Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Packaging adaptation by AutoGPT, 2026-09-25. Original authorship and licence are retained. Changes are limited to the recorded name, metadata and file references; see ATTRIBUTION.md in this skill package.
You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.
You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.
You gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites) — customers speaking in public, unprompted. Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.
No signal exists yet, or you need answers only the customer can give. You run interviews and surveys directly. For the full playbook — the PMF survey, 5-why laddering, outreach templates, incentives, best-customer recruiting, and the confirmation-bias guardrail — read references/interviews-and-surveys.md.
Most engagements combine modes. Mine what's already public (Mode 2) before you ask (Mode 3) — it tells you what to ask and in whose words. Establish which mode(s) apply before proceeding.
Customer interview / sales call transcripts
Survey results
Customer support conversations
Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes
NPS responses
For each asset, extract:
Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?
Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?
Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?
Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?
Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use
Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?
After extracting from individual assets:
Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:
| Confidence | Criteria |
|---|---|
| High | Theme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments |
| Medium | Theme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment |
| Low | Single source; could be an outlier; needs validation |
Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.
Sample bias checks:
Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.
Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.
Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.
| ICP Type | Primary Sources |
|---|---|
| B2B SaaS / technical buyers | Reddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro |
| SMB / founders | Reddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro |
| Developer / DevOps | r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers |
| B2C / consumer | App store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments |
| Enterprise | LinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro |
Quick decision guide:
For every piece of content you find:
| Field | What to Capture |
|---|---|
| Source | Platform, thread URL, date |
| Verbatim quote | Exact words — don't paraphrase |
| Context | What prompted the comment? |
| Sentiment | Positive / negative / neutral / frustrated |
| Theme tag | Pain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language |
| Customer profile signals | Role, company size, industry hints from the post |
After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:
## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)
### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning
### Theme 2: ...
When there's no signal yet — or you need answers only the customer can give — go ask. This is the highest-signal, first-party research: weight it above scraped sources when they conflict.
Load references/interviews-and-surveys.md before running any interview or survey. It covers:
Analyze whatever you gather back through the Mode 1 extraction framework and confidence guardrails above.
Early-stage products (or new categories) lack first-party review data. Don't invent personas — walk outward through proxy sources, in order:
Personas built this way are provisional: tag each with its proxy source, and replace proxy evidence with first-party evidence as real reviews arrive.
Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.
## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]
**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]
**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]
**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]
**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]
**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]
**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]
**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]
**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"
**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]
Depending on what the user needs, offer:
Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.
If context is unclear:
Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.
| When to hand off | Skill |
|---|---|
| Writing copy informed by the research | marketing-copywriting |
| Optimizing a page using VOC insights | cro |
| Building a competitor comparison page | competitors |
| Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn research | churn-prevention |
| Planning paid ads informed by research | ads |
| Writing cold email using research on pain/trigger | cold-email |
| Translating customer research into an ICP for outbound | prospecting |
| Planning content based on discovered topics | content-strategy |
| Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing plan | marketing-plan |
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。