Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analyze email threads to extract current status, pending actions, timeline of events, and identify stale/outdated information. Use when asked to summarize email conversations, find outstanding action items in email chains, or detect when a thread summary is out of date.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Analyze email threads to extract structured intelligence: current status, pending actions, timeline of key events, and identification of stale/outdated information. The skill parses both Gmail (via gogcli) and Outlook email exports, producing actionable summaries with staleness detection for cached thread states.
.eml, .mbox, or JSON email export files for analysisgogcli must be configured (see gogcli-expert skill).eml filespython-dateutil for date parsingObtain the email thread data from one of these sources:
Option A: Gmail via gogcli
gogcli gmail messages search --query "thread:THREAD_ID" --format json > thread_export.json
Option B: Outlook via Graph API export
# Export conversation to .eml files in a folder
Option C: Direct file input
.eml, .mbox, or JSON files containing the threadRun the thread analyzer to extract structured information:
python3 scripts/analyze_thread.py \
--input thread_export.json \
--format gmail \
--output thread_analysis.json
Supported formats: gmail, outlook, eml, mbox
Generate a human-readable summary with action items:
python3 scripts/generate_summary.py \
--analysis thread_analysis.json \
--output thread_summary.md
Compare current thread state against a cached summary to detect drift:
python3 scripts/check_staleness.py \
--cached previous_summary.json \
--current thread_analysis.json \
--output staleness_report.json
Present the summary to the user with:
{
"schema_version": "1.0",
"thread_id": "string",
"subject": "string",
"participants": [
{"name": "string", "email": "string", "role": "initiator|responder|cc"}
],
"message_count": 0,
"date_range": {
"first_message": "ISO8601",
"last_message": "ISO8601",
"duration_days": 0
},
"status": {
"classification": "active|resolved|stale|escalated|awaiting_response",
"confidence": 0.0,
"last_action_date": "ISO8601",
"days_since_last_action": 0
},
"timeline": [
{
"date": "ISO8601",
"actor": "string",
"event_type": "request|response|decision|escalation|resolution",
"summary": "string"
}
],
"action_items": [
{
"id": "string",
"description": "string",
"owner": "string",
"status": "pending|completed|cancelled",
"due_date": "ISO8601|null",
"source_message_date": "ISO8601"
}
],
"key_decisions": [
{
"date": "ISO8601",
"decision": "string",
"made_by": "string"
}
],
"outdated_info": [
{
"original_statement": "string",
"stated_date": "ISO8601",
"superseded_by": "string",
"superseded_date": "ISO8601"
}
],
"analysis_timestamp": "ISO8601"
}
{
"schema_version": "1.0",
"is_stale": true,
"staleness_reasons": [
{
"type": "new_messages|status_change|action_item_update|decision_change",
"description": "string",
"severity": "low|medium|high"
}
],
"cached_summary_date": "ISO8601",
"current_thread_date": "ISO8601",
"new_messages_since_cache": 0,
"recommendation": "refresh|review|ignore"
}
# Email Thread Summary
## Thread: [Subject]
**Status**: [Classification] | **Messages**: [N] | **Duration**: [X days]
## Participants
- **Initiator**: Name <email>
- **Responders**: Name1, Name2
## Current Status
[One paragraph describing current thread state]
## Timeline
| Date | Actor | Event |
|------|-------|-------|
| YYYY-MM-DD | Name | Summary |
## Pending Action Items
- [ ] [AI-001] Description (Owner, Due: YYYY-MM-DD)
- [ ] [AI-002] Description (Owner, Due: TBD)
## Key Decisions
1. **YYYY-MM-DD**: Decision text (by Name)
## Outdated Information
- ~~Original statement~~ superseded by: New information (YYYY-MM-DD)
---
*Generated: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC*
| Status | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Active | Last message within 3 business days, no clear resolution |
| Resolved | Contains resolution language ("resolved", "closed", "done", "thank you for...") |
| Stale | No activity for 7+ business days, has pending items |
| Escalated | Contains escalation indicators (CC to manager, "escalating", urgent markers) |
| Awaiting Response | Last message is a question or request, no response yet |
scripts/analyze_thread.py -- Parse email thread and extract structured datascripts/generate_summary.py -- Generate human-readable markdown summaryscripts/check_staleness.py -- Compare cached vs current thread statereferences/thread_analysis_patterns.md -- Patterns for identifying action items, decisions, and status还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。