Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
採用・人材戦略の専門スキル。職務記述書(JD)作成、採用計画策定、コンピテンシーモデル設計、 面接評価基準設計、オンボーディング計画をサポート。採用要件の明確化から内定後のフォローまで 一貫した人材獲得プロセスを支援。
日英両言語のテンプレートを提供し、グローバル採用にも対応。
Use when: creating job descriptions, designing competency models, planning recruitment strategies, developing interview evaluation criteria, or creating onboarding plans. Triggers: "JD作成", "採用計画", "面接評価", "オンボーディング", "コンピテンシー", "人材獲得", "job description", "recruitment plan", "interview evaluation", "hiring", "talent acquisition"
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
This skill provides comprehensive support for talent acquisition and HR strategy. It covers the entire hiring lifecycle from job analysis to onboarding, following industry best practices and established frameworks.
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| JD Creation | Create comprehensive job descriptions with competency requirements |
| Recruitment Planning | Design recruitment strategies with timelines and KPIs |
| Evaluation Design | Develop structured interview evaluation criteria using STAR method |
| Onboarding | Create 30-60-90 day onboarding plans with mentoring structure |
Creating a new position
Planning recruitment
Designing interviews
Building onboarding program
Use this workflow when creating or updating job descriptions for any position.
Collect essential information about the position:
| Category | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Basic Info | Position title, department, reporting line |
| Purpose | Why does this role exist? What problem does it solve? |
| Scope | Team size, budget responsibility, decision authority |
| Type | Full-time, part-time, contract, remote/hybrid/onsite |
Analyze the role's core responsibilities:
Primary Duties (60-80% of time)
Secondary Duties (20-40% of time)
Decision Authority
Create requirements using the MoSCoW method:
| Category | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Must Have | Non-negotiable requirements | 5+ years experience, specific certification |
| Should Have | Strongly preferred | Industry experience, leadership experience |
| Could Have | Nice to have | Additional languages, specific tools |
| Won't Have | Not required for this role | (Clarify to avoid over-qualified applicants) |
Reference: references/competency_model_guide.md
Define 4-6 competencies using this structure:
| Competency | Level | Behavioral Indicator |
|------------|-------|---------------------|
| Problem Solving | Advanced | Identifies root causes, proposes multiple solutions |
| Communication | Intermediate | Clearly explains technical concepts to non-technical audience |
| Leadership | Basic | Takes initiative, mentors junior team members |
Use template: assets/job_description_template_ja.md or assets/job_description_template_en.md
Quality Checklist:
Use this workflow when planning recruitment activities for one or multiple positions.
Analyze the recruitment requirements:
## Hiring Needs Analysis
| Dimension | Current State | Target State | Gap |
|-----------|--------------|--------------|-----|
| Headcount | [Current] | [Planned] | [Difference] |
| Skill Mix | [Current skills] | [Needed skills] | [Missing skills] |
| Timeline | - | [Target date] | - |
| Budget | - | [Available budget] | - |
Source Selection Matrix:
| Channel | Best For | Cost | Time to Hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Referrals | Culture fit, verified skills | Low ($) | Short |
| LinkedIn/Direct Sourcing | Passive candidates | Medium ($$) | Medium |
| Job Boards | Active job seekers | Low-Medium ($-$$) | Short |
| Recruitment Agencies | Executive/specialized roles | High ($$$) | Medium |
| Campus Recruiting | Entry-level positions | Medium ($$) | Seasonal |
Standard Recruitment Timeline:
gantt
title Recruitment Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Planning
Needs Analysis :a1, 2025-01-01, 5d
JD Creation :a2, after a1, 3d
section Sourcing
Job Posting :b1, after a2, 2d
Active Sourcing :b2, after a2, 14d
section Selection
Resume Screening :c1, after b1, 7d
First Interview :c2, after c1, 10d
Second Interview :c3, after c2, 7d
Final Interview :c4, after c3, 5d
section Closing
Offer :d1, after c4, 3d
Negotiation :d2, after d1, 5d
Acceptance :d3, after d2, 3d
Reference: references/recruitment_best_practices.md
Key Recruitment Metrics:
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Fill | Days from job posting to acceptance | < 45 days |
| Time to Hire | Days from first contact to acceptance | < 30 days |
| Cost per Hire | Total recruitment cost / hires | Industry benchmark |
| Quality of Hire | Performance rating at 6/12 months | > 3.5/5.0 |
| Offer Acceptance Rate | Accepted offers / total offers | > 85% |
| Source Effectiveness | Hires per source / cost per source | Track by channel |
Budget Template:
| Category | Item | Unit Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advertising | Job boards | $X | Y posts | $XY |
| Sourcing | LinkedIn Recruiter | $X/month | Y months | $XY |
| Agency Fees | Contingency (20%) | $X × 0.20 | Y hires | $XY |
| Assessment | Tools/tests | $X/candidate | Y candidates | $XY |
| Interview | Expenses | $X | Y candidates | $XY |
| Total | $XXXX |
Use this workflow to create structured interview processes with objective evaluation criteria.
Design a multi-stage interview process:
| Stage | Purpose | Duration | Interviewers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phone Screen | Basic qualifications, motivation | 20-30 min | Recruiter |
| Technical Interview | Skills assessment | 45-60 min | Hiring Manager + Technical |
| Behavioral Interview | Culture fit, competencies | 45-60 min | HR + Team Lead |
| Final Interview | Executive alignment | 30-45 min | Senior Leadership |
Reference: references/interview_methodology.md
STAR Method Framework:
For each competency, prepare questions that elicit STAR responses:
## Competency: Problem Solving
**Question**: Tell me about a time when you faced a complex problem with no clear solution.
**STAR Components to Listen For:**
- **Situation**: Context and complexity of the problem
- **Task**: Their specific responsibility
- **Action**: Steps they took to solve it
- **Result**: Outcome and learnings
**Behavioral Indicators (1-5 scale):**
1. Cannot provide clear example
2. Basic problem identification
3. Logical approach with some structure
4. Systematic analysis with creative solutions
5. Strategic thinking with measurable impact
Create a scoring matrix:
| Competency | Weight | 1-Poor | 2-Below | 3-Meets | 4-Exceeds | 5-Exceptional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Skills | 30% | Lacks basics | Some gaps | Meets requirements | Strong skills | Expert level |
| Problem Solving | 25% | No examples | Weak approach | Logical process | Creative solutions | Strategic impact |
| Communication | 20% | Unclear | Occasionally unclear | Clear and concise | Excellent clarity | Inspiring communicator |
| Leadership | 15% | None shown | Limited | Some initiative | Strong influence | Transforms teams |
| Culture Fit | 10% | Misaligned | Partial fit | Good alignment | Strong alignment | Culture enhancer |
Use template: assets/interview_evaluation_sheet_ja.md or assets/interview_evaluation_sheet_en.md
Evaluation Sheet Sections:
Candidate Information
Technical/Skill Assessment
Competency Assessment
Red Flags / Concerns
Overall Recommendation
Interview Debrief Agenda:
Independent Scoring First (5 min)
Round Robin Feedback (15 min)
Discussion & Calibration (10 min)
Final Decision (5 min)
Use this workflow to create comprehensive onboarding programs for new hires.
Checklist (Before Day 1):
| Category | Task | Owner | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | |||
| Employment contract signed | HR | -5 days | |
| Background check completed | HR | -3 days | |
| Payroll setup | Finance | -1 day | |
| IT Setup | |||
| Laptop/equipment ordered | IT | -10 days | |
| Email account created | IT | -3 days | |
| Access permissions configured | IT | -1 day | |
| Software licenses assigned | IT | -1 day | |
| Workspace | |||
| Desk/workspace assigned | Facilities | -5 days | |
| Welcome kit prepared | HR | -1 day | |
| Business cards ordered | Admin | -7 days | |
| Communication | |||
| Welcome email sent | HR | -3 days | |
| Team notified | Hiring Manager | -3 days | |
| Buddy assigned | Hiring Manager | -5 days |
Use template: assets/onboarding_plan_template_ja.md or assets/onboarding_plan_template_en.md
Sample Day 1 Agenda:
| Time | Activity | Owner | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09:00-09:30 | Welcome & Building Tour | HR | Lobby |
| 09:30-10:30 | Paperwork & Policy Review | HR | HR Office |
| 10:30-11:00 | IT Setup & Security | IT | Desk |
| 11:00-12:00 | Company Overview Presentation | HR | Conference Room |
| 12:00-13:00 | Team Lunch | Hiring Manager | TBD |
| 13:00-14:00 | Department Introduction | Hiring Manager | Team Area |
| 14:00-15:00 | Role & Expectations Discussion | Hiring Manager | Office |
| 15:00-16:00 | System Access & Training | Buddy | Desk |
| 16:00-17:00 | First Assignment & Questions | Hiring Manager | Office |
Phase 1: Learning (Days 1-30)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orientation | Meet team, understand structure, setup tools | Completed onboarding checklist |
| 2 | Learning | Shadow meetings, read documentation, training | Passed required training |
| 3 | Exploration | Understand workflows, identify stakeholders | Map of key processes |
| 4 | Integration | Attend team meetings, contribute to discussions | Active participation observed |
Phase 2: Contributing (Days 31-60)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-6 | Small Wins | Complete first independent tasks | Delivered first output |
| 7-8 | Building | Take on increasing responsibility | Positive feedback from team |
Phase 3: Performing (Days 61-90)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-10 | Ownership | Own projects or processes | Managing work independently |
| 11-12 | Impact | Deliver measurable results | Met initial performance goals |
Support Network:
| Role | Person | Responsibility | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mentor | [Senior colleague] | Career guidance, skill development | Weekly 1:1 |
| Buddy | [Peer colleague] | Day-to-day questions, cultural navigation | Daily check-ins (Week 1-2) |
| Manager | [Hiring Manager] | Performance, goals, feedback | Weekly 1:1 |
| HR Partner | [HR Business Partner] | Policy questions, concerns | As needed |
Formal Check-ins:
| Timing | Owner | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | HR | Administrative completion | Onboarding checklist signed |
| Week 1 | Manager | First impressions, questions | Adjust plan if needed |
| Day 30 | Manager + HR | 30-day review | Progress report |
| Day 60 | Manager | Mid-point check | Course correction |
| Day 90 | Manager + HR | Probation review | Performance confirmation |
| Template | Language | Use For |
|---|---|---|
job_description_template_ja.md | Japanese | JD creation (domestic) |
job_description_template_en.md | English | JD creation (global) |
interview_evaluation_sheet_ja.md | Japanese | Interview evaluation (domestic) |
interview_evaluation_sheet_en.md | English | Interview evaluation (global) |
onboarding_plan_template_ja.md | Japanese | Onboarding program (domestic) |
onboarding_plan_template_en.md | English | Onboarding program (global) |
| Example | Description |
|---|---|
software_engineer_jd.md | Software Engineer JD with technical competencies |
sales_representative_jd.md | Sales position with commercial competencies |
engineering_manager_jd.md | Manager role with leadership competencies |
| Guide | Content |
|---|---|
competency_model_guide.md | Competency framework design methodology |
interview_methodology.md | STAR method, structured interview best practices |
recruitment_best_practices.md | Sourcing, metrics, candidate experience |
| Issue | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Too many unqualified applicants | JD requirements unclear | Clarify must-haves, add screening questions |
| Candidates declining offers | Slow process, poor experience | Reduce time-to-hire, improve communication |
| High early turnover | Role mismatch, poor onboarding | Realistic job previews, structured onboarding |
| Interview bias | Unstructured interviews | Use competency-based questions, diverse panels |
| New hire underperformance | Unclear expectations | Clear 30-60-90 plan, regular feedback |
Context: Series A startup needs to hire 5 engineers in Q1
How This Skill Helps:
Context: Fortune 500 company hiring Engineering Manager
How This Skill Helps:
Context: Japanese company opening US office
How This Skill Helps:
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。