跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

grpc-mock

Wraps gRPC server-mocking patterns for client-side tests: Go bufconn (in-memory net.Listener via google.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn) + mockgen-generated interface mocks, Python pytest-grpc fixtures + unittest.mock patching of stubs, JVM grpc-mock library / in-process gRPC server (InProcessServerBuilder), Node @grpc/grpc-js fake server with NewServer-on-port-0. Also carries the interceptor-layer test patterns (Go / Java / grpc-js auth, retry, logging, error-mapping, chained ordering via a spy handler) in references/interceptors.md. Use when writing client-side tests that need a controllable gRPC server response (success cases, error cases, timeouts, single-response error injection) without spinning up a real backend, or when testing a gRPC interceptor. For multi-message streaming-sequence tests (server-streaming, bidi), use grpc-streaming-test-author instead. Distinct from grpcurl-cli (ad-hoc CLI invocation against a real server) and ghz-load (perf against a real server).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(6)

  • SKILL.md13.0 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json1.1 KB
  • references/go-interceptors.md8.3 KB
  • references/grpc-js-interceptors.md1.8 KB
  • references/interceptors.md9.1 KB
  • references/java-interceptors.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

grpc-mock

Overview

Mocking a gRPC server lets client-side tests exercise success paths, every grpc.StatusCode (per the status-code catalog in grpc-streaming-test-author, references/status-codes.md), timeouts, and streaming sequences without a real backend. The in-process harness is also the substrate for interceptor tests - see references/interceptors.md.

Three approaches dominate, picked by language:

ApproachMechanism
In-process gRPC serverA real grpc.Server listens on an in-memory transport (bufconn in Go, InProcessServerBuilder in JVM). Tests exercise the full client stack.
Interface mockmockgen / gomock (Go) / Mockito (JVM) / unittest.mock (Python) replace the generated client stub with a programmable mock. Faster but skips marshalling.
Standalone mock serverRun a tool like grpcmock / dishwasher as a subprocess. Cross-language client testing.

When to use

  • Client-side tests need controllable gRPC responses (success + error matrix).
  • Streaming-RPC tests need a server that sends a deterministic sequence.
  • Mid-test failure injection (deadline / cancellation / status code).
  • Tests must not depend on a running backend (offline CI).
  • Cross-service contract testing: want the client to see what the contract says, not what the current server happens to do.

Authoring

Go: bufconn + in-process server

Per pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn, bufconn.Listener is the canonical in-memory transport:

package myservice_test

import (
    "context"
    "net"
    "testing"

    "google.golang.org/grpc"
    "google.golang.org/grpc/codes"
    "google.golang.org/grpc/credentials/insecure"
    "google.golang.org/grpc/status"
    "google.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn"
    pb "example.com/proto"
)

const bufSize = 1024 * 1024

type fakeServer struct {
    pb.UnimplementedUserServiceServer
    nextResponse *pb.User
    nextErr      error
}

func (f *fakeServer) GetUser(ctx context.Context, req *pb.GetUserRequest) (*pb.User, error) {
    if f.nextErr != nil {
        return nil, f.nextErr
    }
    return f.nextResponse, nil
}

func setupClient(t *testing.T, fake *fakeServer) pb.UserServiceClient {
    lis := bufconn.Listen(bufSize)
    s := grpc.NewServer()
    pb.RegisterUserServiceServer(s, fake)
    go func() { _ = s.Serve(lis) }()
    t.Cleanup(func() { s.Stop() })

    conn, err := grpc.DialContext(context.Background(), "bufnet",
        grpc.WithContextDialer(func(context.Context, string) (net.Conn, error) {
            return lis.Dial()
        }),
        grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()),
    )
    if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }
    t.Cleanup(func() { conn.Close() })

    return pb.NewUserServiceClient(conn)
}

func TestGetUser_NotFound(t *testing.T) {
    fake := &fakeServer{
        nextErr: status.Error(codes.NotFound, "user does not exist"),
    }
    client := setupClient(t, fake)

    _, err := client.GetUser(context.Background(), &pb.GetUserRequest{Id: "missing"})

    st, _ := status.FromError(err)
    if st.Code() != codes.NotFound {
        t.Fatalf("got %v, want NotFound", st.Code())
    }
}

Per the status-code catalog in grpc-streaming-test-author (references/status-codes.md): assert on status.Code(), not on error message strings.

Go: gomock / mockgen (interface mock)

For tests that don't need the marshalling/transport stack:

go install go.uber.org/mock/mockgen@latest
mockgen -source=gen/user_grpc.pb.go -destination=mocks/user_mock.go
import (
    "testing"
    "go.uber.org/mock/gomock"
    pb "example.com/proto"
    mocks "example.com/mocks"
)

func TestServiceWithMockClient(t *testing.T) {
    ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
    mockClient := mocks.NewMockUserServiceClient(ctrl)

    mockClient.EXPECT().
        GetUser(gomock.Any(), gomock.Eq(&pb.GetUserRequest{Id: "u1"})).
        Return(&pb.User{Id: "u1", Name: "Alice"}, nil)

    // Test the code that uses mockClient ...
}

Tradeoff: doesn't exercise serialisation; faster, less fidelity.

Python: in-process server + pytest fixture

import grpc
import pytest
from concurrent import futures
from user_pb2 import User, GetUserRequest
from user_pb2_grpc import UserServiceServicer, add_UserServiceServicer_to_server, UserServiceStub


class FakeUserService(UserServiceServicer):
    next_response = None
    next_status = None

    def GetUser(self, request, context):
        if self.next_status is not None:
            context.abort(self.next_status, "fake error")
        return self.next_response


@pytest.fixture
def fake_service():
    return FakeUserService()


@pytest.fixture
def grpc_channel(fake_service):
    server = grpc.server(futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1))
    add_UserServiceServicer_to_server(fake_service, server)
    port = server.add_insecure_port("[::]:0")
    server.start()
    channel = grpc.insecure_channel(f"localhost:{port}")
    yield channel
    server.stop(grace=0)


def test_get_user_not_found(fake_service, grpc_channel):
    fake_service.next_status = grpc.StatusCode.NOT_FOUND
    stub = UserServiceStub(grpc_channel)
    with pytest.raises(grpc.RpcError) as exc:
        stub.GetUser(GetUserRequest(id="missing"))
    assert exc.value.code() == grpc.StatusCode.NOT_FOUND

server.add_insecure_port("[::]:0") lets the OS pick a free port - important for parallel test execution.

Python: unittest.mock patching of stub

from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock
import grpc

def test_service_with_mock_stub():
    with patch("myapp.user_pb2_grpc.UserServiceStub") as MockStub:
        instance = MockStub.return_value
        instance.GetUser.return_value = User(id="u1", name="Alice")

        # Test the code that uses UserServiceStub ...

JVM: InProcessServerBuilder

import io.grpc.inprocess.InProcessChannelBuilder;
import io.grpc.inprocess.InProcessServerBuilder;
import io.grpc.testing.GrpcCleanupRule;

@Rule public final GrpcCleanupRule grpcCleanup = new GrpcCleanupRule();

@Test
public void getUser_notFound() throws Exception {
    String serverName = InProcessServerBuilder.generateName();
    grpcCleanup.register(InProcessServerBuilder
        .forName(serverName)
        .directExecutor()
        .addService(new UserServiceGrpc.UserServiceImplBase() {
            @Override
            public void getUser(GetUserRequest req, StreamObserver<User> obs) {
                obs.onError(Status.NOT_FOUND
                    .withDescription("user does not exist")
                    .asRuntimeException());
            }
        })
        .build()
        .start());

    UserServiceGrpc.UserServiceBlockingStub stub = UserServiceGrpc.newBlockingStub(
        grpcCleanup.register(InProcessChannelBuilder
            .forName(serverName)
            .directExecutor()
            .build()));

    StatusRuntimeException e = assertThrows(StatusRuntimeException.class,
        () -> stub.getUser(GetUserRequest.newBuilder().setId("missing").build()));
    assertEquals(Status.Code.NOT_FOUND, e.getStatus().getCode());
}

Node / TypeScript: @grpc/grpc-js + port 0

import * as grpc from "@grpc/grpc-js";
import { UserServiceService } from "./generated/user_grpc_pb";

function createServer(handlers: Partial<UserServiceServer>) {
  const server = new grpc.Server();
  server.addService(UserServiceService, handlers);
  return new Promise<{ port: number; server: grpc.Server }>((resolve, reject) => {
    server.bindAsync("127.0.0.1:0", grpc.ServerCredentials.createInsecure(), (err, port) => {
      if (err) return reject(err);
      server.start();
      resolve({ port, server });
    });
  });
}

test("GetUser returns NOT_FOUND", async () => {
  const { port, server } = await createServer({
    getUser: (_call, callback) => {
      callback({ code: grpc.status.NOT_FOUND, details: "user does not exist" });
    },
  });
  const client = new UserServiceClient(`localhost:${port}`, grpc.credentials.createInsecure());
  await expect(() => promisify(client.getUser.bind(client))({ id: "missing" }))
    .rejects.toMatchObject({ code: grpc.status.NOT_FOUND });
  server.forceShutdown();
});

Running

These tests run as ordinary unit tests:

go test ./...                 # Go
pytest tests/                 # Python
mvn test                      # JVM
npm test                      # Node

Per-language test runners; no separate harness needed.

Parsing results

Test failures point to:

  • Wrong status code - fix server-side error mapping or test expectation per the status-code catalog in grpc-streaming-test-author (references/status-codes.md).
  • Marshalling errors - proto definition / generated code drift; regenerate via buf-cli-lint-breaking-build.
  • Timeout - server not responding; fake handler hung; check context.WithTimeout usage.

CI integration

jobs:
  unit-tests-with-grpc-mocks:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
      - run: go test ./... -race -timeout=60s

-race is critical for mock-server tests - concurrent client + server goroutines often surface races.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Asserting on error message stringsBrittle to i18n / wordingAssert on status.Code()
Hard-coded ports (8080) in testsPort conflicts in parallel CIUse bufconn (Go), [::]:0 (Python), InProcessChannel (JVM), port 0 (Node)
Sharing one mock server across testsTest order matters; flakyPer-test setup; t.Cleanup / fixture teardown
Mocking gRPC stub without server registrationTests skip codec, marshalling, error mappingIn-process server preferred over interface mock for service-level tests
Returning a Go error directly (not status.Error)Client sees Code: UnknownAlways wrap with status.Errorf(codes.X, "...")
Mocking streaming methods with one responseTests don't exercise multi-message logicUse a real stream + Send multiple times
Forgetting server.Stop() in teardownGoroutine leaks; future tests pollutet.Cleanup / pytest fixture yield
No -race flag in Go testsConcurrent races slip throughAlways go test -race in CI

Limitations

  • No wire-level fault injection in-process. For partial-byte cutoffs or middlebox-induced errors, use a real network + toxiproxy / tc.
  • bufconn / InProcessServer skip TLS. Tests that exercise TLS-specific code paths need a real server.
  • Streaming-test ergonomics differ per language. Bidi streaming with deterministic interleavings is fiddly everywhere; see grpc-streaming-test-author.
  • Mock-stub approach loses error-mapping fidelity. A real status.Errorf wraps differently than a hand-constructed Go error.
  • Doesn't replace contract tests. Mocks reflect what this test expects; they don't enforce that the real server actually produces those responses. Pair with protobuf-compat-checking (in the qa-contract-testing plugin).

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题