跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

chaos-mesh

Configures Chaos Mesh for Kubernetes-native chaos engineering - picks fault types (PodChaos, NetworkChaos, StressChaos, IOChaos, TimeChaos, DNSChaos, KernelChaos, HTTPChaos), targets via label selectors, controls blast radius via namespace whitelists + selector filters, schedules via CronJobs, observes via dashboard. Distinct from Litmus by architecture (Chaos Mesh has its own dashboard + workflow orchestration; Litmus uses ChaosCenter UI). Use when the target system runs on Kubernetes and fault experiments should be declared as CRDs in the cluster alongside the workloads they target.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
集成工具KubernetesDatadog

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json717 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

chaos-mesh

Overview

Per chaos-mesh-home:

"Chaos Mesh is a platform that 'brings various types of fault simulation to Kubernetes and has an enormous capability to orchestrate fault scenarios.'"

Per chaos-mesh-home, Chaos Mesh leverages "Kubernetes CustomResourceDefinitions (CRDs) for seamless integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem."

When to use

  • The platform is Kubernetes.
  • The team wants CRD-native chaos with a built-in dashboard.
  • Workflow orchestration matters (sequence + parallel experiments).
  • Physical machine support needed (Chaosd extension).

If LitmusChaos is already deployed, evaluate stack-fit before adding Chaos Mesh - both serve similar use cases with different ergonomics.

Step 1 - Install

Install with Helm, per Chaos Mesh Helm install (pin the chart --version you have validated; the docs recommend the chaos-mesh namespace):

helm repo add chaos-mesh https://charts.chaos-mesh.org
helm install chaos-mesh chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh -n chaos-mesh --create-namespace --version 2.6.3

Avoid piping the mirror's install.sh into a shell: it runs unreviewed remote code with your cluster credentials.

Per chaos-mesh-home, "no special dependencies required - Chaos Mesh deploys directly on Kubernetes clusters, including minikube and kind."

Step 2 - Fault types

Per chaos-mesh-home:

CRDEffect
PodChaosPod kill, container kill, pod failure
NetworkChaosLatency, packet loss, partition, bandwidth, corruption
StressChaosCPU stress, memory stress
IOChaosDisk read/write delay, errors
TimeChaosClock skew
DNSChaosDNS lookup failures
KernelChaosKernel-level fault injection
HTTPChaosHTTP request fault injection
JVMChaosJVM-level (exception, GC pause, method delay)

Plus Schedule for cron-style + Workflow for orchestration.

Step 3 - Author a NetworkChaos

apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: NetworkChaos
metadata:
  name: checkout-network-latency
  namespace: app
spec:
  action: delay
  mode: one                    # or 'all', 'fixed', 'fixed-percent', 'random-max-percent'
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - app
    labelSelectors:
      app: checkout
  delay:
    latency: '500ms'
    correlation: '50'
    jitter: '50ms'
  duration: '5m'

Per chaos-mesh-home, Chaos Mesh provides "selector-based filtering using labels, annotations, and namespace whitelists to control 'blast radius' and target specific resources."

Step 4 - Author a PodChaos

apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
  name: checkout-pod-kill
  namespace: app
spec:
  action: pod-kill
  mode: fixed-percent
  value: '50'
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - app
    labelSelectors:
      app: checkout
  duration: '60s'

mode: fixed-percent + value: '50' kills 50% of matching pods.

Step 5 - Workflow orchestration

Per chaos-mesh-home: "Workflow Orchestration: Users can combine serial and parallel experiments to simulate complex, realistic failure scenarios matching actual system architecture."

apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
  name: checkout-resilience-test
  namespace: app
spec:
  entry: combined-chaos
  templates:
    - name: combined-chaos
      templateType: Serial
      deadline: 30m
      children:
        - network-latency-step
        - then-pod-kill-step
        - then-stress-step
    - name: network-latency-step
      templateType: NetworkChaos
      networkChaos:
        action: delay
        mode: all
        selector: { ... }
        delay: { latency: 200ms }
        duration: 5m
    - name: then-pod-kill-step
      templateType: PodChaos
      podChaos:
        action: pod-kill
        mode: one
        selector: { ... }
    - name: then-stress-step
      templateType: StressChaos
      stressChaos:
        mode: all
        selector: { ... }
        stressors:
          cpu: { workers: 4, load: 80 }
        duration: 3m

Step 6 - Dashboard

Per chaos-mesh-home, Chaos Mesh ships a dashboard with RBAC.

kubectl port-forward -n chaos-mesh svc/chaos-dashboard 2333:2333
# Open http://localhost:2333

The dashboard provides authoring (visual experiment construction), running, observability, and replay.

Step 7 - Run + verdict

kubectl apply -f checkout-network-latency.yaml

# Watch state
kubectl get networkchaos checkout-network-latency -w

# Status / events
kubectl describe networkchaos checkout-network-latency

The chaos resource lifecycle is Created → Running → Stopped. Pair with external monitoring (Datadog / Prometheus / Grafana) to verify the steady-state hypothesis held.

Step 8 - Physical machine support

Per chaos-mesh-home: "Physical Machine Support: Chaosd (experimental) extends chaos testing to non-Kubernetes environments through PhysicalMachineChaos resources."

For VM / bare-metal targets:

apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PhysicalMachineChaos
metadata:
  name: vm-cpu-stress
spec:
  action: stress-cpu
  address:
    - 'http://10.0.0.5:31767'
  duration: 5m
  stress-cpu:
    load: 80
    workers: 4

The Chaosd agent runs on the target VM; the K8s CRD remotely triggers it.

Step 9 - CI integration

- name: Trigger chaos experiment
  run: |
    kubectl apply -f experiments/checkout-network-latency.yaml
    sleep 320  # 5min duration + buffer
    kubectl delete -f experiments/checkout-network-latency.yaml
- name: Check steady-state from Datadog
  run: ./scripts/datadog-verdict.sh

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
mode: all without scopeAll matching pods affected; blast radius too wide.Start with mode: one or fixed-percent: 25.
No durationChaos persists until manual cleanup; risky.Always set duration (Step 3 example).
Targeting chaos-mesh namespaceCrashes the chaos infrastructure itself.Whitelist app namespace; deny-list chaos-mesh.
Disable RBAC on dashboardAnyone with cluster access can trigger chaos.Per chaos-mesh-home: RBAC is on by default - keep it on.
Skipping observability integrationChaos runs but verdict invisible.Wire dashboard + external monitoring.

Limitations

  • Kubernetes only (mostly). Chaosd is experimental; non-K8s is second-class.
  • Per-tool incompatibility. Chaos Mesh CRDs aren't Litmus ChaosEngines.
  • JVM / language-specific chaos. Available but requires agent installation in the target.
  • Resource overhead. Chaos controller + dashboard pods cost cluster resources.

References

  • cm - Chaos Mesh overview: K8s-native, fault types, selector-based blast-radius control, workflow orchestration, dashboard with RBAC, Chaosd for physical machines.
  • cm-helm - Helm install: helm repo add chaos-mesh, recommended chaos-mesh namespace, --version pinning.
  • LitmusChaos (references/litmus.md in chaos-experiment-author) - sibling K8s alternative.
  • Gremlin (references/gremlin.md in chaos-experiment-author) - multi-platform commercial alternative.
  • chaos-experiment-author - methodology this tool implements.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题