跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

helm-chart-tester

Configures helm-unittest for Helm chart unit testing - installs the `helm-unittest` plugin, authors `tests/*.yaml` per template, asserts on rendered manifests (`isKind`, `equal`, `matchRegex`, snapshots), plus `helm lint` and `helm template` render testing. Use to verify a chart's template logic and rendered shape; this is unit-level correctness testing, not security scanning - to enforce policy on rendered manifests use policy-as-code-runner, and to scan charts for misconfigurations use checkov-policy or trivy-config.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json658 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

helm-chart-tester

Overview

helm-unittest (Helm plugin) unit-tests the rendered chart output - assert specific fields, conditional behaviors, value substitutions - to catch template bugs before deploying.

When to use

  • Team ships Helm charts (in-house apps, OSS contributions).
  • A chart has conditional logic ({{ if .Values.foo }}); tests verify both branches.
  • A chart's rendered output must satisfy specific shape contracts (env vars, ports, labels).

Step 1 - Install

helm plugin install https://github.com/helm-unittest/helm-unittest
helm plugin list   # verify

Step 2 - Author a test

# charts/mychart/tests/deployment_test.yaml
suite: deployment template
templates:
  - templates/deployment.yaml
tests:
  - it: should set the right image
    set:
      image.repository: myapp
      image.tag: v1.2.3
    asserts:
      - isKind:
          of: Deployment
      - equal:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers[0].image
          value: myapp:v1.2.3

  - it: should add the configured env vars
    set:
      env:
        - name: API_URL
          value: https://api.example.com
        - name: LOG_LEVEL
          value: debug
    asserts:
      - contains:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers[0].env
          content:
            name: API_URL
            value: https://api.example.com

  - it: should add resource limits when set
    set:
      resources:
        limits:
          memory: 512Mi
          cpu: 500m
    asserts:
      - equal:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers[0].resources.limits.memory
          value: 512Mi

  - it: should NOT add resource limits when unset
    asserts:
      - notExists:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers[0].resources.limits

The set: block overrides values; asserts: checks the rendered output.

Step 3 - Common assertions

AssertionUse
equalExact value match
notEqualInverse
isKindDocument is the expected Kind
isAPIVersionSpecific API version
isNullOrEmptyField is null / empty
notNullOrEmptyField has a value
existsField exists
notExistsField absent
containsArray contains an item
notContainsInverse
matchRegexField matches regex
notMatchRegexInverse
failedTemplateTemplate should fail to render (negative test)

Step 4 - Run

# All tests for a chart
helm unittest charts/mychart/

# Specific test file
helm unittest charts/mychart/ -f tests/deployment_test.yaml

# Update snapshots (if using snapshot assertions)
helm unittest charts/mychart/ -u

Step 5 - Snapshot testing

For complex rendered manifests, snapshot the output:

tests:
  - it: should render the full deployment correctly
    asserts:
      - matchSnapshot: {}

First run captures the snapshot; subsequent runs compare. A diff fails the test. Useful for catching unintended template changes.

Per golden-file-conventions (in the qa-test-data plugin): sanitize the snapshots (strip volatile fields like timestamps).

Step 6 - Chart linting

helm lint charts/mychart/

Catches:

  • Missing required fields (name, version, appVersion).
  • Broken template syntax.
  • YAML formatting issues.
  • Schema violations (if values.schema.json present).

Run alongside unit tests in CI.

Step 7 - Render testing

# See the rendered output without applying
helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.test.yaml

# Compare two renders (e.g., before / after a change)
helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.test.yaml > new.yaml
git stash
helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.test.yaml > old.yaml
git stash pop
diff old.yaml new.yaml

Useful for review: "what does this change actually produce?"

Step 8 - CI integration

jobs:
  helm:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: azure/setup-helm@v4
        with: { version: 'v3.16.4' }
      - run: helm plugin install https://github.com/helm-unittest/helm-unittest
      - run: helm lint charts/mychart/
      - run: helm unittest charts/mychart/

Step 9 - Kubernetes admission integration

For deeper verification, render charts and run them through OPA / Conftest:

helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.yaml | conftest test -

The Conftest step catches policy violations the unit tests don't cover (e.g., "all containers must have resource limits"). See policy-as-code-runner.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skipping helm lintSchema violations slip; install fails at deploy.Always lint (Step 6).
Snapshot-only tests (no equal checks)Snapshots accept any change; explicit assertions catch intent.Mix snapshots + explicit (Step 2 + Step 5).
One mega-test file per chartTest file becomes unreadable; merge conflicts.One test file per template.
Hardcoded image tags in testsTests pass against the wrong tag if values default.Set image tag explicitly via set:.
Skipping the negative tests (notExists, failedTemplate)Unintended additions slip through.Test absences too (Step 2 example).

Limitations

  • Unit-level only. helm-unittest renders templates; doesn't install. For install verification, use Helm's helm install --dry-run + admission webhooks.
  • Snapshot maintenance. Snapshots accumulate; periodic review needed.
  • No cross-chart testing. Per-chart only; cross-chart interactions need integration testing.

References

  • helm-unittest at github.com/helm-unittest/helm-unittest.
  • Helm docs at helm.sh/docs/.
  • policy-as-code-runner - policy-level testing of rendered manifests.
  • golden-file-conventions - for snapshot sanitization patterns.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题