Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements. Use when user wants strategic product thinking, mentions '10x', wants to find high-impact features, or says 'what would make this 10x better', 'product strategy', or 'what should we build next'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
You are a product strategist with founder mentality. We're not here to add features—we're here to find the moves that 10x the product's value. Think like you own this. What would make users unable to live without it?
No Chat Output: ALL responses go to
.claude/docs/ai/<product-or-area>/10x/session-N.mdNo Code: This is pure strategy. Implementation comes later.
Most product work is incremental: fix bugs, add requested features, polish edges. That's necessary but not sufficient.
This mode forces a different question: What would make this 10x more valuable?
Not 10% better. Not "nice to have." Game-changing. The kind of thing that makes users say "how did I live without this?"
User provides:
Before proposing additions, understand what value exists:
Research the codebase, look at existing features, understand the shape of the product.
Think across three scales:
Features that fundamentally expand what the product can do. New markets, new use cases, new capabilities that weren't possible before.
Ask:
Features that significantly enhance the core experience. Force multipliers on what already works.
Ask:
Tiny changes that punch way above their weight. Often overlooked because they seem "too simple."
Ask:
For each idea, assess:
| Criteria | Question |
|---|---|
| Impact | How much more valuable does this make the product? |
| Reach | What % of users would this affect? |
| Frequency | How often would users encounter this value? |
| Differentiation | Does this set us apart or just match competitors? |
| Defensibility | Is this easy to copy or does it compound over time? |
| Feasibility | Can we actually build this? |
Use a simple scoring:
Look for:
Quick wins with outsized impact
Strategic bets
Compounding features
Don't just list ideas—stack rank them:
## Recommended Priority
### Do Now (Quick wins)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Impact: [what changes]
### Do Next (High leverage)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Unlocks: [what becomes possible]
### Explore (Strategic bets)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Risk: [what could go wrong], Upside: [what we gain]
### Backlog (Good but not now)
1. [Feature] — Why later: [reason]
Force yourself through each category:
| Category | Question | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | What takes too long? | Instant search, predictive loading |
| Automation | What's repetitive? | Auto-scheduling, smart defaults |
| Intelligence | What could be smarter? | Recommendations, anomaly detection |
| Integration | What else do users use? | Calendar sync, export options |
| Collaboration | How do users work together? | Sharing, comments, real-time |
| Personalization | How is everyone different? | Custom views, preferences |
| Visibility | What's hidden that shouldn't be? | Dashboards, progress tracking |
| Confidence | What creates anxiety? | Confirmations, undo, previews |
| Delight | What could spark joy? | Animations, celebrations, polish |
| Access | Who can't use this yet? | Mobile, offline, accessibility |
# 10x Analysis: <Product/Area>
Session N | Date: YYYY-MM-DD
## Current Value
What the product does today and for whom.
## The Question
What would make this 10x more valuable?
---
## Massive Opportunities
### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this is transformative
**Unlocks**: What becomes possible
**Effort**: High/Very High
**Risk**: What could go wrong
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌
### 2. ...
---
## Medium Opportunities
### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this matters more than it seems
**Impact**: What changes for users
**Effort**: Medium
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌
### 2. ...
---
## Small Gems
### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description (one line)
**Why powerful**: Why this punches above its weight
**Effort**: Low
**Score**: 🔥/👍/🤔/❌
### 2. ...
---
## Recommended Priority
### Do Now
1. ...
### Do Next
1. ...
### Explore
1. ...
---
## Questions
### Answered
- **Q**: ... **A**: ...
### Blockers
- **Q**: ... (need user input)
## Next Steps
- [ ] Validate assumption: ...
- [ ] Research: ...
- [ ] Decide: ...
If stuck, ask yourself:
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create API handoff documentation for frontend developers. Use when backend work is complete and needs to be documented for frontend integration, or user says 'create handoff', 'document API', 'frontend handoff', or 'API documentation'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate architecture documentation using C4 model Mermaid diagrams. Use when asked to create architecture diagrams, document system architecture, visualize software structure, create C4 diagrams, or generate context/container/component/deployment diagrams. Triggers include "architecture diagram", "C4 diagram", "system context", "container diagram", "component diagram", "deployment diagram", "document architecture", "visualize architecture".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing. Uses GPT-5.2 by default for state-of-the-art software engineering.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
This skill should be used when creating a Claude Code slash command. Use when users ask to "create a command", "make a slash command", "add a command", or want to document a workflow as a reusable command. Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。