跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

rabbitmq-tests

Tests RabbitMQ producer/consumer interactions - supports AMQP 0.9.1 and AMQP 1.0 protocols across 6 tutorial patterns (Hello World, Work Queues, Publish/Subscribe, Routing, Topics, RPC) plus Publisher Confirms; consumer ack/nack/requeue patterns; durable queues + persistent messages; quorum vs classic queue; tests via Testcontainers RabbitMQ image or LocalStack-equivalent. Use when the user works with RabbitMQ producers/consumers (pika, amqplib, RabbitMQ.Client, spring-amqp) and needs unit/integration tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa星标 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
集成工具Docker

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json643 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

rabbitmq-tests

Overview

RabbitMQ is the leading OSS AMQP message broker. Per rabbitmq.com/tutorials, the canonical learning path is six tutorials covering progressively more sophisticated patterns:

TutorialPattern
Hello World!Single producer → single consumer
Work QueuesProducer → multiple competing consumers (round-robin)
Publish/SubscribeFanout exchange → multiple consumers (broadcast)
RoutingDirect exchange with routing keys
TopicsTopic exchange with wildcard routing patterns
RPCRequest-reply via reply-to + correlation-id

All six tutorials exist in both AMQP 0.9.1 and AMQP 1.0 variants per rmq-tut; AMQP 0.9.1 also has a 7th tutorial - Publisher Confirms - for delivery guarantees.

Per rmq-tut: "Executable versions of these tutorials are open source."

When to use

  • The repo has RabbitMQ producer / consumer code (pika in Python, amqplib in Node.js, RabbitMQ.Client in .NET, spring-amqp in Java).
  • The user writes unit tests for the producer/consumer logic.
  • The user writes integration tests against a real RabbitMQ broker (Docker / Testcontainers).
  • A test verifies ack semantics, retry-via-requeue, dead-letter exchanges, or publisher confirms.

Step 1 - Test approach

Three approaches:

ApproachProsCons
Mock the AMQP client (pika.BlockingConnection, amqplib Channel)Fast, no broker depDoesn't catch protocol-level behavior (ack races, requeue ordering)
Testcontainers RabbitMQ (Docker image per test class)Full AMQP semantics, isolatedSlower; container startup cost
Shared dev RabbitMQ instanceFastTest interference; queue cleanup discipline required

Pick Testcontainers for integration tests; mocking for pure producer-logic unit tests.

Step 2 - Testcontainers setup (Python)

from testcontainers.rabbitmq import RabbitMqContainer
import pika

@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def rabbitmq():
    with RabbitMqContainer("rabbitmq:3-management") as rmq:
        yield rmq

@pytest.fixture
def channel(rabbitmq):
    conn = pika.BlockingConnection(pika.URLParameters(rabbitmq.get_connection_url()))
    ch = conn.channel()
    yield ch
    conn.close()

(Testcontainers cleans up the container automatically when the fixture scope ends.)

Step 3 - Hello World pattern (basic publish + consume)

Producer side:

def publish_order(channel, order_data):
    channel.queue_declare(queue='orders', durable=True)
    channel.basic_publish(
        exchange='',
        routing_key='orders',
        body=json.dumps(order_data),
        properties=pika.BasicProperties(delivery_mode=2),  # persistent
    )

Test:

def test_publish_order(channel):
    publish_order(channel, {"id": 1})

    method, props, body = channel.basic_get(queue='orders', auto_ack=True)
    assert method is not None
    assert json.loads(body) == {"id": 1}

Step 4 - Test consumer ack / nack / requeue

def consume_order(channel):
    method, props, body = channel.basic_get(queue='orders')
    if method is None:
        return None
    try:
        process(body)
        channel.basic_ack(method.delivery_tag)
        return body
    except TransientError:
        channel.basic_nack(method.delivery_tag, requeue=True)   # requeue for retry
        raise
    except PermanentError:
        channel.basic_nack(method.delivery_tag, requeue=False)  # to DLX if configured
        raise

Test the requeue path:

def test_consumer_requeues_on_transient_error(channel, mocker):
    channel.queue_declare(queue='orders', durable=True)
    channel.basic_publish(exchange='', routing_key='orders', body='msg-1')

    mocker.patch('proj.consumer.process', side_effect=TransientError)
    with pytest.raises(TransientError):
        consume_order(channel)

    # Message should be back in the queue:
    method, _, body = channel.basic_get(queue='orders', auto_ack=True)
    assert body == b'msg-1'

Step 5 - Test dead-letter exchange (DLX)

channel.exchange_declare(exchange='dlx', exchange_type='direct', durable=True)
channel.queue_declare(queue='orders-dlq', durable=True)
channel.queue_bind(queue='orders-dlq', exchange='dlx', routing_key='orders')

channel.queue_declare(
    queue='orders',
    durable=True,
    arguments={
        'x-dead-letter-exchange': 'dlx',
        'x-dead-letter-routing-key': 'orders',
    },
)

After basic_nack(requeue=False) or message TTL expiry, the message routes to orders-dlq. Test by consuming from the DLQ.

Step 6 - Publisher Confirms

Per the AMQP 0.9.1 Publisher Confirms tutorial (per rmq-tut):

channel.confirm_delivery()
try:
    channel.basic_publish(
        exchange='',
        routing_key='orders',
        body='order-1',
        mandatory=True,
        properties=pika.BasicProperties(delivery_mode=2),
    )
    # If the broker can't route or persist, raises pika.exceptions.UnroutableError
    # or NackError. Otherwise the message was confirmed.
except pika.exceptions.UnroutableError:
    raise

For tests asserting publisher confirms succeed, simply enable confirm mode and assert no exception.

Step 7 - Quorum queue testing

Quorum queues (since RabbitMQ 3.8) replace mirrored classic queues for HA. Test pattern is identical to classic queues at the API level; the difference is in arguments:

channel.queue_declare(
    queue='orders',
    durable=True,
    arguments={'x-queue-type': 'quorum'},
)

Quorum-specific testing (e.g., partition-tolerance) requires multi-node clusters - Jepsen-style; out of scope for typical integration tests.

Step 8 - CI integration

services:
  rabbitmq:
    image: rabbitmq:3-management
    ports: [5672:5672, 15672:15672]
    options: >-
      --health-cmd "rabbitmq-diagnostics ping"
      --health-interval 10s
      --health-timeout 5s
      --health-retries 5

steps:
  - run: pytest tests/integration/amqp/ -v

The :management tag includes the management UI on port 15672 for debugging in CI logs.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Use auto_ack=True for tests of error pathsMessage ack-ed before processing → no requeue test possibleauto_ack=False (Step 4)
Test publisher without confirm_delivery()Can't assert delivery happened - broker may have dropped the messageEnable confirm mode (Step 6)
Skip queue cleanup between testsStale messages cause flaky assertionsqueue_purge or per-test queue names
Use durable=False on production-mirrored queues in testsTests pass; production loses messages on broker restartMatch production queue config in tests

Limitations

  • AMQP 0.9.1 vs AMQP 1.0 protocol differences - pick one per service; tutorials cover both per rmq-tut.
  • Multi-node cluster behavior (network partitions, leader election) is out of scope for typical integration tests; use Jepsen for those.
  • Stream queues (added 2021) have a different API; not covered here.
  • pika is the canonical Python client; for asyncio, prefer aio-pika.

References

  • rmq-tut - six canonical tutorials (Hello World, Work Queues, Publish/Subscribe, Routing, Topics, RPC) + Publisher Confirms; covers AMQP 0.9.1 and AMQP 1.0
  • github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-tutorials - executable versions of the tutorials
  • rabbitmq.com/docs - full RabbitMQ documentation
  • testcontainers.com/modules/rabbitmq - Testcontainers RabbitMQ module
  • sidekiq-tests, celery-tests, bullmq-tests, sqs-tests - sister tools (Celery often runs on RabbitMQ; the celery-tests skill complements this for Python-Celery deployments)
  • idempotency-test-author - critical companion: requeue + redelivery semantics need idempotent consumers

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

查看 testland 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题