跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

agent-protocol

Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, response formats, and quality loops.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane星标 3(GitHub 3 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • references/communication-standard.md3.9 KB
  • references/invocation-patterns.md9.2 KB
  • references/quality-loop.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Inter-Agent Protocol

How C-suite agents talk to each other. Rules that prevent chaos, loops, and circular reasoning.

Invocation Syntax

Any agent can query another using:

[INVOKE:role|question]

Valid roles: ceo, cfo, cro, cmo, cpo, cto, chro, coo, ciso

Response Format

[RESPONSE:role]
Key finding: [one line — the actual answer]
Supporting data:
  - [data point 1]
  - [data point 2]
Confidence: [high | medium | low]
Caveat: [one line — what could make this wrong]
[/RESPONSE]

Loop Prevention (Hard Rules)

  1. No Self-Invocation — An agent cannot invoke itself.
  2. Maximum Depth = 2 — Chains can go A→B→C. Third hop is blocked.
  3. No Circular Calls — If A called B, B cannot call A in the same chain.
  4. Chain Tracking — Each invocation carries [CHAIN: cro → cfo → coo].

When blocked: Return assumption instead of invoking:

[BLOCKED: cannot invoke cfo — circular call detected]
State assumption used instead: [explicit assumption]

Isolation Rules

Board Meeting Phase 2 (Independent Analysis)

NO invocations allowed. Each role forms independent views before cross-pollination. If data is needed: [ASSUMPTION: ...]

Board Meeting Phase 3 (Critic Role)

Executive Mentor can reference other roles' outputs but cannot invoke them.

Outside Board Meetings

Invocations allowed freely, subject to loop prevention rules.

When to Invoke vs When to Assume

Invoke when: question requires domain-specific data, error would materially change the recommendation, question is cross-functional.

Assume when: data is directionally clear, you're in Phase 2 isolation, chain is at depth 2, question is minor.

Conflict Resolution

When two invoked agents give conflicting answers: flag explicitly, state resolution approach (conservative / probabilistic / escalate), never silently pick one.

Quick Reference

RuleBehavior
Self-invokeAlways blocked
Depth > 2Blocked, state assumption
CircularBlocked, state assumption
Phase 2 isolationNo invocations
Phase 3 critiqueReference only, no invoke
ConflictSurface it, don't hide it

Internal Quality Loop

No role presents to the founder without passing through the verification loop. See references/quality-loop.md for the full 4-step process: Self-Verification, Peer Verification, Critic Pre-Screen, Course Correction.

User Communication Standard

All C-suite output follows ONE format. See references/communication-standard.md for Standard Output, Proactive Alert, and Board Meeting Output templates.

Communication Rules (non-negotiable)

  1. Bottom line first. The founder's time is the scarcest resource.
  2. Results and decisions only. No process narration.
  3. About 5 bullets per section, ranked by impact. Keep what changes the decision; the rest goes to a reference doc. Never drop a critical finding to fit the number: show it, and point to the doc for detail.
  4. Actions have owners and deadlines. "We should consider" is banned.
  5. Decisions framed as options with trade-offs and recommendation.
  6. Risks are concrete. "If X happens, Y breaks, costing $Z."
  7. Silence is an option. Don't fabricate updates.

Resources

  • references/invocation-patterns.md — common cross-functional patterns with examples
  • references/quality-loop.md — self-verify, peer-verify, critic pre-screen, course correction
  • references/communication-standard.md — output templates for standard, proactive alert, board meeting

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Plan, design, and implement A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor. Covers hypothesis frameworks, sample sizing, metrics, and result analysis.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

Web/mobile accessibility decision guide: WCAG 2.2 AA, ARIA, keyboard nav, focus management, contrast, testing. Use for: a11y, accessibility, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard, contrast.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

Generate, iterate, and scale ad creative for paid advertising across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and X. Covers platform specs, creative frameworks, and quality validation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

Musica interactiva para juegos: layering vertical, re-secuenciacion horizontal, stingers, reglas de transicion con sync points, y mapeo de estados de gameplay a musica. Usar para: musica adaptativa, sistema de musica dinamica, transiciones musicales, combat music.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

Design multi-agent systems, create agent architectures, define communication patterns, and build autonomous agent workflows with structured evaluation frameworks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with pattern selection, handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls for sequential, parallel, router, orchestrator, and evaluator topologies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SebastianLuser/claude-code-arcane32026年10月27日 更新

查看 SebastianLuser 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题