Compare accessibility findings between two versions of a web page. Identify newly introduced and fixed issues, count existing findings, and report evidence and suggested fixes without editing application code.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Diff a live page's accessibility violations against a baseline — by default compares uncommitted changes (stash-based), or pass --branch [<name>] to diff against a branch. Reports only new violations introduced, violations fixed, and pre-existing count. Use `scan` for a full audit with no diffing.
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
This package does not bundle the CLI or browser. Verify the current installed tool schema or a reviewed pinned package version first. Do not evaluate $ARGUMENTS or branch/URL text as shell syntax.
/tmp filename. Capture the baseline and candidate using the actual supported CLI flags; do not invent commands when integration is unavailable.Accessibility diff — http://localhost:3000/ vs main (94 rules, live DOM)
2 new · 1 fixed · 4 pre-existing hidden
New — Critical
- color-contrast — 2.1:1 (needs 4.5:1), #bbb on #fff
where: main > p.subtitle fix: darken to #767676
Fixed
- img-alt — <img src="old.jpg"> (no longer present)
Each new violation: where (selector verbatim + file:line (symbol) if source present — never fabricate), evidence, fix (mechanical change or NEEDS HUMAN).
Don't edit. For an explicitly authorized fix request, use the available accesslint-audit procedure and verify with the same controlled baseline. This report-only skill does not authorize a separate agent handoff.
Close only browser processes, servers and snapshots created for this run. Preserve pre-existing sessions and recoverable work. Remove an isolated worktree only after needed evidence has been saved; never use a global browser stop command for cleanup.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Assess a new or existing AI project by examining its code, goals, and constraints. Recommend skills confirmed to exist in the available registry, then outline tasks and implementation phases with dependencies, completion criteria, and checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review code and infrastructure for security risks, map potential threats, and plan stronger defenses. The skill covers OWASP checks, attack and defense exercises, and incident response, with validation required for each environment.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Turn a repeatable task into an Andru.ia skill with clear inputs, outputs, examples, and limits. Draft SKILL.md, check the folder structure and required validations, and prepare a pull request describing the changes for review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Prepare an industry briefing once a project's sector is defined. It covers sector context, potentially applicable regulations, familiar interface patterns, technology choices, and risks, while separating verified evidence from hypotheses and questions requiring further review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Create presentation drafts from text, outlines, or documents through the 2slides API. Match a reference image's style, choose themes, add AI voice narration, and export slide images or audio for review and use.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan a 360-degree or peer feedback process and create empty response templates from confirmed requirements. Produces consistent CSV, SQL, JSON Schema, or Notion property mappings while keeping visibility choices and scoring configuration separate.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。