • profiles/dawkins.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/deming.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/dhh.md4.9 KB
  • profiles/evans.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/feathers.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/fielding.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/fogg.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/forsgren.md6.0 KB
  • profiles/fowler.md3.1 KB
  • profiles/freeman.md1.4 KB
  • profiles/frost.md2.6 KB
  • profiles/geertz.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/goldratt.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/goodhart.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/graham.md2.9 KB
  • profiles/gregg.md2.5 KB
  • profiles/helland.md6.0 KB
  • profiles/hettinger.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/hickey.md2.5 KB
  • profiles/hightower.md2.7 KB
  • profiles/hughes.md5.3 KB
  • profiles/humble.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/huyen.md5.6 KB
  • profiles/inkandswitch.md2.4 KB
  • profiles/jacobs.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/jobs.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/kahneman.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/karpathy.md5.2 KB
  • profiles/kauffman.md3.9 KB
  • profiles/kay.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/khorshid.md2.9 KB
  • profiles/king.md2.6 KB
  • profiles/klein.md4.0 KB
  • profiles/kleppmann.md3.0 KB
  • profiles/kuhn.md2.3 KB
  • profiles/lamport.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/litt.md3.1 KB
  • profiles/majors.md3.0 KB
  • profiles/martin.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/matuschak.md3.0 KB
  • profiles/meadows.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/milewski.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/minto.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/muratori.md5.2 KB
  • profiles/newman.md1.5 KB
  • profiles/norman.md1.5 KB
  • profiles/nygard.md4.9 KB
  • profiles/orwell.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/osmani.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/ostrom.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/ousterhout.md3.2 KB
  • profiles/papert.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/pavlo.md5.3 KB
  • profiles/perrow.md1.7 KB
  • profiles/perry.md2.8 KB
  • profiles/pike.md1.5 KB
  • profiles/popper.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/reason.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/rumelt.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/sadalage.md5.3 KB
  • profiles/schneier.md4.2 KB
  • profiles/scott.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/shostack.md4.5 KB
  • profiles/simon.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/simpson.md1.9 KB
  • profiles/skelton-pais.md5.6 KB
  • profiles/snowden.md3.6 KB
  • profiles/soueidan.md2.8 KB
  • profiles/tufte.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/vaughan.md4.0 KB
  • profiles/vergnaud.md4.9 KB
  • profiles/vernon.md1.6 KB
  • profiles/victor.md1.8 KB
  • profiles/vygotsky.md2.1 KB
  • profiles/wathan.md2.0 KB
  • profiles/willison.md2.5 KB
  • profiles/wittgenstein.md2.1 KB
  • profiles/young.md5.0 KB
  • profiles/zhuo.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Pick

Take the experts the user names. Where they name none, or the question needs an angle theirs miss, read profiles/ and add one or two whose work bears on it — each bringing a different idea to try, not a side in an argument.

Ideas

Three to five ideas across the panel. The reply opens on idea 1 — no preamble, no method, no note on sources or counts:

1. <Expert> — **<the change>**
   *<why, in their voice>*

The change alone is bold: it is what the user acts on. The name stays plain, the why italic.

  • The change is concrete: what to cut, add, or swap in the thing in question.
  • The why is one clause: what that expert would see in this thing, judged on the matter in hand. Their way of thinking, applied — never a record of what they did, a count from their catalogue, or a title of their work.
  • No line past 72 characters; a line that won't fit is saying two things.
  • A number appears only where the idea is the number.
  • Where the thing already exists, each idea is an A/B against it. One line after the ideas says how a pick wins, as Win: <one clause>. An idea judged another way carries its own win: line under its why, never in the shared one.

Result

The ideas, then the question alone on its last line: Build all <N>? Nothing else, not even a recommendation: choosing is the user's.

The question has one retrievable answer → retrieve it; stating a fact needs no expert. The user wants a verdict on something that exists → use judge skill. The user wants a proposal they already committed to attacked → use interrogate skill.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

anchor

免费

Rewrite a rule so anyone applies it the same way. Use when a stated rule or claim takes the reader's judgment to apply.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

clarify

免费

Turn words with two readings into one confirmed ask. Use when the user's words admit two readings that would build different things.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

compose

免费

Plan the skills an ask needs, invoke each as its condition arrives. Use when the ask has multiple aspects that different skills carry, or the user named multiple skills.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

deepen

免费

Hold an ask to the bar a top professional in its field would set — a deeper ask, never a bigger one. Use when an ask is clear but nothing yet names the sources, methods, target, or outside check the work will meet.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

draft

免费

Build the thing the user can't specify, choices surfaced. Use when the user needs something to react to before they can choose.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

elicit

免费

Draw out what the user holds but can't say. Use when the user knows something they cannot yet express.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

saadshahd/moo.md382026年10月17日 更新

查看 saadshahd 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题