跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

living-documentation-publisher

Converts passing Cucumber JSON output into stakeholder-facing living documentation: generates HTML reports via multiple-cucumber-html-reporter (Node) or Serenity BDD aggregate (JVM), applies Gherkin tags to drive report sections, and publishes to GitHub/GitLab Pages in CI. Use when BDD scenarios are in use and the team needs an always-current, non-test-engineer-readable document showing which acceptance criteria pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
集成工具GitHubGitLab

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json567 B
  • references/ci-publish.md1.3 KB
  • references/node-reporter.md3.1 KB
  • references/serenity-reporter.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

living-documentation-publisher

Overview

Per the Serenity BDD book (serenity-bdd/the-serenity-book, living-documentation.adoc):

"Living documentation is generated by the automated test suite, and is therefore by definition it is always up-to-date."

The same source distinguishes living documentation from plain test reports: living documentation is authored before development starts, targets the whole team (BAs, product owners, stakeholders), and reads as a business-functionality narrative, not a pass/fail table.

This skill covers the full workflow: produce Cucumber JSON from a passing suite, feed it into a report renderer, apply tag-based section routing, and publish the HTML artefact to a Pages endpoint so stakeholders get a URL, not a zip file.

Two primary renderers are covered:

When to use

  • The team already has Cucumber scenarios (see cucumber-testing) and stakeholders need to read acceptance-criteria status without opening a test runner.
  • The living-documentation page must track only passing scenarios (not every scenario authored, including pending or skipped ones).
  • CI should gate report publication so stakeholders never see a stale or red-run document.

If only engineers read the results, the JUnit XML feed to junit-xml-analysis (in the qa-test-reporting plugin) is sufficient.

How to use

  1. Produce Cucumber JSON from a passing suite - add a json: formatter (Cucumber-JS) or let CucumberWithSerenity capture results (JVM). Step 1.
  2. Exclude @wip / @pending scenarios so the document shows only accepted behaviour. Step 4.
  3. Render the JSON to HTML - Node path via references/node-reporter.md, JVM path via references/serenity-reporter.md. Steps 2-3.
  4. Tag scenarios by capability and sprint so stakeholders can navigate report sections. Step 4.
  5. Gate publication on a green exit code so no red or stale run ships. Step 5.
  6. Publish the HTML to GitHub/GitLab Pages in CI so stakeholders get a URL. Step 6, via references/ci-publish.md.

Worked example

A Cucumber-JS "Checkout Service" suite has 24 scenarios tagged by capability (@billing, @cart) and sprint (@sprint-12); 2 are still @wip.

  1. CI runs npx cucumber-js features/ --tags "not @wip" --format json:reports/cucumber.json, producing JSON for the 22 passing scenarios.
  2. node scripts/generate-report.js renders ./docs/living-documentation/ under the report name "Checkout Service - Living Documentation".
  3. Because set -e precedes the generate step, a red run aborts before publishing.
  4. peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v4 pushes the folder to GitHub Pages.
  5. Result: the product owner opens the Pages URL and sees 22 green acceptance criteria grouped under Billing and Cart, with the two @wip scenarios absent - an always-current, business-readable status page.

Step 1 - Produce Cucumber JSON output

The report renderers both consume Cucumber JSON. Configure the JSON formatter before wiring the renderer.

Cucumber-JS (in package.json):

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "cucumber-js features/ --format json:reports/cucumber.json"
  }
}

For parallel shards, use a timestamped JSON filename to avoid overwrite - see references/node-reporter.md.

Cucumber-JVM with Serenity (in serenity.properties):

The CucumberWithSerenity runner captures results automatically; no explicit JSON formatter is needed. Serenity writes its own JSON artefacts to target/site/serenity/ as part of mvn verify (serenity-bdd/the-serenity-book, maven.adoc).

Step 2 - Generate the HTML report (Node path)

For any Cucumber-JS project, render the JSON with multiple-cucumber-html-reporter: install it, add a scripts/generate-report.js that points jsonDir at ./reports/ and reportPath at ./docs/living-documentation/, then run npm test && node scripts/generate-report.js. Full install, script, and options table: references/node-reporter.md.

Step 3 - Generate the HTML report (JVM / Serenity path)

For Maven/Gradle projects running CucumberWithSerenity, bind the serenity-maven-plugin aggregate goal to post-integration-test and run mvn verify. The Requirements tab renders living documentation from the feature-directory hierarchy. Full plugin config, hierarchy labels, and readme.md enrichment: references/serenity-reporter.md.

Step 4 - Tag scenarios for report sections

Use Gherkin tags to categorise scenarios in both renderers.

In the feature file:

@billing @sprint-12
Scenario: Apply promo at checkout
  Given ...

Serenity tag filtering - run only tagged tests and limit the aggregate report to those requirements (serenity-bdd/the-serenity-book, filtering-reports.adoc):

# Run and report on one sprint
mvn clean verify -Dcucumber.options="--tags=@sprint-12" \
  -Dtags=sprint-12

# Post-run report filtered to a tag
mvn serenity:aggregate -Dtags=sprint-12

Note: "requirements filtering only happens if you specify the tags option" (serenity-bdd/the-serenity-book, filtering-reports.adoc).

Excluding pending/WIP from published docs:

# Cucumber-JS: exclude anything tagged @wip from the JSON
npx cucumber-js features/ \
  --tags "not @wip" \
  --format json:reports/cucumber.json

This keeps the living-documentation page free of scenarios that are not yet passing.

Step 5 - Only publish passing runs

Gate the report publication step on a green test exit code. In a shell script:

set -e
npm test                         # exits non-zero on any failure
node scripts/generate-report.js  # only reached if all tests pass

For Serenity, use serenity:check after verify (serenity-bdd/the-serenity-book, maven.adoc):

mvn verify serenity:check        # fails the build if any scenario is red

This ensures the published artefact reflects only a fully-green run.

Step 6 - Publish to GitHub Pages (CI)

Publish the generated HTML to GitHub or GitLab Pages so stakeholders get a URL, not a zip file. Full GitHub Actions and GitLab Pages jobs (including the Serenity publish_dir override): references/ci-publish.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Publishing on any push, including red runsStakeholders see failing-scenario counts; erodes trust in the documentGate publish on exit code 0 (Step 5)
Including @wip / @pending scenarios in the reportDocument shows work-in-progress as if it is accepted behaviourFilter with not @wip before generating JSON
One flat tag for all scenariosStakeholders cannot navigate to a capability areaApply two-level tags: @capability-name and @sprint-N
Publishing stale JSON from a previous runReport shows old results after source changesDelete reports/*.json at the start of each CI run before running tests
Embedding full screenshots in every stepHTML artefact becomes hundreds of MBUse Serenity's evidence API (Serenity.recordReportData()) selectively, or configure take.screenshots=FOR_FAILURES in serenity.properties

Limitations

  • Serenity aggregate requires JVM test execution in the same Maven lifecycle. Running serenity:aggregate against JSON files from a Cucumber-JS run is not supported; use multiple-cucumber-html-reporter for Node projects.
  • multiple-cucumber-html-reporter merges JSON by filename, not by run order. If parallel shards write JSON with identical names, results are silently overwritten. Use timestamped or shard-indexed filenames.
  • Pages publish latency. GitHub Pages can take 60-120 seconds to reflect a push; stakeholders may see the previous version briefly after a CI run.
  • Serenity requirements hierarchy is derived from directory layout. Renaming a feature directory breaks historical trend data in the report.

References

  • ld - Serenity BDD book, living-documentation.adoc: definition, Requirements tab, hierarchy, readme.md enrichment, evidence API.
  • mv - Serenity BDD book, maven.adoc: serenity-maven-plugin coordinates, aggregate goal, post-integration-test phase binding, mvn verify, serenity:check.
  • fr - Serenity BDD book, filtering-reports.adoc: -Dtags, -Dcucumber.options, requirements-filtering caveat.
  • references/node-reporter.md - Node renderer install, generate-report.js, and the full options table.
  • references/serenity-reporter.md - Serenity Maven plugin, aggregate goal, requirements hierarchy, readme.md enrichment.
  • references/ci-publish.md - GitHub Actions and GitLab Pages publish jobs.
  • cucumber-testing - upstream skill: produce Cucumber JSON with --format json:.
  • junit-xml-analysis (in the qa-test-reporting plugin) - engineer-facing test result analysis (separate concern from stakeholder docs).
  • github-actions-test-jobs (in the qa-ci-integration plugin) - CI job conventions for the publish step.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题