跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ai-sre-incident-response

Develop incident response procedures for LLM outages, declining answer quality, spending spikes, and unsafe outputs. Use example monitoring alerts, severity levels, recovery playbooks, and postmortem guidance to organize detection, response, and follow-up work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.

集成工具Kubernetes

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Plan fallback procedures for model provider outages
  • Investigate declining answer quality after a deployment
  • Prepare emergency controls for token spending spikes
  • Document incident timelines and prevention tasks

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md13.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AI SRE Incident Response

Apply SRE rigor to AI systems where incidents include quality regressions, unsafe outputs, and budget explosions.

When to Use This Skill

  • An LLM endpoint begins returning degraded or hallucinated answers
  • Token spend spikes beyond budget thresholds
  • A model provider goes down and traffic must fail over
  • Safety guardrails fire at abnormal rates
  • A new model deployment causes latency or accuracy regression

Prerequisites

  • Prometheus and Alertmanager deployed with scrape targets for AI services
  • Grafana dashboards for golden signals (latency, error rate, cost, quality)
  • On-call rotation configured in PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or equivalent
  • Runbook repository accessible to responders
  • Rollback mechanism for model and prompt versions (GitOps or feature flags)

AI Incident Classes

  • Availability incident: model/provider unavailable, timeout storm.
  • Quality incident: answer accuracy or tool success drops below SLO.
  • Safety incident: harmful or policy-violating outputs increase.
  • Cost incident: unexpected token or provider spend spike.

Severity Framework

SeverityCriteriaResponse TimeNotification
SEV1User-facing outage, compliance risk, data leak5 minPage on-call + incident commander
SEV2Major degradation in key flows15 minPage on-call
SEV3Limited impact or internal-only issue1 hourSlack alert
SEV4Cosmetic or low-priority regressionNext business dayTicket

Golden Signals for AI Services

  • Request success rate
  • Latency (queue + generation + tool execution)
  • Hallucination/groundedness proxy metrics
  • Cost per minute and per tenant
  • Guardrail violation rate

Prometheus Alert Rules

The thresholds below are illustrative. Calibrate them to the declared SLO, metric units, tenant budgets and workload; a groundedness proxy is not a verified quality measurement. Counter rates are per second, so the cost-per-minute alert explicitly multiplies by 60.

# prometheus-ai-alerts.yaml
groups:
  - name: ai-service-alerts
    rules:
      - alert: ModelEndpointDown
        expr: up{job="llm-inference"} == 0
        for: 2m
        labels:
          severity: sev1
        annotations:
          summary: "LLM inference endpoint {{ $labels.instance }} is down"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/model-outage"

      - alert: HighHallucinationRate
        expr: |
          rate(llm_hallucination_detected_total[10m])
          / rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.15
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Hallucination rate above 15% for {{ $labels.model }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/quality-regression"

      - alert: TokenCostExplosion
        expr: |
          60 * sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[5m])) by (tenant)
          > 0.50
        for: 3m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Token spend exceeds $0.50/min for tenant {{ $labels.tenant }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/cost-spike"

      - alert: LatencyP95Exceeded
        expr: |
          histogram_quantile(0.95,
            rate(llm_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
          ) > 5
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "LLM p95 latency exceeds 5s for {{ $labels.service }}"

      - alert: GuardrailViolationSpike
        expr: |
          rate(llm_guardrail_violations_total[10m])
          / rate(llm_requests_total[10m]) > 0.05
        for: 5m
        labels:
          severity: sev1
        annotations:
          summary: "Guardrail violations above 5% for {{ $labels.model }}"
          runbook_url: "https://runbooks.internal/ai/safety-incident"

      - alert: ModelQualityDrop
        expr: |
          llm_eval_score{metric="groundedness"} < 0.70
        for: 10m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Groundedness score dropped below 0.70 for {{ $labels.model }}"

      - alert: ProviderErrorRateHigh
        expr: |
          rate(llm_provider_errors_total[5m])
          / rate(llm_provider_requests_total[5m]) > 0.10
        for: 3m
        labels:
          severity: sev2
        annotations:
          summary: "Provider {{ $labels.provider }} error rate above 10%"

Response Playbooks

Model Outage Runbook

TRIGGER: ModelEndpointDown fires for > 2 minutes
RESPONDER: On-call AI platform engineer

1. Acknowledge alert in PagerDuty.
2. Check provider status page (e.g., status.openai.com).
3. Verify network connectivity:
     curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://api.provider.com/health
4. If provider is down:
     a. Enable fallback model route in gateway config.
     b. kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway FALLBACK_ENABLED=true
     c. Verify fallback traffic is flowing via Grafana dashboard.
5. If self-hosted model is down:
     a. Check pod status: kubectl get pods -l app=llm-inference -n ai
     b. Check GPU health: kubectl logs -l app=llm-inference --tail=50
     c. Restart if OOM: kubectl rollout restart deployment/llm-inference -n ai
6. Request the existing deployment-freeze mechanism for the exact affected scope.
   A Kubernetes annotation by itself does not enforce a freeze; verify that the configured controller/pipeline actually honors it.
7. Communicate ETA in #incident-channel.
8. When resolved, unfreeze and run smoke tests.

Quality Regression Runbook (Hallucination Spike)

TRIGGER: HighHallucinationRate or ModelQualityDrop fires
RESPONDER: On-call AI engineer + ML lead

1. Acknowledge alert. Open incident ticket.
2. Identify scope:
     - Which model version? Check deployment metadata.
     - Which routes/tenants affected? Filter by labels in Grafana.
3. Check recent changes:
     - Model version promotion in last 24h?
     - Prompt template changes in last 24h?
     - Retrieval index rebuild in last 24h?
4. If recent model change:
     kubectl rollout undo deployment/llm-inference -n ai
5. If recent prompt change:
     Prepare a reviewed revert on a topic branch, verify it in staging, and use the protected deployment path; do not push a production rollback blindly.
6. If authorized, increase redacted trace sampling for the affected route only after checking personal-data exposure and the remaining storage/cost budget:
     kubectl set env deployment/llm-gateway TRACE_SAMPLE_RATE=1.0
7. Run the existing version-bound evaluation suite against an authorized isolated copy of the model/prompt configuration using synthetic or redacted cases.
   No run_evals.py helper is bundled; never describe a production call as offline.
8. Confirm metrics return to baseline before closing.

Token Cost Explosion Runbook

TRIGGER: TokenCostExplosion fires
RESPONDER: On-call platform engineer

1. Identify top consumers:
     Query: topk(10, sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[15m])) by (tenant, model, route))
2. Check for runaway loops:
     - Agent retry storms (exponential token growth per request)
     - Missing max_tokens caps on new routes
     - Cache bypass due to config change
3. Apply immediate caps:
     kubectl patch configmap llm-quotas -n ai --patch '
       data:
         max_tokens_per_request: "4096"
         rpm_limit: "60"
     '
4. Review existing cache isolation before any enablement: tenant/user identity, permissions, invalidation and private-content retention must be enforced.
   Do not turn on a generic shared semantic cache during an incident.
5. If authorized, route only to an already approved fallback meeting the declared quality, privacy and cost constraints. Review the exact change before updating gateway configuration.
6. Notify affected tenants of temporary limits.
7. Open postmortem with cost attribution analysis.

Escalation Procedures

Level 1 (0-15 min):  On-call AI platform engineer
Level 2 (15-30 min): AI platform team lead + affected product owner
Level 3 (30-60 min): Engineering director + security (if safety incident)
Level 4 (60+ min):   VP Engineering + legal (if compliance/data incident)

Safety incidents always start at Level 2 minimum.
Provider-side incidents: open support ticket immediately at Level 1.

Detection Queries (PromQL)

# Request success rate by model
1 - (
  sum(rate(llm_requests_total{status="error"}[5m])) by (model)
  / sum(rate(llm_requests_total[5m])) by (model)
)

# Cost per successful answer
sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[5m])) by (route)
/ sum(rate(llm_requests_total{status="success"}[5m])) by (route)

# Hallucination rate trend (1h window, 5m steps)
rate(llm_hallucination_detected_total[1h])
/ rate(llm_requests_total[1h])

# Latency breakdown by stage
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_retrieval_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_generation_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(llm_tool_execution_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))

# Tenant cost leaderboard
topk(10, sum(rate(llm_token_cost_dollars[1h])) by (tenant))

Postmortem Requirements

  • Timeline with detector and responder timestamps
  • Blast radius by tenant and feature
  • Missed signals and alert tuning actions
  • Concrete hardening tasks with owners and due dates
  • Cost impact (dollars, tokens, affected requests)
  • Customer communication log

Postmortem Template

## Incident Summary
- **Severity**: SEVx
- **Duration**: start_time - end_time (Xh Ym)
- **Detection**: How was it detected? (alert / customer report / manual)
- **Impact**: X tenants, Y requests, $Z cost

## Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| HH:MM | Alert fired |
| HH:MM | Responder acknowledged |
| HH:MM | Root cause identified |
| HH:MM | Mitigation applied |
| HH:MM | Incident resolved |

## Root Cause
[Description]

## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| Tune alert threshold | @engineer | YYYY-MM-DD | Open |
| Add fallback route | @platform | YYYY-MM-DD | Open |

Chaos Engineering for AI Systems

Test drills only in a disposable isolated harness or separately authorized staging environment. Use synthetic inputs and a predeclared fault schedule, bounded duration, costs, recovery and notification policy; never deploy a known-bad model or block a real provider in production to create a drill. Regularly test incident readiness:

  • Provider failover drill: block provider API at network level, verify fallback activates within SLO.
  • Model rollback drill: deploy known-bad model version, verify automated quality gate catches it.
  • Cost cap drill: simulate runaway token usage, verify quotas trigger before budget threshold.
  • Cache failure drill: disable semantic cache, verify system degrades gracefully.

Troubleshooting

SymptomCheckFix
All requests timing outProvider status page, DNS resolutionEnable fallback provider
Gradual quality declineRecent model/prompt deploymentsRoll back to last known good
Sudden cost spikePer-tenant token usage dashboardApply emergency token caps
Guardrail violations spikeModel version, prompt injection logsEnable stricter input filtering
Intermittent 503 errorsPod restarts, GPU OOM eventsIncrease memory limits or reduce batch size

Related Skills

  • incident-response (incident-response) - Standard incident process and evidence
  • alerting-oncall (alerting-oncall) - Paging and escalation policy
  • llm-cost-optimization (llm-cost-optimization) - Spend controls and efficiency patterns
  • agent-observability (agent-observability) - Instrument requests, traces, and costs
  • rag-observability-evals (rag-observability-evals) - RAG quality monitoring

Limitations

  • Guidance executes against real environments: confirm target, blast radius, and rollback plan before applying anything.
  • Never deploy to production without explicit approval. Docs-only import: upstream scripts and templates not bundled.

Example

git status && git diff --stat
kubectl diff -f manifest.yaml

Adapted from BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (MIT); frontmatter, When to Use/Limitations, and safety boundaries added for upstream compliance. Docs-only import: helper scripts and templates not bundled.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Assess a new or existing AI project by examining its code, goals, and constraints. Recommend skills confirmed to exist in the available registry, then outline tasks and implementation phases with dependencies, completion criteria, and checks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning the first steps of a new AI project
  • Assessing technical issues in an existing project
  • Selecting relevant skills from an available registry
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

007

免费

Review code and infrastructure for security risks, map potential threats, and plan stronger defenses. The skill covers OWASP checks, attack and defense exercises, and incident response, with validation required for each environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing code and infrastructure security
  • Mapping threats with STRIDE or PASTA
  • Planning stronger security settings
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

Turn a repeatable task into an Andru.ia skill with clear inputs, outputs, examples, and limits. Draft SKILL.md, check the folder structure and required validations, and prepare a pull request describing the changes for review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating a skill for a repeatable task
  • Improving an existing skill’s examples and limits
  • Validating skill files and preparing a pull request
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

Prepare an industry briefing once a project's sector is defined. It covers sector context, potentially applicable regulations, familiar interface patterns, technology choices, and risks, while separating verified evidence from hypotheses and questions requiring further review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Researching industry requirements before product design
  • Checking regulations for a project's jurisdiction
  • Choosing interface patterns familiar to target users
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

Create presentation drafts from text, outlines, or documents through the 2slides API. Match a reference image's style, choose themes, add AI voice narration, and export slide images or audio for review and use.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create a presentation from text or an outline
  • Summarize a document into slides
  • Match slide styling to a reference image
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

Plan a 360-degree or peer feedback process and create empty response templates from confirmed requirements. Produces consistent CSV, SQL, JSON Schema, or Notion property mappings while keeping visibility choices and scoring configuration separate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Plan an anonymous peer feedback process
  • Create a CSV template for feedback responses
  • Align feedback fields across SQL and JSON Schema
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月23日 更新

查看 sickn33 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题