Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration: understand the code, research what simple & elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI.
Run for 3 iterations (or as specified by the user — can be a number or a duration like 2h).
AskUserQuestion tool to ask: should this operate on the whole codebase or only on changes in the current branch/PR?git diff main...HEAD (or the appropriate base branch) to identify changed files and limit all subsequent steps to those files only.还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Avoids boring bullet lists; uses narrative paragraphs with bold/italic for emphasis.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。