跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

offensive-krack-fragattacks

Evaluate older Wi-Fi clients and embedded devices for KRACK and FragAttacks vulnerabilities. Covers test suites, likely patch status, practical impact, and reporting findings by device, firmware version, and vulnerability identifier.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

KRACK (CVE-2017-13077..082) and FragAttacks (CVE-2020-24586..588 + 26139-26147) — key reinstallation, fragmentation, and aggregation attacks against WPA2 supplicants. Covers Vanhoef's test scripts, viability against modern patched stacks (mostly mitigated post-2021), residual unpatched embedded devices and IoT vendors, and the practical limitations of these attacks in modern engagements. Use when assessing legacy supplicants, embedded clients, or vendors with poor patch cadence.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Assessing older Wi-Fi clients
  • Reviewing IoT firmware patch status
  • Distinguishing KRACK and FragAttacks impacts
  • Preparing reports for each vulnerability

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

KRACK & FragAttacks

Two attack families against WPA2 client implementations. Both well-disclosed (KRACK 2017, FragAttacks 2021) and largely patched on modern OSes — but the embedded/IoT long tail keeps them in scope for many engagements.

When These Apply

FamilyTargetPatch Status
KRACKWPA2 supplicants in 4-way handshake / GTK / FT / TDLSMajor OSes patched 2017–2018
FragAttacksFrame fragmentation/aggregation across WPA2/3Most stacks patched 2021–2022

Probability of success today is high only against:

  • Embedded OEM devices (cameras, sensors, point-of-sale)
  • Old Android phones (<8 unpatched)
  • Industrial / SCADA Wi-Fi clients
  • Wi-Fi-enabled toys, smart bulbs, no-name IoT

Modern Win11 / iOS 16+ / Android 13+ / hostapd-2.10 are mitigated.

KRACK — Key Reinstallation

The 4-way handshake's M3 retransmission causes the supplicant to reinstall the same PTK with reset nonce/replay counters. Frames encrypted under the reused keystream become decryptable.

# Vanhoef's official test scripts
git clone https://github.com/vanhoefm/krackattacks-scripts
cd krackattacks-scripts/krackattack
sudo ./krack-test-client.py --interface wlan0
# Tests the supplicant on a connected client

Output identifies which CVE variants the client is vulnerable to.

Practical Outcomes

When successful:

  • Decryption of WPA2-encrypted frames between client and AP
  • TKIP downgrade enables packet injection
  • Recovery of session keys for the duration of the affected key cycle

Not a PSK recovery — you don't get the wireless password from KRACK.

FragAttacks — Frame Splicing

FragAttacks abuse 802.11 fragmentation and aggregation to inject frames that mix encrypted and plaintext fragments, or to splice attacker-controlled fragments into legitimate frames.

git clone https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks
cd fragattacks
sudo ./test-fragattacks.py wlan0 --interface wlan0
# Suite of ~12 tests covering each variant
CVEMechanism
CVE-2020-24588A-MSDU spoofing — inject crafted A-MSDU subframes
CVE-2020-24587Mixed-key fragment cache poisoning
CVE-2020-24586Decoupled fragment cache → reuse
CVE-2020-26139Forwarding plaintext frames before authentication
CVE-2020-26140Accepting plaintext frames in protected network

Practical Outcomes

  • Inject malicious frames that the client treats as legitimate (HTTP redirect, DNS poison)
  • Read decrypted fragments from cached state
  • Cross-protect data exfil via crafted A-MSDU

Targeting Workflow

  1. Identify the in-scope client (MAC, OS, vendor)
  2. Estimate patch likelihood — if modern OS, likely patched; if embedded, likely vulnerable
  3. Run the test suite from a controlled AP setup
  4. Report each vulnerable variant separately with the matching CVE
# Rogue AP that drives the test
sudo hostapd-mana /tmp/krack_test_ap.conf

# Force client to associate (deauth from real AP, or social-engineer)
sudo aireplay-ng --deauth 5 -a <real-BSSID> -c <client-MAC> wlan0mon

# Run test once associated
sudo ./krack-test-client.py --interface wlan0

Detection

  • WIPS may flag deauth-driven roams to attacker AP
  • Test scripts generate distinctive frame patterns; modern WIPS recognizes Vanhoef's tooling
  • Successful exploitation is essentially silent at protocol level

Reporting

For each vulnerable CVE:

  • Client model + firmware version (be specific)
  • Variant tested + result (vulnerable / patched / partial)
  • Practical impact in the engagement context (decryption only, or injection viable?)
  • Remediation: vendor patch URL, mitigation (WPA3 + PMF blocks most)

Key References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Assess Active Directory security by mapping accounts, permissions, and paths to administrative access. The skill covers credential misuse, certificate service misconfigurations, movement between systems, and hybrid identity environments involving Entra ID.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Mapping paths to administrative access in Active Directory
  • Reviewing ADCS certificate service configurations
  • Assessing permissions, delegation, and group policies
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

Organize red team exercises that simulate adversaries to assess an organization's detection and response. Covers engagement rules, infrastructure, operational controls, evidence handling, and reports that help security teams review gaps and prioritize improvements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Defining red team objectives and engagement rules
  • Designing an exercise that assumes an existing breach
  • Organizing evidence and activity logs
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

Review how evidence can be altered during authorized security exercises on Windows and Linux. Covers logs, timestamps, memory, disk records, and network traces, alongside the signs defenders use to detect manipulation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning authorized evidence manipulation tests
  • Reviewing Windows and Linux forensic artifacts
  • Checking detection coverage for altered evidence
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

Assess API business workflows for flaws that automated scanners can miss. The skill examines skipped steps, simultaneous transactions, authentication tokens, GraphQL, and webhooks, helping testers document weaknesses and their financial or operational impact during authorized assessments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing order and payment workflow integrity
  • Testing concurrent coupon redemption or transfers
  • Assessing JWT validation and GraphQL controls
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

Test REST, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs for weaknesses in authentication, access controls, input handling, and configuration. Provides protocol-specific checks, tool guidance, and detection indicators to help document reproducible findings and severity during authorized assessments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check access controls across users and roles
  • Review token lifecycles and request limits
  • Assess gRPC and WebSocket security
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

Assess Bluetooth Low Energy devices by inspecting exposed data and commands, pairing methods, captured traffic, and companion apps. The skill provides a testing workflow for identifying authentication gaps and weaknesses in device communication.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing BLE authentication in smart locks
  • Checking data access on fitness trackers
  • Reviewing pairing security
SnailSploit/Claude-Red76052026年10月13日 更新

查看 SnailSploit 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题