跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

pitch-deck-review

Review a pitch deck for decision flow, source support, internal consistency, clear metrics, and safe investor claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Pitch deck review

Review the deck against the approved company records. Improve clarity without making the company sound larger, safer, or more certain than the evidence shows.

Review in decision order

Check whether the deck answers:

  1. What problem exists, for whom, and how the company knows.
  2. What the product does and what is live now.
  3. What customers or users have done, with period and sample.
  4. How the company makes money.
  5. What market definition and source support the stated size.
  6. Why the team can execute.
  7. What the company is raising, for what period and uses.

Do not require one fixed slide order. Follow the investor's decision path and note where a missing fact breaks it.

Run the evidence pass

Create a claim table with slide, claim, label (FACT, INFERENCE, or OPEN), source, source date, and required fix. Check that:

  • revenue, growth, customer, retention, burn, and runway figures use the same definitions across slides;
  • charts state unit, date range, cohort or population, and sample size;
  • percentages reconcile to their numerator and denominator;
  • customer names, quotes, and logos have approved use;
  • forecasts read as plans or scenarios, not assured results;
  • market figures cite a current source and method.

Return useful edits

Lead with the five changes that most affect trust or understanding. For each, give the issue, why it matters, and replacement copy or chart instructions. Keep stylistic preferences after evidence and logic faults.

Safety rules

Never invent traction, a quote, a customer, a market number, a partnership, or an investor. Do not value securities, recommend terms, predict fundraising success, or give legal or investment advice. Mark legal, securities, tax, and forward-looking claim questions for qualified counsel or the finance owner.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Significant-Gravitas/skills-catalog22026年10月22日 更新

查看 Significant-Gravitas 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题