Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when partners deliver client work in your name: own the in-flight book, run the weekly delivery review, and rescue engagements before clients feel it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this when partners deliver client work in your name. Start from the in-flight engagement book (partner, client, scope, dates, staffing), the delivery status per engagement, the escalation history, and the client success criteria.
One row per engagement: partner, client, scope, milestone dates, the staffed team, and a red/yellow/green delivery grade with one line of evidence behind it. A grade with no evidence stays UNKNOWN.
The book is rebuilt weekly from the tracker, never from memory.
Most-at-risk first, one decision per engagement: on track, needs support, restaff, or escalate.
Before any escalation, build the peer map — functional peers with equal decision authority on both sides — and escalate peer-to-peer first.
A staffing gap gets a dated restaff line with an owner. Anything red two weeks running gets an executive escalation draft.
Name the failure mode — staffing, skill, scope, or client-side — pick one save motion with a date, and log it.
A third straight red week triggers the save-or-exit call with its evidence attached.
A per-partner delivery-quality read: on-time rate, escalation count, client satisfaction. It feeds the portfolio review and the renewal call, so delivery shows up in the commercial decision rather than beside it.
The graded engagement book, the weekly review log with its decisions, the active rescue plans, and the quarterly delivery-quality read.
No tracker means building the book from owner-pasted status notes marked INFERENCE, with standing up the tracker as the first action. No success criteria means drafting them from scope and confirming with the owner.
No staffing change, escalation, or client-facing message goes out without your explicit yes.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。