Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
A specialized skill for creating high-impact executive communications that drive decisions and save leadership time.
This skill helps create:
Core Framework: So What? / Why Now? / What Next?
Key Principles:
This skill generates executive briefing documents in Markdown format:
Documents are created using templates from assets/ and follow the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework.
references/executive_communication_guide.md - Communication principles for executivesreferences/so_what_framework.md - The So What? / Why Now? / What Next? frameworkreferences/data_visualization_guidelines.md - Data visualization best practicesreferences/action_recommendation_patterns.md - Action recommendation patternsassets/one_page_summary_template_[ja|en].md - One-page executive summaryassets/board_report_template_[ja|en].md - Board of Directors reportassets/management_meeting_template_[ja|en].md - Management meeting materialsassets/investor_briefing_template_[ja|en].md - Investor briefing documentClarify what you're trying to achieve and who will receive the document. This determines structure, depth, and tone.
Identify the primary objective:
| Purpose Type | Description | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Decision Request | Seeking approval or choice between options | Options, risks, recommendation |
| Status Report | Informing on progress or situation | Metrics, trends, deviations |
| Proposal | Advocating for an initiative or investment | Business case, ROI, timeline |
| Alert/Escalation | Raising awareness of risk or issue | Impact, urgency, mitigation |
Understand your audience's perspective:
| Audience | Time Available | Primary Concerns | Preferred Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEO | Very limited | Strategic impact, risks | One-page summary |
| Board of Directors | Limited | Governance, compliance, returns | Formal report |
| Executive Committee | Moderate | Cross-functional impact | Meeting materials |
| Investors | Moderate | Returns, growth, risks | Structured briefing |
Specify what should happen after reading:
After reviewing this document, the reader should:
1. Understand: [Key insight or situation]
2. Believe: [Core message or conclusion]
3. Do: [Specific action or decision]
Structure your message using the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework to ensure relevance and actionability.
Ask yourself: "Why should the executive care about this?"
Good Example:
"Customer churn increased 15% this quarter, putting $2.3M ARR at risk."
Bad Example:
"Customer churn increased 15% this quarter." (No impact stated)
Checklist:
Ask yourself: "Why does this need attention now?"
Good Example:
"Q4 budget lock is in 2 weeks; delay means 6-month postponement."
Bad Example:
"We should address this soon." (No specific timeline)
Urgency Triggers:
Ask yourself: "What specific action do you want?"
Good Example:
"Approve $150K for customer success program; implementation starts Dec 1."
Bad Example:
"We recommend improving customer retention." (No specific action)
Action Format:
[ACTION VERB] + [SPECIFIC THING] + [BY WHEN/HOW MUCH]
Examples:
- Approve the $2M capital expenditure for new facility
- Decide between Option A (in-house) or Option B (outsource)
- Authorize hiring of 3 additional engineers
Organize information using the Pyramid Principle and design the document structure.
Structure information from conclusion to supporting evidence:
Level 1: Main Message (Answer/Conclusion)
|
Level 2: Key Supporting Points (3-5 maximum)
|
Level 3: Evidence/Data (Only as needed)
Before (Chronological - Wrong):
"We analyzed customer feedback, then reviewed churn data, conducted interviews, and concluded that..."
After (Pyramid - Correct):
"Recommendation: Invest $500K in customer success. This will reduce churn by 20% based on three findings: [1] Exit interviews reveal..., [2] Data shows..., [3] Competitor analysis indicates..."
Every executive document needs a scannable first page:
+--------------------------------------------+
| [TITLE] - [DATE] |
+--------------------------------------------+
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (3-5 sentences) |
| - Core message with So What? |
| - Why Now? |
| - What Next? (Recommendation) |
+--------------------------------------------+
| KEY METRICS | SITUATION |
| +---+ +---+ +---+ | Current state |
| |KPI| |KPI| |KPI| | Key developments |
| +---+ +---+ +---+ | |
+--------------------------------------------+
| RECOMMENDATION / NEXT STEPS |
| 1. Specific action item |
| 2. Timeline |
| 3. Required resources |
+--------------------------------------------+
Based on audience and purpose, select additional sections:
| Section | When to Include |
|---|---|
| Background/Context | If audience lacks familiarity |
| Analysis Details | If methodology matters for credibility |
| Financial Breakdown | For investment decisions |
| Risk Assessment | For high-stakes decisions |
| Implementation Plan | For project approvals |
| Appendix | For reference data |
Present data in ways that support executive decision-making.
| Message Type | Recommended Chart | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Trend over time | Line chart, Area chart | Pie chart |
| Comparison | Bar chart (horizontal for many items) | 3D charts |
| Composition | Stacked bar, Treemap | Multiple pie charts |
| Distribution | Histogram, Box plot | Complex scatter |
| Relationship | Scatter plot, Bubble chart | Over-decorated visuals |
Rule 1: One Chart, One Message
Rule 2: Maximize Data-Ink Ratio
Rule 3: Use Consistent Formatting
Highlight what matters:
Revenue ($M)
^
3 -| .----- <- "New product launch"
| .-'
2 -| ---'
|
1 -|
+-----+-----+-----+-->
Q1 Q2 Q3
Present recommendations in a way that facilitates executive decision-making.
When presenting options, use consistent format:
| Criteria | Option A: Build | Option B: Buy | Option C: Partner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | $500K | $800K | $300K |
| Timeline | 6 months | 2 months | 3 months |
| Control | High | Medium | Low |
| Risk | Technical risk | Vendor dependency | IP exposure |
| Recommendation | Preferred |
Be explicit about what could go wrong:
Key Risks:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | Mitigation |
+-------------------+---------+------------+------------+
| Vendor delay | High | Medium | Milestone |
| | | | penalties |
| Cost overrun | Medium | Low | Fixed- |
| | | | price bid |
+------------------------------------------------------+
End with a clear request:
For Approval:
"Requesting approval to proceed with Option B at $800K budget. Authorization signature required below."
For Decision:
"Decision required by [date]: Select Option A, B, or C. If no decision by [date], project will be delayed by [impact]."
For Information:
"No action required. This report is for awareness. Questions can be directed to [contact]."
Generate the final document using templates and ensure executive-level quality.
Choose appropriate template based on audience and purpose:
Purpose: Board Report -> assets/board_report_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: Management Meeting -> assets/management_meeting_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: Investor Briefing -> assets/investor_briefing_template_[ja|en].md
Purpose: General Summary -> assets/one_page_summary_template_[ja|en].md
Fill in each section following the guidance in the template:
Before finalizing, verify:
Content Quality:
Format Quality:
Audience Alignment:
| Audience | Document Type | Template |
|---|---|---|
| CEO/C-Suite | Quick update | one_page_summary |
| Board of Directors | Formal proposal | board_report |
| Executive Committee | Working session | management_meeting |
| Investors/Analysts | Performance review | investor_briefing |
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。