Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Creates 4 core project docs (requirements.md, architecture.md, tech_stack.md, patterns_catalog.md). ALWAYS created.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
L3 Worker that creates 4 core project documentation files. These are ALWAYS created regardless of project type.
From coordinator:
contextStore: Full Context Store with all discovered data
legacy_architecture: { layers[], components[], diagrams[], data_flow }legacy_requirements: { functional[], non_functional[], user_stories[] }legacy_tech_stack: { frontend, backend, database, versions }targetDir: Project root directoryLEGACY_CONTENT is used as base content when creating documents. Priority: Legacy > Auto-discovery > Template defaults.
| File | Target Sections | Questions | Auto-Discovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| docs/project/requirements.md | Functional Requirements (FR-XXX-NNN format) | Q23 | Low |
| docs/project/architecture.md | 11 arc42 sections with C4 diagrams | Q24-Q34 | High |
| docs/project/tech_stack.md | Frontend, Backend, Database, Additional | Q35-Q38 | High |
| docs/architecture/patterns_catalog.md | Pattern summary, 4-score model, trend tracking | — | High |
For each document (requirements.md, architecture.md, tech_stack.md, patterns_catalog.md):
references/templates/architecture.md: If LEGACY_CONTENT.legacy_architecture exists:
legacy_architecture.layers[] for "## Building Block View" (Section 5)legacy_architecture.components[] for component descriptionslegacy_architecture.diagrams[] for existing diagrams (preserve mermaid/images)legacy_architecture.data_flow for "## Runtime View" (Section 6)<!-- Migrated from legacy documentation --> at top of merged sectionsrequirements.md: If LEGACY_CONTENT.legacy_requirements exists:
legacy_requirements.functional[] as base for FR-XXX requirementslegacy_requirements.user_stories[] if FR format not foundtech_stack.md: If LEGACY_CONTENT.legacy_tech_stack exists:
legacy_tech_stack.versions as base for technology versionslegacy_tech_stack.rationale for decision explanationspatterns_catalog.md:
shared/templates/patterns_template.md<!-- Auto-detected by ln-112, audit with ln-640 -->{{PLACEHOLDER}} with Context Store values[TBD: X] for missing dataFor each created document:
Return to coordinator:
{
"created": ["docs/project/requirements.md", ...],
"skipped": [],
"tbd_count": 5,
"validation": "OK",
"diagrams_generated": 3
}
[TBD: X] for missing dataDocuments describe contracts and decisions, NOT implementations:
<!-- NO_CODE_EXAMPLES: ... --> tag - FOLLOW ITTables > Mermaid/ASCII diagrams > Lists > Text
references/templates/requirements_template.md, architecture_template.md, tech_stack_template.mdshared/templates/patterns_template.mdreferences/questions_core.md (Q23-Q38)Version: 2.2.0 Last Updated: 2025-01-12
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。