跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

fast-check-testing

Authors property-based tests in JavaScript / TypeScript using fast-check - wires `fc.assert(fc.property(arbitrary, ...))`, picks arbitraries (`fc.integer`, `fc.string`, `fc.array`, `fc.tuple`, `fc.record`), uses `.map()` / `.chain()` / `.filter()` to build domain arbitraries, and integrates with Jest / Vitest / Mocha / Jasmine / AVA / Tape. Use when a JS/TS codebase needs PBT to catch edge cases - fast-check has been used to find bugs in major libraries (`query-string`, etc.) and is trusted by Jest, Jasmine, fp-ts, Ramda.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(11)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json662 B
  • evals/async-memo-property/criteria.json2.8 KB
  • evals/async-memo-property/task.md2.1 KB
  • evals/csv-roundtrip/criteria.json3.1 KB
  • evals/csv-roundtrip/task.md2.2 KB
  • evals/email-arbitrary-choice/criteria.json2.8 KB
  • evals/email-arbitrary-choice/task.md2.0 KB
  • references/arbitraries.md2.7 KB
  • references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md701 B
  • references/stateful-and-async.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

fast-check-testing

Overview

fast-check is "a property-based testing framework for JavaScript and TypeScript, inspired by QuickCheck" (fast-check-readme).

It's runner-agnostic (fast-check-overview): "Test Runner Agnostic: Works seamlessly with Jest, Mocha, Vitest, and other testing frameworks without special integration."

When to use

  • A JS/TS codebase has functions with non-trivial input shapes (parsers, serializers, validators, data transforms).
  • Async code where race conditions hide; fast-check supports race condition detection (fast-check-overview).
  • Round-trip / metamorphic properties hold (encode(decode(x)) === x).
  • Existing example-based tests pass but production bugs keep appearing in edge cases not covered.

Install

Per fast-check-readme:

npm install fast-check --save-dev
# or
yarn add fast-check --dev
# or
pnpm add -D fast-check

Basic property

Per fast-check-readme, the canonical Mocha-style example:

import fc from 'fast-check';

const contains = (text, pattern) => text.indexOf(pattern) >= 0;

describe('properties', () => {
  it('should always contain itself', () => {
    fc.assert(fc.property(fc.string(), (text) => contains(text, text)));
  });

  it('should always contain its substrings', () => {
    fc.assert(
      fc.property(fc.string(), fc.string(), fc.string(), (a, b, c) => {
        return contains(a + b + c, b);
      })
    );
  });
});

The shape: fc.assert(fc.property(<arbitraries...>, (...inputs) => <predicate>)).

The predicate returns:

  • true → the property holds.
  • false → the property fails.
  • Throws an exception → the property fails (typical for expect(...) style assertions).

fc.assert runs the property with 100 generated cases by default; on failure, fast-check shrinks to the minimal counterexample.

Arbitraries and composite inputs

Pick arbitraries that match the input domain, build domain values with .map() / .chain(), and assemble objects with fc.record. Full catalog and combinator patterns: references/arbitraries.md. Prefer constrained arbitraries (fc.integer({ min: 1 }), fc.emailAddress()) over broad ones filtered down.

Integrate with the test runner

Per fast-check-overview: works "with major testing frameworks including Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Jasmine, AVA, and Tape" without special integration.

// Jest / Vitest example
import { test, expect } from 'vitest';
import fc from 'fast-check';

test('reverse is involutive', () => {
  fc.assert(
    fc.property(fc.array(fc.integer()), (arr) => {
      expect([...arr].reverse().reverse()).toEqual(arr);
    })
  );
});

The assertion library (expect, assert) is the runner's; fast-check hooks into thrown errors as failures. For async properties use await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)).

Shrinking and reproducibility

On failure fast-check prints the shrunk counterexample plus a seed; replaying that seed reproduces the failure deterministically, and a fixed CI seed keeps runs stable. Output format, replay, and CI seed: references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md.

Stateful and async testing

For concurrent code use fc.scheduler race-condition detection; for stateful systems use command-sequence model-based testing with fc.commands / fc.modelRun. Both patterns: references/stateful-and-async.md.

How to use

  1. Install fast-check as a dev dependency (npm install fast-check --save-dev).
  2. Identify a property that holds for all inputs (round-trip, invariant, metamorphic) rather than a single example.
  3. Pick arbitraries matching the input domain from references/arbitraries.md; prefer constrained arbitraries over .filter().
  4. Wire fc.assert(fc.property(<arbitraries...>, (...inputs) => <predicate>)); the predicate returns false or throws on violation.
  5. Run under the existing runner (Jest / Vitest / Mocha / ...); for async use await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)).
  6. On failure, read the shrunk counterexample and replay its seed to reproduce - see references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md.
  7. Verify: after fixing the cause, re-run the property and confirm it passes all 100 generated cases, and replay the failing seed to confirm the counterexample is gone; if it still fails, the fix is incomplete or the property itself is wrong - correct and re-run.
  8. For stateful or concurrent code, escalate to model-based testing or fc.scheduler - references/stateful-and-async.md.

Worked example

A codec exposes encode(obj) and decode(str) and claims decode(encode(x)) === x for every payload.

  1. Model the input with a composite arbitrary (references/arbitraries.md):
import fc from 'fast-check';
import { encode, decode } from './codec';

const payload = fc.record({
  id: fc.uuid(),
  count: fc.integer({ min: 0 }),
  tags: fc.uniqueArray(fc.string()),
});
  1. Assert the round-trip under Vitest:
test('decode reverses encode', () => {
  fc.assert(
    fc.property(payload, (x) => {
      expect(decode(encode(x))).toEqual(x);
    })
  );
});
  1. encode silently drops empty-string tags, so the run fails and fast-check shrinks to the minimal offending input:
Property failed after 12 tests
{ seed: 42, path: "11:0", endOnFailure: true }
Counterexample: [{"id":"...","count":0,"tags":[""]}]
  1. Replaying { seed: 42, path: "11:0" } reproduces it every time (references/shrinking-and-reproducibility.md). Fix encode to preserve empty tags; the property then passes all 100 cases.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Random CI seedProperty fails on CI, passes locally; hard to reproduce.Fixed seed in CI (shrinking-and-reproducibility.md).
Heavy .filter() on broad arbitrariesGeneration slow; many cases discarded.Constrained arbitraries (arbitraries.md).
Asserting on specific values inside the propertyDefeats PBT; that's an example test.Properties assert relationships; examples go elsewhere.
Mocking dependencies inside the propertyMocks don't satisfy properties.Test pure functions; integration tests for the rest.
fc.assert(fc.property(...)) without await for async propsTest passes incorrectly (Promise rejected silently).await fc.assert(fc.asyncProperty(...)).
Generating an fc.string() for an email fieldWastes generation budget; mostly invalid.fc.emailAddress() (arbitraries.md).
One mega-property that asserts 5 thingsWhen it fails, hard to know which thing.One property per logical assertion.

Limitations

  • Shrinking time. Complex arbitraries (deeply nested records) can take 30+ seconds to shrink. Use endOnFailure: true to short-circuit when the unshrunk case is sufficient.
  • Type inference for composite records. TypeScript's inference on fc.record({ ... }) can produce unhelpful types; explicit type annotations help.
  • Race-condition detection has cost. fc.scheduler explores interleavings exhaustively; for many-task tests, runtime grows fast.
  • No formal proof. 100 cases is convention; non-trivial domains may need more.

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题