跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

jenkinsfile-test-stages

Configures Jenkins declarative pipeline test stages - `Jenkinsfile` with stages, parallel + per-agent execution, post-actions (always / failure / success), pipeline-junit-plugin for test reports, lockable resources for shared infra. Use for Jenkins-based CI (common in enterprise / regulated environments).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
集成工具GitLabDocker

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json446 B
  • references/environment-and-triggers.md1.6 KB
  • references/parallel-and-matrix.md1.7 KB
  • references/post-actions.md1.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

jenkinsfile-test-stages

Overview

Jenkins Declarative Pipeline (introduced 2017) is the modern Jenkinsfile syntax - replaces older Scripted Pipeline for most use cases.

A Jenkinsfile defines:

  • Pipeline - top-level container.
  • Agent - where stages run (any agent / specific node / Docker container).
  • Stages - sequential or parallel phases.
  • Steps - commands within a stage.
  • Post - actions after stages (always / success / failure / unstable / changed).

When to use

  • Enterprise / regulated environments using Jenkins.
  • Existing Jenkins infrastructure; migration to GitHub Actions / GitLab CI prohibitive.
  • Self-hosted CI / specialized hardware needs (GPU, specialized drivers).

For new projects in 2026+: GitHub Actions / GitLab CI offer better managed-runner experiences. Jenkins shines in self-hosted

  • plugin-rich environments.

How to use

  1. Add a Jenkinsfile with a pipeline { agent ...; stages { ... } } block; choose agent any, a labelled node, or a Docker image for reproducibility (Steps 1-2).
  2. Define stage('Build') / stage('Test') steps that run your install + test commands via sh.
  3. Parallelize independent suites and fan across an OS × runtime matrix - references/parallel-and-matrix.md.
  4. Add a post {} block to publish JUnit XML, archive artifacts, and notify per outcome - references/post-actions.md.
  5. Inject environment {} + masked withCredentials, serialize shared infra with lock(...), and set triggers / options - references/environment-and-triggers.md.
  6. Reach for retry(2) only on genuinely non-deterministic steps; prefer quarantine.
  7. Review the anti-patterns table before committing.

Step 1 - Basic Jenkinsfile

// Jenkinsfile
pipeline {
    agent any

    stages {
        stage('Build') {
            steps {
                sh 'npm ci'
            }
        }
        stage('Test') {
            steps {
                sh 'npm test'
            }
        }
    }
}

agent any runs on any available executor; pin via agent { label 'linux' } or agent { docker { image 'node:22' } }.

Step 2 - Docker agent

pipeline {
    agent {
        docker {
            image 'node:22'
            args '-v /tmp:/tmp'
        }
    }

    stages {
        stage('Test') {
            steps {
                sh 'npm ci && npm test'
            }
        }
    }
}

Docker agents provide reproducibility - same Node version on every run.

Advanced pipeline patterns

Deeper stage recipes are split into reference files:

When to retry

stage('Test') {
    steps {
        retry(2) {
            sh 'npm test'
        }
    }
}

Use sparingly - retries hide flake. Prefer flaky-test-quarantine (in the qa-flake-triage plugin).

Worked example

A regulated team runs its suite on a self-hosted Jenkins with a shared integration database.

  1. The Jenkinsfile pins agent { docker { image 'node:22' } } so every run uses the same runtime.
  2. A Tests stage runs Unit and Integration in parallel; the E2E branch overrides its agent to a mcr.microsoft.com/playwright:v1.50.0-noble image.
  3. The Integration step wraps its work in lock(resource: 'shared-test-database') so only one build touches the DB at a time.
  4. withCredentials([...]) injects the registry token, masked in logs; environment { CI = 'true' } marks the run as CI.
  5. post { always { junit 'reports/junit/*.xml'; archiveArtifacts 'coverage/**' } } publishes results either way, and failure { slackSend(...) } pings #ci on a red build.
  6. options { timeout(time: 30, unit: 'MINUTES') } kills hung builds so they don't hold executors.

Result: reproducible runs, no DB contention across parallel builds, and test reports plus notifications on every outcome.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Scripted pipeline for new codeDeclarative is the standard; better tooling support.Declarative Pipeline (Step 1).
Plaintext credentials in JenkinsfileSecret leak.withCredentials({...}) (environment-and-triggers).
No post { always {} } for artifact uploadFailure investigation incomplete.Always upload (post-actions).
Single-agent pipeline for parallel workNo parallelism; slow.Parallel stages (parallel-and-matrix).
Missing timeoutHung jobs consume executors indefinitely.options { timeout(...) } (environment-and-triggers).
Skipping agent { docker {...}}Inconsistent runtime per agent; hard to reproduce.Docker agents (Step 2).

Limitations

  • Plugin-heavy ecosystem. Updates can break things; pin versions.
  • Self-hosted infra cost. Manage Jenkins controller + agents.
  • Slower modernization. Jenkins evolves; modern features (matrix, declarative) require version bumps.
  • YAML / Groovy mix. Jenkinsfile is Groovy DSL; some teams prefer YAML.

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题