跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

opentelemetry-trace-assertions

Author trace-shape assertions in tests using OpenTelemetry SDK in-memory exporter - capture spans during test execution, assert on span name + attributes + status + parent-child structure + duration. Cross-language patterns (Python `InMemorySpanExporter` + `SimpleSpanProcessor`, JS `getRecordedSpans()`, Java `OpenTelemetryExtension`); CI integration. Use when a service is instrumented with the OpenTelemetry SDK and downstream alerts, SLOs, or dashboards depend on specific span names or attributes that a refactor could silently drop.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(12)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json685 B
  • evals/availability-panel-flat-at-100-through-an-outage/criteria.json6.1 KB
  • evals/availability-panel-flat-at-100-through-an-outage/task.md14.4 KB
  • evals/card-outage-that-paged-nobody/criteria.json5.8 KB
  • evals/card-outage-that-paged-nobody/task.md14.6 KB
  • evals/db-panel-empty-for-a-month-while-tests-stay-green/criteria.json5.5 KB
  • evals/db-panel-empty-for-a-month-while-tests-stay-green/task.md12.7 KB
  • evals/three-acceptance-criteria-one-repo/criteria.json5.1 KB
  • evals/three-acceptance-criteria-one-repo/task.md14.2 KB
  • evals/trace-job-eats-more-wall-clock-than-the-rest-of-ci/criteria.json5.6 KB
  • evals/trace-job-eats-more-wall-clock-than-the-rest-of-ci/task.md13.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

opentelemetry-trace-assertions

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, a trace is "the path of a request through your application" and a span is "a unit of work or operation". Spans form a directed acyclic graph (DAG) via parent-child relationships, all sharing the same trace_id.

When to use

  • Service is instrumented with OpenTelemetry SDK and the team's observability stack (alerts, SLOs) depends on specific span attributes - silent removal of an attribute breaks downstream alerting.
  • Trace-shape changes have caused production incidents.
  • Onboarding new instrumentation needs a regression baseline.

Step 1 - Install (per language)

LanguageInstall
Pythonpip install opentelemetry-sdk
JS/TSnpm install @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node
Java (Maven)<dependency><groupId>io.opentelemetry</groupId><artifactId>opentelemetry-sdk-testing</artifactId></dependency>
.NETdotnet add package OpenTelemetry --prerelease + OpenTelemetry.Exporter.InMemory

Step 2 - In-memory exporter setup (Python)

Per the Python SDK trace docs, use SimpleSpanProcessor for tests because it "passes ended spans directly to the configured SpanExporter" synchronously - no batching, no flush wait:

from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export.in_memory_span_exporter import InMemorySpanExporter
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import SimpleSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry import trace

memory_exporter = InMemorySpanExporter()
tracer_provider = TracerProvider()
tracer_provider.add_span_processor(SimpleSpanProcessor(memory_exporter))
trace.set_tracer_provider(tracer_provider)

# ... exercise code under test ...

spans = memory_exporter.get_finished_spans()
assert len(spans) == 3
memory_exporter.clear()

The clear() call between tests prevents cross-test span leakage.

Step 3 - Span shape assertions

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, spans expose name, attributes, status, and kind:

def test_order_creation_emits_correct_trace():
    with use_tracer():
        create_order(items=[item])

    spans = memory_exporter.get_finished_spans()
    span_by_name = {s.name: s for s in spans}

    assert "order.create" in span_by_name
    order_span = span_by_name["order.create"]
    assert order_span.attributes.get("order.item_count") == 1
    assert order_span.status.status_code == StatusCode.OK
    assert order_span.kind == SpanKind.INTERNAL

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs: span kind values are INTERNAL (in-process), CLIENT (outgoing remote), SERVER (incoming remote), PRODUCER (queue publish), CONSUMER (queue process).

Step 4 - Parent-child structure

Per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs, spans share a trace_id and reference their parent via parent_id. Assert structure (not values - IDs are random per run):

db_span = span_by_name["db.query"]
order_span = span_by_name["order.create"]

# Same trace
assert db_span.context.trace_id == order_span.context.trace_id

# DB is a child of order.create
assert db_span.parent.span_id == order_span.context.span_id

Step 5 - Semantic conventions verification

Per the HTTP semantic conventions docs, required HTTP client span attributes include http.request.method, url.full, server.address, server.port, http.response.status_code, and error.type:

assert http_span.attributes["http.request.method"] == "POST"
assert http_span.attributes["url.full"].startswith("https://api.example.com/orders")
assert http_span.attributes["http.response.status_code"] == 201

Deprecation note: older SDKs emitted http.method (deprecated). Per the HTTP semantic conventions docs, the current key is http.request.method. The OTEL_SEMCONV_STABILITY_OPT_IN env var controls dual-emit during migration. Tests should assert the new keys; failures during SDK upgrade are the signal that instrumentation needs migrating, not that the test is wrong.

Step 6 - JS / TS pattern

import { InMemorySpanExporter, SimpleSpanProcessor } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base';
import { NodeTracerProvider } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node';

const memoryExporter = new InMemorySpanExporter();
const provider = new NodeTracerProvider();
provider.addSpanProcessor(new SimpleSpanProcessor(memoryExporter));
provider.register();

// ... exercise ...

const spans = memoryExporter.getFinishedSpans();
expect(spans).toHaveLength(3);
memoryExporter.reset();

Step 7 - Java JUnit 5 pattern

@RegisterExtension
static final OpenTelemetryExtension otelTesting = OpenTelemetryExtension.create();

@Test
void orderCreateEmitsTrace() {
    createOrder(/* ... */);

    List<SpanData> spans = otelTesting.getSpans();
    assertThat(spans).extracting(SpanData::getName).contains("order.create");
}

OpenTelemetryExtension (from opentelemetry-sdk-testing) auto-resets between tests; no manual clear() needed.

Step 8 - CI integration

Pin the SDK version in test deps. SDK upgrades change attribute keys (see Step 5 deprecation note); pinning prevents trace assertions from silently changing meaning between releases.

# pytest in CI
- run: |
    pip install opentelemetry-sdk==1.29.0
    pytest tests/trace/ -v

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Asserting on exact span IDsIDs are random per runAssert structure (parent.span_id == X.context.span_id), not values (Step 4)
Asserting span count without name lookupBrittle to instrumentation reorderBuild span_by_name dict (Step 3)
Use BatchSpanProcessor for testsAsync batching → flaky get_finished_spans()Always SimpleSpanProcessor for tests (Step 2)
Skip memory_exporter.clear() between testsCross-test span leakage; flakeclear() in fixture teardown (Step 2)
Assert on legacy http.method keysBreaks on SDK upgrade to v1.20+Use http.request.method (Step 5)

Limitations

  • In-memory exporter doesn't catch async-boundary issues across process boundaries - pair with jaeger-trace-tests (Jaeger, Zipkin, or Tempo backends) for end-to-end trace verification.
  • SDK-version drift can change span attribute names; pin SDK version in CI (Step 8).
  • Span links (per the OpenTelemetry traces concept docs) are not asserted in this skill's pattern; extend per use case.

References

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题