跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

advisor

Consults Fable as an independent, read-only reviewer at an effort the caller matches to the question. The calling session (usually Opus, or Haiku) holds the task and escalates one decision point. Use before committing to an interpretation or a substantial piece of writing or analysis, when stuck or not converging, when changing approach, or as a final check on a finished task. Fallback for when the native advisor tool is unavailable. Not for a session already running Fable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • assets/architecture.svg3.5 KB
  • scripts/fable-advisor.sh4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

advisor — escalate a decision point to Fable

fable-advisor.sh starts an isolated Fable session that reviews one decision point and returns. If the session has the native advisor tool (/advisor fable), use that; this skill is the fallback for when it is off or reports itself unavailable.

<p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/scdenney/open-science-skills/main/plugin/skills/advisor/assets/architecture.svg" alt="advisor: the main model (Opus, or Haiku) composes one self-contained briefing, sends it to an isolated Fable advisor running at an effort chosen for the question, and receives one decisive read-only review in return" width="900"></p>

The two seats

SeatModelRole
MainOpus, or Haiku for cheap sustained workHolds the task, the context, and the decision. Does the work.
AdvisorFableReads one briefing, returns one review. Never edits files.

This is an escalation, not a peer review: a working model reaches up to the premier model when a decision point is worth it. The script pins the advisor to Fable and never falls back to another family, since a same-family fallback defeats the point. Inside orchestrate, an Opus lead is the main seat and the consult is one bounded call, not a delegation.

A session running Fable does not use this skill. A second, isolated Fable is the same model answering the same question. A Fable session that wants an independent read goes cross-vendor: orchestrate's Codex peer (codex-peer.sh --mode cross-check) or /model-committee. Decide from the model line Claude Code injects into the session ("You are powered by the model named …"), say so, and stop.

Choose Fable's effort

The caller picks the effort for each consult and tells the user the level and the reason in one line ("advisor at xhigh: choosing between two identification strategies"). It is never inherited from the session.

EffortUse for
high (default)a completion check; a bounded question whose answer you can check; a sanity read before writing
xhighan interpretation or design decision; stuck or non-converging work; a proposed change of approach
maxhigh-stakes and hard to verify: an identification strategy, a publication-facing claim, an irreversible choice

Anthropic recommends starting Fable 5.1 at high and stepping up to xhigh or max for the most capability-sensitive work; that is the basis for this ladder. A cheap session can still buy a max consult when the question warrants it.

Compose the briefing

The script starts a new claude process with no memory of this conversation, so the briefing carries everything: the task, what has been done, the current approach or the exact claim, and the precise question, with file paths and line numbers.

The consult runs with --safe-mode: no CLAUDE.md, skills, plugins, hooks, MCP servers, custom commands, or agents load (org-managed policy still applies). It sees the files in the -C directory and nothing else. Quote any project convention, methodological requirement, or house style the answer depends on into the briefing; asking "does this meet our reporting standard?" without stating the standard gets a confident generic answer.

When to consult

  • Before substantive work — before writing, committing to an interpretation, or building on an assumption. Orientation does not count.
  • When you believe a task is complete. Make the deliverable durable first; a consult takes real time.
  • When stuck — recurring errors, an approach that will not converge, results that do not fit.
  • When considering a change of approach.

On work longer than a few steps, consult once before the approach sets and once before declaring done. On short tasks, once or not at all.

Weigh the advice as evidence, not authority: primary sources and empirical failure outrank it. If your evidence and Fable's advice conflict, one more consult stating the conflict plainly ("I found X, you suggest Y — which constraint breaks the tie?") is cheaper than committing to the wrong branch.

Run a consult

OSS_ROOT=$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/cache/open-science-skills/oss/*/ 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)
"${OSS_ROOT}skills/advisor/scripts/fable-advisor.sh" \
  --prompt-file <briefing-path> \
  --out <output-path> \
  --effort <high|xhigh|max> \
  -C "$PWD"

Give the Bash call timeout: 900000 as a backstop; the script has its own timeout (--timeout, default 900 s — raise it for a max consult on a large briefing). Read the output and act on it; if you diverge from it, be able to say why. The Codex plugin's "stop after presenting findings" guidance applies to code-review handoffs, not here.

Notes

  • fable-advisor.sh --check confirms the claude CLI is on PATH and reports the default effort. A hand-installed copy under ~/.claude/skills/ shadows the plugin's and drifts out of date.
  • The consult runs --permission-mode plan and --no-session-persistence: advisory only, not resumable.
  • The script clears ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, so the consult bills the subscription even if the shell exports a key.
  • The model defaults to the fable alias; --model <id> pins a version. If the alias is unavailable, report it and ask rather than substituting another family.
  • Companion: codex/advisor/ is the same pattern for a Codex session, with gpt-6-astra in the advisor seat and the same effort ladder.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

advisor

免费

Consult an independent, read-only GPT-6 Astra advisor before committing to a substantive interpretation, approach, or final result. Not for routine work, implementation, or file edits. Uses gpt-6-astra at an effort matched to the question.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

beamer

免费

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer slide decks (lectures, seminars, talks), drawn from the author's own Overleaf edits and published slide-design guidance. Covers storyboarding, frame titles, slide prose, word and frame budgets, layout without overfull boxes, XeLaTeX fonts and Korean (xeCJK), color, figures and screenshots, Overleaf source hygiene, speaker notes, and a build-and-QA loop with a contact sheet. Use when writing, editing, reviewing, or building a Beamer deck, theme, or storyboard. A course skill supplies course facts and the frame skeleton; this skill supplies the craft. Not for HTML or PowerPoint decks, posters, or papers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

beamer

免费

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer decks (storyboarding, slide prose, frame budgets, layout, XeLaTeX and Korean fonts, color, figures, Overleaf hygiene, build QA). Use to write, edit, review, or build a Beamer deck.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

Audits a manuscript's citations for fabricated or nonexistent sources, DOIs that resolve to a different work, mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list, APA 7 or journal style, and whether each source supports the claim it is attached to. Checks entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, and DataCite and labels anything it could not verify NOT CHECKED. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs, or when a source may be AI-invented. Figures and tables go to figure-table-audit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

Audit a manuscript's citations for fabricated sources, DOIs that resolve to the wrong work, in-text and reference-list mismatches, style, and claim support, verified against Crossref and OpenAlex. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into analysis-ready long-format data: implementation identification, reshaping, choice-profile alignment, reference categories, and pilot exclusion. Use when a conjoint CSV needs cleaning, reshaping, or debugging before AMCE estimation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

scdenney/open-science-skills672026年10月18日 更新

查看 scdenney 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题