跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

gitleaks-scanning

Configures and runs gitleaks - Go-based secret scanner with `gitleaks git` (scan local git via `git log -p`), `gitleaks dir` (filesystem), `gitleaks stdin` (pipe); 100+ built-in rules + custom rules in `.gitleaks.toml` ([[rules]] with regex / entropy / keywords / tags); allowlist via [[rules.allowlists]] (commits / paths / stopwords); pre-commit hook + GitHub Action integration; plus baseline management for legacy debt - onboarding a repo with historical findings via `--baseline-path` snapshots, `.gitleaksignore`, cross-tool suppression consistency with TruffleHog, and rot-prevention cadence. Use when the team needs OSS secret scanning at commit time + CI gate, or is adopting scanning on a repo with pre-existing findings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(14)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json865 B
  • evals/auditor-wants-proof-one-suppression-hides-one-key/criteria.json6.5 KB
  • evals/auditor-wants-proof-one-suppression-hides-one-key/task.md8.6 KB
  • evals/custom-rule-quietly-replaced-the-default-ruleset/criteria.json7.4 KB
  • evals/custom-rule-quietly-replaced-the-default-ruleset/task.md14.6 KB
  • evals/every-pr-red-since-scanning-went-live/criteria.json6.9 KB
  • evals/every-pr-red-since-scanning-went-live/task.md10.9 KB
  • evals/hook-blamed-for-a-commit-it-never-ran-on/criteria.json6.6 KB
  • evals/hook-blamed-for-a-commit-it-never-ran-on/task.md8.0 KB
  • evals/researcher-found-a-key-our-green-job-never-saw/criteria.json7.4 KB
  • evals/researcher-found-a-key-our-green-job-never-saw/task.md14.7 KB
  • references/baseline.md4.7 KB
  • references/custom-rules-and-triage.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

gitleaks-scanning

Command-API note (v8.19.0+): Per gl-gh, "v8.19.0 deprecated detect and protect commands, though they remain available." Current scanning modes:

CommandUse
gitleaks git <repo>Scan local git repository using git log -p
gitleaks dir <path>Scan directories and files (no git history)
gitleaks stdinStream data via pipe

Use git for git-aware scans (fastest, history-rewinding); dir for non-git (e.g., extracted CI artifact); stdin for diff-piping.

When to use

  • The team needs pre-commit + CI secret scanning.
  • A migration from a private-repo-history audit (catch secrets ever committed; not just current state).
  • Custom rule library for org-internal secret formats (internal API key prefixes, etc.).
  • Layered with trufflehog-scanning for live-validation cross-check.

How to use

  1. Install gitleaks (Step 1); confirm with gitleaks version.
  2. Run a full-history baseline scan: gitleaks git (Step 2).
  3. Add .gitleaks.toml with [extend] useDefault = true plus any org-internal custom rules (Step 3 - 4, references/custom-rules-and-triage.md).
  4. Triage findings: rotate real leaks, allowlist genuine false-positives with a Re-review-date (Step 5, references file).
  5. Wire the pre-commit hook for fast local feedback (Step 6).
  6. Add the CI job with fetch-depth: 0 as the catch-net gate (Step 7).
  7. On any confirmed leak, rotate the credential first, then scrub (Step 8).

Step 1 - Install

Per gl-gh:

# Homebrew
brew install gitleaks

# Docker
docker pull zricethezav/gitleaks:latest
docker run -v ${PWD}:/path zricethezav/gitleaks:latest git /path

# From source
git clone https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks.git
cd gitleaks
make build

Step 2 - Basic scans

# Scan current git repo (full history)
gitleaks git

# Scan a specific dir (no git)
gitleaks dir ./services/

# Stream + scan (e.g., scan a PR diff)
git diff main..HEAD | gitleaks stdin

# Output formats
gitleaks git --report-format json --report-path leaks.json
gitleaks git --report-format sarif --report-path leaks.sarif
gitleaks git --report-format csv --report-path leaks.csv

For PR-time scanning (faster - only check what changed):

gitleaks git --log-opts="origin/main..HEAD"

Step 3 - .gitleaks.toml config

Per gl-gh config structure:

[[rules]]
id = "rule-identifier"
description = "rule description"
regex = '''regex-pattern'''
secretGroup = 3
entropy = 3.5
keywords = ["auth", "password"]
tags = ["tag1", "tag2"]

[[rules.allowlists]]
description = "ignore specific matches"
commits = ["commit-hash"]
paths = ['''file-path-regex''']
stopwords = ['''false-positive-term''']

Built-in rules cover AWS, GCP, Azure, GitHub, GitLab, Stripe, Twilio, Slack, npm, PyPI, etc. Use gitleaks <command> --no-banner to discover the full default rule list.

Step 4 - Custom rule example

Org-internal secret formats (internal API-key prefixes, etc.) go in [[rules]] blocks. Set [extend] useDefault = true to keep the built-in rules; without it, custom rules replace the defaults entirely. Full example (custom rule + per-rule and top-level allowlists) in references/custom-rules-and-triage.md.

Step 5 - False-positive triage (MANDATORY)

Suppress genuine false-positives with [[rules.allowlists]] (paths / commits), the top-level [[allowlists]], --baseline-path for legacy debt, or an inline # gitleaks:allow comment. Every allowlist entry needs a Re-review-date; audit them quarterly. The suppression priority table and the justification template are in references/custom-rules-and-triage.md. Onboarding a repo that already has historical findings - baseline snapshots, cross-tool suppression consistency with TruffleHog, waiver pointers, and rot prevention - is in references/baseline.md.

Step 6 - Pre-commit hook integration

Per gl-gh:

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks
    rev: v8.24.2
    hooks:
      - id: gitleaks

Pre-commit prevents commits containing secrets from being created. Faster local feedback than CI-only scanning.

Step 7 - CI integration

Per gl-gh:

# .github/workflows/gitleaks.yml
name: gitleaks
on: [pull_request, push]
jobs:
  scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
        with: { fetch-depth: 0 }   # full history needed for git scan
      - uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
        env:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          GITLEAKS_LICENSE: ${{ secrets.GITLEAKS_LICENSE }}   # for organizations

fetch-depth: 0 is critical - without full git history, git-aware scan only sees the latest commit.

Step 8 - Rotation when a secret is found

Finding a leaked secret in git history is not enough - git history is permanent (mirrored in clones, GitHub forks, archives). The secret IS exposed. Workflow:

  1. Rotate immediately - invalidate the leaked credential at the provider (AWS IAM key rotation, GitHub PAT revoke, etc.)
  2. Audit usage - check provider audit logs for unauthorized use during the exposure window
  3. Document the incident - track in postmortem (cross-ref post-mortem-author in the qa-process plugin)
  4. Add the leaked-pattern to gitleaks so future similar leaks are detected
  5. Optional: rewrite git history (BFG Repo-Cleaner / git filter-repo) - but assume the secret IS exposed regardless

For automated rotation workflow, see secrets-rotation-runner.

Worked example

A team enables gitleaks on a 4-year-old private repo.

  1. First full-history scan writes 3 hits: gitleaks git --report-format json --report-path leaks.json.
  2. Two are real - an AWS access key in commit abc1234 and a Slack token in a since-deleted config. Both are rotated at the provider (Step 8), and provider audit logs are checked for misuse.
  3. One is a dummy AWS key under tests/fixtures/aws.json. It gets a [[rules.allowlists]] path entry with an Approved-by and a Re-review-date (references file).
  4. The rotated-but-still-in-history hits are captured as a baseline (gitleaks git --report-path gitleaks-baseline.json), and CI runs --baseline-path gitleaks-baseline.json so only NEW leaks fail.
  5. A pre-commit hook (Step 6) and a fetch-depth: 0 CI job (Step 7) are added. The next PR that pastes a live Stripe key is blocked at commit time and again in CI.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
fetch-depth: 1 in CIgit-aware scan misses history; only catches new leaksAlways fetch-depth: 0 (Step 7)
Allowlist without Re-review-datePermanent debtMandatory template (Step 5)
Rely only on pre-commit (no CI)Bypass --no-verify; CI is the catch-netBoth pre-commit AND CI (Steps 6 - 7)
Skip baseline; legacy findings block all PRsTeam disables gitleaks--baseline-path (Step 5)
Find leak; assume git-history scrub fixes itLeaked secret IS exposed; assume compromiseRotate immediately (Step 8)

Limitations

  • Regex + entropy can't catch all secret formats; pair with trufflehog-scanning (live-validation) for higher precision.
  • Rewriting git history is destructive + only effective if all copies are scrubbed (forks / clones / mirrors typically aren't).
  • Custom rules require regex skill; complex secret formats (multi-line, base64-encoded) need careful authoring.
  • gitleaks itself doesn't rotate secrets; that's the secrets-rotation-runner workflow.

References

  • gl-gh - repository, install, commands, config
  • gitleaks.io - landing page
  • Baseline management for legacy findings: references/baseline.md
  • trufflehog-scanning - sister scanner (live verification)
  • secrets-rotation-runner - build-an-X for rotation workflow after detection

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题