跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

protobuf-compat-checking

Wraps `buf breaking` to compare a Protobuf schema against a past version, classifies breaking changes by category (FILE / PACKAGE / WIRE_JSON / WIRE), configures buf.yaml rule selection plus per-path exemptions, and gates CI on the exit code. Use when reviewing `.proto` changes in a PR for gRPC services, BSR modules, or schema-versioned message bus payloads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json500 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

protobuf-compat-checking

Overview

buf breaking is the canonical Protobuf compatibility checker from the Buf project (buf-breaking). It compares the current schema against a past version (BSR module, Git ref, tarball, or buf image) and reports changes that would break clients, servers, or generated code.

This is the Protobuf-specific counterpart to openapi-contract-diff (REST) and graphql-schema-regression (GraphQL).

When to use

  • The repo has .proto files (gRPC service definitions, message-bus schemas, internal data contracts).
  • The team uses Buf Schema Registry (BSR) or git-versioned Protobuf modules.
  • A CI gate is needed on schema regressions before pushing a new version of generated client / server code.
  • The team needs per-category strictness - e.g. FILE-level checks during early development, downgrade to WIRE for stable v1+ APIs where source-level changes are acceptable but wire-format breakage is not.

Breaking categories

buf breaking rules ship in four nested categories - stricter subsumes looser (buf-breaking):

CategoryDetects
FILESource-code breakage per-file. Default; strictest.
PACKAGESource-code breakage per-package.
WIRE_JSONWire-format or JSON-encoding breakage.
WIREWire-format breakage only. Loosest.

Choose FILE for new internal services where source compatibility matters; choose WIRE_JSON for stable APIs where source rearrangement (e.g. moving a message between files) is acceptable but JSON-mapping breakage is not; choose WIRE only when JSON encoding is out-of-scope.

Configuration

buf.yaml v2 form (buf-yaml):

version: v2
modules:
  - path: proto
    name: buf.build/acme/foo
breaking:
  use:
    - FILE
  except:
    - FILE_NO_DELETE          # allow file deletions despite using FILE
  ignore:
    - foo/legacy/             # exclude entire path from all breaking rules
  ignore_only:
    FILE_NO_DELETE:
      - foo/bar.proto         # exclude specific path from a specific rule
  ignore_unstable_packages: true   # ignore v1alpha1 / v1beta1 / *test* packages

version: v2 is required for the structure above; legacy v1 and v1beta1 files use a different shape (buf-yaml). When migrating, run buf migrate v1tov2 to convert.

ignore_unstable_packages: true is the canonical pattern - Protobuf convention is that v1alpha1, v1beta1, and *test* packages are unstable and explicitly NOT covered by compatibility guarantees.

Running

Against a Git reference

buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
buf breaking --against '.git#tag=v1.2.0'
buf breaking --against '.git#ref=HEAD~1'

(Per buf-breaking.)

The .git#... syntax tells buf to checkout the referenced ref into a temp directory and use it as the baseline. This is the most common CI pattern: compare PR against main.

Against a BSR module

buf breaking --against buf.build/acme/foo
buf breaking --against buf.build/acme/foo:<commit-sha>

Use the BSR baseline when the team treats BSR as the source of truth and a release labeled v1 is what production is consuming.

Against a tarball or buf image

buf breaking --against archive.tar.gz
buf breaking --against image.bin       # buf-image-format binary

Useful for hermetic builds where the baseline is published as an artifact rather than a git ref.

Reading the report

buf breaking exits non-zero on detected breaking changes. The default output prints one line per finding with the offending file, line, column, rule ID, and message:

proto/orders/v1/order.proto:42:3:Field "1" with name "amount" on message
"Order" has the same number as deleted field with name "total".
[ENUM_VALUE_NO_DELETE_RESERVED]

For machine consumption, supply --error-format json:

buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main' --error-format json
{
  "path": "proto/orders/v1/order.proto",
  "start_line": 42,
  "start_column": 3,
  "type": "ENUM_VALUE_NO_DELETE_RESERVED",
  "message": "Field 1 ..."
}

Pipe to jq for triage:

buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main' --error-format json | \
  jq -r '"\(.type) \(.path):\(.start_line) - \(.message)"'

CI integration

GitHub Actions

The Buf project ships an official Action (bufbuild/buf-action) that runs lint + breaking + push against BSR in one job. For self-hosted breaking-only:

# .github/workflows/buf-breaking.yml
name: buf-breaking

on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - '**/*.proto'
      - 'buf.yaml'
      - 'buf.lock'

jobs:
  breaking:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0   # need history for `.git#branch=main` baseline

      - uses: bufbuild/buf-setup-action@v1

      - name: buf breaking
        run: buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main,subdir=.'

fetch-depth: 0 is required so the .git#branch=main ref resolves - the default shallow clone doesn't have it.

For stricter pipelines, also gate on buf lint:

- name: buf lint
  run: buf lint
- name: buf breaking
  run: buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main,subdir=.'

Tag-based releases

For projects using git tags as release boundaries:

# Compare PR vs the latest released tag
LATEST_TAG=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)
buf breaking --against ".git#tag=${LATEST_TAG}"

This catches breaking changes vs production, not just vs the trunk HEAD - useful when main itself contains in-progress un-released work.

References

  • buf-breaking - buf breaking semantics, categories, baseline reference formats.
  • buf-yaml - v2 buf.yaml configuration; breaking.use, except, ignore, ignore_only, ignore_unstable_packages.
  • openapi-contract-diff - REST counterpart.
  • graphql-schema-regression - GraphQL counterpart.
  • contract-compatibility-gate - gate skill aggregating breaking-change verdicts across protocols.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题