跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

kafka-consumer-tests

Tests Apache Kafka consumer and producer logic across KafkaJS (Node.js), kafka-go (Go), and Spring Kafka (Java) - spins up a real broker via the Testcontainers Kafka module, asserts offset management and consumer-group rebalance behavior, distinguishes at-least-once from exactly-once (EOS / transactions), validates idempotent producer configuration, and routes unprocessable messages to a dead-letter topic. Use when the user works with Kafka producers or consumers in any language and needs integration or unit tests that exercise delivery semantics, offset commits, rebalance handling, or dead-letter routing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md15.2 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json749 B
  • references/other-language-recipes.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

kafka-consumer-tests

Overview

Kafka uses consumer-owned committed offsets as its delivery primitive (unlike SQS visibility-timeout, RabbitMQ ack/nack, or BullMQ job-state) - every test must control where the read position is. This skill covers that model: offset management, consumer-group rebalance, at-least-once vs exactly-once (EOS / transactions), idempotent producer, and dead-letter routing across KafkaJS (Node.js), kafka-go (Go), and Spring Kafka (Java).

Step 1 - Spin up Kafka with Testcontainers

Per testcontainers.com/modules/kafka:

Node.js / TypeScript

npm install @testcontainers/kafka --save-dev
import { KafkaContainer } from '@testcontainers/kafka';

let container: Awaited<ReturnType<KafkaContainer['start']>>;

beforeAll(async () => {
  container = await new KafkaContainer('confluentinc/cp-kafka:7.2.2').start();
});

afterAll(async () => {
  await container.stop();
});

function brokers(): string[] {
  return [`${container.getHost()}:${container.getMappedPort(9093)}`];
}

Per node.testcontainers.org/modules/kafka, the mapped port is 9093; retrieve the host with container.getHost().

Java (Maven)

Per java.testcontainers.org/modules/kafka:

<dependency>
    <groupId>org.testcontainers</groupId>
    <artifactId>testcontainers-kafka</artifactId>
    <version>2.0.5</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
KafkaContainer kafka = new KafkaContainer("apache/kafka-native:3.8.0");
kafka.start();
String bootstrapServers = kafka.getBootstrapServers();

Go

import "github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/kafka"

kafkaContainer, err := kafka.Run(
    context.Background(),
    "confluentinc/confluent-local:7.5.0",
)

Python

from testcontainers.kafka import KafkaContainer

with KafkaContainer() as kafka:
    bootstrap_server = kafka.get_bootstrap_server()

Step 2 - Basic producer test (KafkaJS)

import { Kafka } from 'kafkajs';

it('produces a message to the topic', async () => {
  const kafka = new Kafka({ brokers: brokers() });
  const producer = kafka.producer();
  await producer.connect();

  const result = await producer.send({
    topic: 'orders',
    messages: [{ key: 'order-1', value: JSON.stringify({ amount: 42 }) }],
  });

  expect(result[0].errorCode).toBe(0);
  await producer.disconnect();
});

producer.send() returns partition metadata per kjs-gs; errorCode: 0 confirms the broker accepted the record.

Step 3 - Basic consumer test: offset management

Two commit strategies:

StrategyKafkaJS configRisk
Auto-commitautoCommit: true (default)offset committed before processing finishes - can skip on crash
Manual commitautoCommit: false + commitOffsetsIfNecessary()offset committed only after processing - at-least-once
it('consumes messages and commits offsets manually', async () => {
  const kafka = new Kafka({ brokers: brokers() });
  const received: string[] = [];

  const consumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'test-group-1' });
  await consumer.connect();
  await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'orders', fromBeginning: true });

  await consumer.run({
    autoCommit: false,
    eachBatch: async ({ batch, commitOffsetsIfNecessary, resolveOffset }) => {
      for (const msg of batch.messages) {
        received.push(msg.value!.toString());
        resolveOffset(msg.offset);          // mark processed
      }
      await commitOffsetsIfNecessary();     // commit atomically
    },
  });

  // wait for consumption then assert
  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1000));
  expect(received).toContain(JSON.stringify({ amount: 42 }));
  await consumer.disconnect();
});

fromBeginning: true sets auto.offset.reset to earliest per kjs-consuming: "starts from earliest [offset] when no committed offset exists."

Step 4 - Consumer-group rebalance

Per kafka.js.org/docs/consuming, the three timing parameters that govern rebalance are:

ParameterDefaultPurpose
sessionTimeout30 000 msfailure-detection window; broker removes member if no heartbeat within this window
rebalanceTimeout60 000 mstime allowed for members to rejoin after a rebalance is triggered
heartbeatInterval3 000 msfrequency of liveness pings to the broker

A rebalance test starts two consumers in the same group, sends messages, stops one consumer, then asserts the survivor processes all remaining messages:

it('surviving consumer processes all messages after rebalance', async () => {
  const kafka = new Kafka({ brokers: brokers() });
  const groupId = 'rebalance-test-group';

  const c1 = kafka.consumer({ groupId, sessionTimeout: 6000, heartbeatInterval: 1000 });
  const c2 = kafka.consumer({ groupId, sessionTimeout: 6000, heartbeatInterval: 1000 });
  const received: string[] = [];

  for (const c of [c1, c2]) {
    await c.connect();
    await c.subscribe({ topic: 'events', fromBeginning: true });
  }
  c2.run({ eachMessage: async ({ message }) => { received.push(message.value!.toString()); } });
  c1.run({ eachMessage: async ({ message }) => { received.push(message.value!.toString()); } });

  await c1.disconnect();   // trigger rebalance: c2 inherits all partitions

  // send more messages after rebalance
  const producer = kafka.producer();
  await producer.connect();
  await producer.send({ topic: 'events', messages: [{ value: 'post-rebalance' }] });
  await producer.disconnect();

  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 3000));
  expect(received).toContain('post-rebalance');
  await c2.disconnect();
});

Lowering sessionTimeout to 6 000 ms speeds up the rebalance in tests; production values are higher to avoid spurious rebalances.

Step 5 - At-least-once vs exactly-once (EOS / transactions)

At-least-once delivery is the default when autoCommit: false and the processor retries on failure - a crash before commitOffsetsIfNecessary() causes the broker to re-deliver the unacknowledged messages.

Exactly-once semantics (EOS) requires the transactional producer. Per kafka.js.org/docs/transactions:

const producer = kafka.producer({
  transactionalId: 'my-transactional-producer',
  maxInFlightRequests: 1,       // required for EOS
  idempotent: true,             // required for EOS
});
await producer.connect();

const tx = await producer.transaction();
try {
  await tx.send({ topic: 'output', messages: [{ value: 'result' }] });
  // atomically commit the consumer offset with the produced message
  await tx.sendOffsets({ consumerGroupId: 'test-group', topics: [...] });
  await tx.commit();
} catch (err) {
  await tx.abort();
  throw err;
}

Per kjs-tx: "The producer must have a max in flight requests of 1" and must use acks: -1 (all replicas). The transactionalId should encode topic and partition (e.g. 'myapp-producer-topic-0') so the broker can fence out duplicate instances.

A consumer must use readUncommitted: false (the default) to exclude in-flight transactional messages per kjs-consuming: "Set readUncommitted: false (default) to exclude uncommitted transactional messages from consumption."

EOS test pattern:

it('exactly-once: aborted transaction produces no visible messages', async () => {
  const producer = kafka.producer({
    transactionalId: 'eos-test',
    maxInFlightRequests: 1,
    idempotent: true,
  });
  await producer.connect();

  const tx = await producer.transaction();
  await tx.send({ topic: 'eos-topic', messages: [{ value: 'ghost' }] });
  await tx.abort();   // consumer should never see 'ghost'

  const consumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'eos-verify' });
  await consumer.connect();
  await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'eos-topic', fromBeginning: true });
  const received: string[] = [];
  consumer.run({ eachMessage: async ({ message }) => { received.push(message.value!.toString()); } });

  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1500));
  expect(received).not.toContain('ghost');

  await consumer.disconnect();
  await producer.disconnect();
});

Step 6 - Idempotent producer (standalone)

Per kafka.js.org/docs/transactions, idempotent: true can be set without a transactionalId. The broker deduplicates retried produce requests within the same producer session and sequence number:

const producer = kafka.producer({ idempotent: true });

This is sufficient to prevent duplicate records from network-level retries. It does not deduplicate across producer restarts - use the transactional API (Step 5) or application-level idempotency (see idempotency-test-author) for cross-restart deduplication.

Step 7 - Dead-letter topic (DLT)

KafkaJS provides no built-in DLT routing per the consuming documentation - the application must catch errors in eachMessage / eachBatch and produce to a <topic>.DLT topic manually:

const consumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'dlt-group' });
const dlqProducer = kafka.producer();
await consumer.connect();
await dlqProducer.connect();
await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'orders', fromBeginning: true });

consumer.run({
  eachMessage: async ({ topic, message }) => {
    try {
      await processOrder(JSON.parse(message.value!.toString()));
    } catch (err) {
      // route poison message to dead-letter topic
      await dlqProducer.send({
        topic: `${topic}.DLT`,
        messages: [{
          key: message.key,
          value: message.value,
          headers: { 'x-error': String(err) },
        }],
      });
    }
  },
});

Test the DLT route:

it('routes unprocessable message to DLT', async () => {
  // arrange: produce a poison message
  await producer.send({ topic: 'orders', messages: [{ value: 'NOT-JSON' }] });

  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1500));

  // assert: DLT received the record
  const dltConsumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'dlt-verifier' });
  await dltConsumer.connect();
  await dltConsumer.subscribe({ topic: 'orders.DLT', fromBeginning: true });
  const dltMessages: string[] = [];
  dltConsumer.run({ eachMessage: async ({ message }) => {
    dltMessages.push(message.value!.toString());
  }});
  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1500));
  expect(dltMessages).toContain('NOT-JSON');
  await dltConsumer.disconnect();
});

Spring Kafka provides @RetryableTopic for declarative DLT routing per docs.spring.io/spring-kafka/reference/testing.html.

Step 8 - Other languages

The KafkaJS recipes above are the core. Full Java (Spring Kafka + EmbeddedKafkaKraftBroker, KRaft since Kafka 4.0) and Go (kafka-go + Testcontainers; FetchMessage + CommitMessages for at-least-once) recipes are in references/other-language-recipes.md.

Step 9 - CI integration

Testcontainers pulls the broker image at runtime; no services: block is needed. Example for Node.js (GitHub Actions):

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npx jest --testPathPattern=kafka
        env:
          TESTCONTAINERS_RYUK_DISABLED: 'true'

For Java, replace the Node steps with actions/setup-java and mvn test. For Go, replace with actions/setup-go and go test.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Use ReadMessage (kafka-go) for at-least-once testsCommits before caller processes; at-most-once on crashUse FetchMessage + CommitMessages
Share groupId across parallel testsRebalance storms; flaky message allocationUse unique groupId per test (e.g. append uuid)
Skip await producer.disconnect() / r.Close()Goroutine / connection leaks; CI hangsClose in afterAll / defer
Assert message count with autoCommit: trueOffset committed before processing; race on crash pathUse autoCommit: false + manual commit for assertion tests
Test EOS with readUncommitted: trueConsumer sees aborted messages; false-passing testKeep readUncommitted: false (default)
Use sessionTimeout > rebalanceTimeoutRebalance never completesEnsure sessionTimeout < rebalanceTimeout

Limitations

  • Testcontainers Kafka image pull adds 30-60 s on a cold CI runner; cache the Docker layer to mitigate.
  • kafka-go does not expose a transactional producer API per kgo; EOS tests in Go require the confluent-kafka-go library or a higher-level framework.
  • Spring Kafka's EmbeddedKafkaKraftBroker (Kafka 4.0+) does not support the old ZooKeeper-based configuration; update spring-kafka-test to 4.x if migrating from older Spring Boot.
  • Consumer-group rebalance test timing is environment-dependent; lower sessionTimeout in tests (e.g. 6 000 ms) rather than relying on wall-clock sleep durations.

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题