跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

gsd-reapply-patches

Reapply local modifications after a GSD update

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md14.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

<codex_skill_adapter>

A. Skill Invocation

  • This skill is invoked by mentioning $gsd-reapply-patches.
  • Treat all user text after $gsd-reapply-patches as {{GSD_ARGS}}.
  • If no arguments are present, treat {{GSD_ARGS}} as empty.

B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping

GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:

Parameter mapping:

  • header → header
  • question → question
  • Options formatted as "Label" — description → {label: "Label", description: "description"}
  • Generate id from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores

Batched calls:

  • AskUserQuestion([q1, q2]) → single request_user_input with multiple entries in questions[]

Multi-select workaround:

  • Codex has no multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.

Execute mode fallback:

  • When request_user_input is rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.

C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping

GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:

Direct mapping:

  • Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y") → spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")
  • Task(model="...") → omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)
  • fork_context: false by default — GSD agents load their own context via <files_to_read> blocks

Parallel fan-out:

  • Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs → wait(ids) for all to complete

Result parsing:

  • Look for structured markers in agent output: CHECKPOINT, PLAN COMPLETE, SUMMARY, etc.
  • close_agent(id) after collecting results from each agent </codex_skill_adapter>
<purpose> After a GSD update wipes and reinstalls files, this command merges user's previously saved local modifications back into the new version. Uses three-way comparison (pristine baseline, user-modified backup, newly installed version) to reliably distinguish user customizations from version drift.

Critical invariant: Every file in gsd-local-patches/ was backed up because the installer's hash comparison detected it was modified. The workflow must NEVER conclude "no custom content" for any backed-up file — that is a logical contradiction. When in doubt, classify as CONFLICT requiring user review, not SKIP. </purpose>

<process>

Step 1: Detect backed-up patches

Check for local patches directory:

expand_home() {
  case "$1" in
    "~/"*) printf '%s/%s\n' "$HOME" "${1#~/}" ;;
    *) printf '%s\n' "$1" ;;
  esac
}

PATCHES_DIR=""

# Env overrides first — covers custom config directories used with --config-dir
if [ -n "$KILO_CONFIG_DIR" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$KILO_CONFIG_DIR")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
elif [ -n "$KILO_CONFIG" ]; then
  candidate="$(dirname "$(expand_home "$KILO_CONFIG")")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
elif [ -n "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME")/kilo/gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
fi

if [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
elif [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$OPENCODE_CONFIG" ]; then
  candidate="$(dirname "$(expand_home "$OPENCODE_CONFIG")")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
elif [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$XDG_CONFIG_HOME")/opencode/gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
fi

if [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
fi

if [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$CODEX_HOME" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$CODEX_HOME")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
fi

if [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ] && [ -n "$CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR" ]; then
  candidate="$(expand_home "$CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR")$gsd-local-patches"
  if [ -d "$candidate" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$candidate"
  fi
fi

# Global install — detect runtime config directory defaults
if [ -z "$PATCHES_DIR" ]; then
  if [ -d "$HOME/.config/kilo/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.config/kilo/gsd-local-patches"
  elif [ -d "$HOME/.config/opencode/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.config/opencode/gsd-local-patches"
  elif [ -d "$HOME/.opencode/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.opencode/gsd-local-patches"
  elif [ -d "$HOME/.gemini/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.gemini/gsd-local-patches"
  elif [ -d "$HOME/.codex/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
    PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.codex/gsd-local-patches"
  else
    PATCHES_DIR="/Users/gabrielwillen/VSCode/stateforward/emel/emel.cpp/.codex/gsd-local-patches"
  fi
fi
# Local install fallback — check all runtime directories
if [ ! -d "$PATCHES_DIR" ]; then
  for dir in .config/kilo .kilo .config/opencode .opencode .gemini .codex .claude; do
    if [ -d "./$dir/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
      PATCHES_DIR="./$dir/gsd-local-patches"
      break
    fi
  done
fi

Read backup-meta.json from the patches directory.

If no patches found:

No local patches found. Nothing to reapply.

Local patches are automatically saved when you run $gsd-update
after modifying any GSD workflow, command, or agent files.

Exit.

Step 2: Determine baseline for three-way comparison

The quality of the merge depends on having a pristine baseline — the original unmodified version of each file from the pre-update GSD release. This enables three-way comparison:

  • Pristine baseline (original GSD file before any user edits)
  • User's version (backed up in gsd-local-patches/)
  • New version (freshly installed after update)

Check for baseline sources in priority order:

Option A: Git history (most reliable)

If the config directory is a git repository:

CONFIG_DIR=$(dirname "$PATCHES_DIR")
if git -C "$CONFIG_DIR" rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  HAS_GIT=true
fi

When HAS_GIT=true, use git log to find the commit where GSD was originally installed (before user edits). For each file, the pristine baseline can be extracted with:

git -C "$CONFIG_DIR" log --diff-filter=A --format="%H" -- "{file_path}"

This gives the commit that first added the file (the install commit). Extract the pristine version:

git -C "$CONFIG_DIR" show {install_commit}:{file_path}

Option B: Pristine snapshot directory

Check if a gsd-pristine/ directory exists alongside gsd-local-patches/:

PRISTINE_DIR="$CONFIG_DIR/gsd-pristine"

If it exists, the installer saved pristine copies at install time. Use these as the baseline.

Option C: No baseline available (two-way fallback)

If neither git history nor pristine snapshots are available, fall back to two-way comparison — but with strengthened heuristics (see Step 3).

Step 3: Show patch summary

## Local Patches to Reapply

**Backed up from:** v{from_version}
**Current version:** {read VERSION file}
**Files modified:** {count}
**Merge strategy:** {three-way (git) | three-way (pristine) | two-way (enhanced)}

| # | File | Status |
|---|------|--------|
| 1 | {file_path} | Pending |
| 2 | {file_path} | Pending |

Step 4: Merge each file

For each file in backup-meta.json:

  1. Read the backed-up version (user's modified copy from gsd-local-patches/)
  2. Read the newly installed version (current file after update)
  3. If available, read the pristine baseline (from git history or gsd-pristine/)

Three-way merge (when baseline is available)

Compare the three versions to isolate changes:

  • User changes = diff(pristine → user's version) — these are the customizations to preserve
  • Upstream changes = diff(pristine → new version) — these are version updates to accept

Merge rules:

  • Sections changed only by user → apply user's version
  • Sections changed only by upstream → accept upstream version
  • Sections changed by both → flag as CONFLICT, show both, ask user
  • Sections unchanged by either → use new version (identical to all three)

Two-way merge (fallback when no baseline)

When no pristine baseline is available, use these strengthened heuristics:

CRITICAL RULE: Every file in this backup directory was explicitly detected as modified by the installer's SHA-256 hash comparison. "No custom content" is never a valid conclusion.

For each file: a. Read both versions completely b. Identify ALL differences, then classify each as:

  • Mechanical drift — path substitutions (e.g. /Users/xxx/.claude/ → /Users/gabrielwillen/VSCode/stateforward/emel/emel.cpp/.codex/), variable additions (${GSD_WS}, ${AGENT_SKILLS_*}), error handling additions (|| true)
  • User customization — added steps/sections, removed sections, reordered content, changed behavior, added frontmatter fields, modified instructions

c. If ANY differences remain after filtering out mechanical drift → those are user customizations. Merge them. d. If ALL differences appear to be mechanical drift → still flag as CONFLICT. The installer's hash check already proved this file was modified. Ask the user: "This file appears to only have path/variable differences. Were there intentional customizations?" Do NOT silently skip.

Git-enhanced two-way merge

When the config directory is a git repo but the pristine install commit can't be found, use commit history to identify user changes:

# Find non-update commits that touched this file
git -C "$CONFIG_DIR" log --oneline --no-merges -- "{file_path}" | grep -v "gsd:update\|GSD update\|gsd-install"

Each matching commit represents an intentional user modification. Use the commit messages and diffs to understand what was changed and why.

  1. Write merged result to the installed location

Post-merge verification

After writing each merged file, verify that user modifications survived the merge:

  1. Line-count check: Count lines in the backup and the merged result. If the merged result has fewer lines than the backup minus the expected upstream removals, flag for review.

  2. Hunk presence check: For each user-added section identified during diff analysis, search the merged output for at least the first significant line (non-blank, non-comment) of each addition. Missing signature lines indicate a dropped hunk.

  3. Report warnings inline (do not block):

    ⚠ Potential dropped content in {file_path}:
      - Missing hunk near line {N}: "{first_line_preview}..." ({line_count} lines)
      - Backup available: {patches_dir}/{file_path}
    
  4. Produce a Hunk Verification Table — one row per hunk per file. This table is mandatory output and must be produced before Step 5 can proceed. Format:

    filehunk_idsignature_lineline_countverified
    {file_path}{N}{first_significant_line}{count}yes
    {file_path}{N}{first_significant_line}{count}no
    • hunk_id — sequential integer per file (1, 2, 3…)
    • signature_line — first non-blank, non-comment line of the user-added section
    • line_count — total lines in the hunk
    • verified — yes if the signature_line is present in the merged output, no otherwise
  5. Track verification status — add to per-file report: Merged (verified) vs Merged (⚠ {N} hunks may be missing)

  6. Report status per file:

    • Merged — user modifications applied cleanly (show summary of what was preserved)
    • Conflict — user reviewed and chose resolution
    • Incorporated — user's modification was already adopted upstream (only valid when pristine baseline confirms this)

Never report Skipped — no custom content. If a file is in the backup, it has custom content.

Step 5: Hunk Verification Gate

Before proceeding to cleanup, evaluate the Hunk Verification Table produced in Step 4.

If the Hunk Verification Table is absent (Step 4 did not produce it), STOP immediately and report to the user:

ERROR: Hunk Verification Table is missing. Post-merge verification was not completed.
Rerun $gsd-reapply-patches to retry with full verification.

If any row in the Hunk Verification Table shows verified: no, STOP and report to the user:

ERROR: {N} hunk(s) failed verification — content may have been dropped during merge.

Unverified hunks:
  {file} hunk {hunk_id}: signature line "{signature_line}" not found in merged output

The backup is preserved at: {patches_dir}/{file}
Review the merged file manually, then either:
  (a) Re-merge the missing content by hand, or
  (b) Restore from backup: cp {patches_dir}/{file} {installed_path}

Do not proceed to cleanup until the user confirms they have resolved all unverified hunks.

Only when all rows show verified: yes (or when all files had zero user-added hunks) may execution continue to Step 6.

Step 6: Cleanup option

Ask user:

  • "Keep patch backups for reference?" → preserve gsd-local-patches/
  • "Clean up patch backups?" → remove gsd-local-patches/ directory

Step 7: Report

## Patches Reapplied

| # | File | Result | User Changes Preserved |
|---|------|--------|----------------------|
| 1 | {file_path} | Merged | Added step X, modified section Y |
| 2 | {file_path} | Incorporated | Already in upstream v{version} |
| 3 | {file_path} | Conflict resolved | User chose: keep custom section |

{count} file(s) updated. Your local modifications are active again.
</process>

<success_criteria>

  • All backed-up patches processed — zero files left unhandled
  • No file classified as "no custom content" or "SKIP" — every backed-up file is definitionally modified
  • Three-way merge used when pristine baseline available (git history or gsd-pristine/)
  • User modifications identified and merged into new version
  • Conflicts surfaced to user with both versions shown
  • Status reported for each file with summary of what was preserved
  • Post-merge verification checks each file for dropped hunks and warns if content appears missing </success_criteria>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add an idea to the backlog parking lot (999.x numbering)

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Generate AI design contract (AI-SPEC.md) for phases that involve building AI systems — framework selection, implementation guidance from official docs, and evaluation strategy

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Analyze phase dependencies and suggest Depends on entries for ROADMAP.md

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

查看 stateforward 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题