跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

cdn-cache-purge-tests

Wraps CDN cache-purge testing patterns for Cloudflare (POST /zones/{zone_id}/purge_cache, single-file / everything / cache-tags / hostname / prefix), Fastly (POST purge-by-key / purge-all, surrogate-keys via Surrogate-Key header), and CloudFront (CreateInvalidation API + paths). Covers end-to-end test patterns (write origin → trigger purge → assert edge serves fresh), purge-propagation delay testing (typically 1-30s globally), surrogate-key + cache-tag patterns for group-purge, and Cache-Status header verification (cf-cache-status: HIT/MISS/BYPASS). Also owns the client tier: browser-side Cache-Control verification with Playwright (served-from-cache via CDP, ETag 304 round-trips, Workbox service-worker strategies, reload semantics) in references/browser-cache-control.md. Use when designing or auditing CDN cache-invalidation workflows or browser-tier caching behaviour in E2E tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md9.4 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json1.0 KB
  • references/browser-cache-control.md4.4 KB
  • references/playwright-cache-recipes.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

cdn-cache-purge-tests

Overview

CDN cache-purge tests verify that the write-origin-then-invalidate-edge sequence works end-to-end - the most-likely-broken cache integration in real deployments.

Per developers.cloudflare.com/cache/how-to/purge-cache/, Cloudflare offers five purge methods (Single-file, Everything, Cache-tags, Hostname, Prefix). Fastly's surrogate-key pattern and CloudFront's invalidation API offer similar shapes.

When to use

  • Verifying a new purge integration works end-to-end.
  • Regression-testing the write-origin-then-purge sequence.
  • Auditing existing purge logic before a deploy.
  • Investigating "users see stale content after a write."

Authoring

Cloudflare - purge by URL

curl -X POST \
  "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/${ZONE_ID}/purge_cache" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${CF_API_TOKEN}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data '{"files":["https://example.com/api/users/1"]}'

Response:

{ "success": true, "result": { "id": "...." } }

Cloudflare - purge by cache-tag (Enterprise)

curl -X POST "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/${ZONE_ID}/purge_cache" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ${CF_API_TOKEN}" \
  --data '{"tags":["user-1","posts-feed"]}'

The response headers from the origin must have included Cache-Tag: user-1, posts-feed for this to work.

Fastly - purge by surrogate-key

curl -X POST "https://api.fastly.com/service/${SERVICE_ID}/purge/${SURROGATE_KEY}" \
  -H "Fastly-Key: ${FASTLY_API_TOKEN}"

Origin responses include Surrogate-Key: user-1 posts-feed (space-separated).

CloudFront - invalidation

aws cloudfront create-invalidation \
  --distribution-id ${DIST_ID} \
  --paths "/api/users/1" "/api/users/1/*"

Cloud-side wait + propagation. Returns an InvalidationId; poll status via get-invalidation.

Running - end-to-end test

The canonical purge test:

import requests, time

def test_write_then_purge_serves_fresh():
    # 1. Origin write
    origin_response = requests.post(
        "https://origin.example.com/api/users/1",
        json={"name": "Alice"},
        headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {ADMIN_TOKEN}"},
    )
    assert origin_response.status_code == 200

    # 2. Verify edge has the *old* value (might or might not - cache hit)
    edge_before = requests.get("https://example.com/api/users/1")
    cache_status_before = edge_before.headers.get("cf-cache-status")

    # 3. Trigger purge
    purge = requests.post(
        f"https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/{ZONE_ID}/purge_cache",
        headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {CF_API_TOKEN}"},
        json={"files": ["https://example.com/api/users/1"]},
    )
    assert purge.json()["success"]

    # 4. Wait for global propagation (Cloudflare typically <30s)
    time.sleep(10)

    # 5. Verify edge fetches fresh from origin
    edge_after = requests.get("https://example.com/api/users/1")
    cache_status_after = edge_after.headers.get("cf-cache-status")

    # Either MISS (just fetched) or HIT (re-cached fresh value)
    assert cache_status_after in ("MISS", "HIT", "EXPIRED")
    assert edge_after.json()["name"] == "Alice"

Cache-Status header verification

HeaderCDNCommon values
cf-cache-statusCloudflareHIT, MISS, EXPIRED, BYPASS, DYNAMIC, REVALIDATED
x-cacheFastlyHIT, MISS, HIT-CLUSTER, HIT-CLUSTER-WAIT
x-cacheCloudFrontHit from cloudfront, Miss from cloudfront
ageRFC 9111 standardSeconds since cached

Multi-region propagation

EDGES = [
    "https://example.com",     # default
    "https://eu.example.com",  # geo-routed
    "https://ap.example.com",
]

def test_purge_propagates_globally():
    # Pre-cache in each region
    for url in EDGES:
        requests.get(url + "/api/users/1")

    # Trigger purge
    purge_url(API, "/api/users/1")

    # Wait for global propagation
    time.sleep(30)

    # Verify each region serves fresh
    for url in EDGES:
        r = requests.get(url + "/api/users/1")
        assert r.json()["name"] == "Alice"

Client-tier cache-control

The purge test proves the edge refreshes; the client tier can still serve stale from the browser's own cache. Browser-side verification - asserting the browser acts on Cache-Control as intended (served-from-cache via CDP, ETag If-None-Match → 304 round-trips, Workbox service-worker strategies, normal-vs-hard reload semantics) with Playwright across the Chromium / Firefox / WebKit matrix - is in references/browser-cache-control.md, with deeper recipes in references/playwright-cache-recipes.md. Asserting only which header the server emits needs no browser - keep that in the project's HTTP-level runner.

Parsing results

FieldUse
cf-cache-status: HITServed from edge cache
cf-cache-status: MISSOrigin pull just happened
cf-cache-status: EXPIREDStale; revalidated from origin
cf-cache-status: BYPASSCache deliberately skipped (e.g., uncacheable response)
cf-cache-status: DYNAMICNot cached at all
age: NPer RFC 9111: seconds since cached

For tests: assert on the transition (HIT → MISS after purge), not on the absolute state.

CI integration

jobs:
  cdn-purge-smoke:
    if: github.event_name == 'deployment_status' && github.event.deployment_status.state == 'success'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - name: Write to origin
        env:
          ADMIN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.ADMIN_TOKEN }}
        run: ./scripts/write-test-fixture.sh
      - name: Purge edge
        env:
          CF_API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CF_API_TOKEN }}
        run: ./scripts/purge-test-paths.sh
      - name: Verify edge serves fresh
        run: pytest tests/cdn/test_purge_propagation.py

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
time.sleep(60) between purge + assertionSlow; sometimes shorter / sometimes longerPoll cf-cache-status until MISS (timeout 30s)
Test purge against prodPollutes prod cache; rate-limitedDedicated test domain + zone
Purge-everything for smoke testMassive cache flush; alarming for opsSingle-file or tag-based
Don't test multi-regionEdge in test region; user in another sees staleVerify across regions
No Cache-Tag / Surrogate-Key on originGroup-purge has nothing to targetOrigin must set tags
Use only cf-cache-status to verify freshCould be HIT of newly-purged fresh fetchCompare response body to known fresh state
Skip purge-key naming reviewHot keys (all, feed) become noisyPer-resource tagging strategy
Assume purge is synchronousCloudflare: <30s; CloudFront: minutesPlan for async; poll

Limitations

  • Per-vendor behaviour differs. Cloudflare and Fastly purge in seconds; CloudFront invalidations take longer. Test against the actual vendor in use.
  • Purge rate limits. Cloudflare has per-zone tag-purge limits; Fastly has API-call rate limits. Tests can hit these.
  • Edge node consistency. Even within a CDN, edge nodes refresh at slightly different times. Cross-edge tests need tolerance.
  • Doesn't test the origin's behaviour. If origin sends uncacheable responses, purge does nothing. Pair with origin Cache-Control assertions in the project's HTTP-level runner and the browser-tier tests in references/browser-cache-control.md.

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题