跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

code-change-safety-checkpoint

Preserve rollback before materially risky edits.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml249 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Code Change Safety Checkpoint

Use this skill before risky edits. The goal is simple: make sure there is a credible way back before changing files.

Trigger

Use when:

  • the user asks for website, app, repo, or code changes with nontrivial blast radius
  • files may be deleted, moved, regenerated, overwritten, or mass-edited
  • the repo has uncommitted changes
  • the work touches shared behavior, routing, deployment config, generated assets, or build tooling
  • the user specifically asks for backup, checkpoint, rollback protection, or protection from accidental destructive changes

Do not run heavy backup steps for tiny read-only analysis or single-line edits unless the user asks.

Workflow

  1. Inspect state before editing.

    • Run git status --short --branch when inside a git repo.
    • Identify changed files that already exist before your work.
    • Treat uncommitted user changes as protected.
  2. Choose the rollback path.

    • Follow the current repository/worktree branch policy. Record a recoverable base commit for tracked data; a branch label alone does not preserve uncommitted or untracked files.
    • If the repo has user changes, preserve the affected hunks and untracked targets with an appropriate patch, snapshot or scoped backup when the edit could destroy them. Avoid redundant copies of already protected targets.
    • If there is no git repo or the work involves generated assets, make a timestamped local backup of the files or folders you will touch.
  3. Explain planned edits before changing files.

    • List the main files or directories you expect to edit.
    • Call out any deletion, move, or overwrite.
    • A clear task instruction authorizes routine in-scope edits regardless of its verbs. Ask only for a materially ambiguous destructive target or another genuinely missing authorization.
  4. Edit narrowly.

    • Avoid unrelated refactors.
    • Do not revert user changes unless explicitly requested.
    • Prefer additive changes when the risk is unclear.
  5. Report the restore path.

    • Branch name, backup path, or commit/checkpoint strategy.
    • Commands or steps needed to undo your work.

Restore Guidance

For git-backed work, useful restore options include:

git status --short
git diff
git restore path/to/file
git switch main

Use destructive restore commands only when explicitly requested. Never run git reset --hard as a casual cleanup step.

For local backups, explain the backup folder and which files can be copied back.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Audit semantic and keyboard accessibility.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

Finish accessibility and performance details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

Evaluate agent and skill behavior or routing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

Design memory provenance and tenant isolation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

Resolve agent ownership and handoff design.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

Define coherent motion timing and rhythm.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

TheGoat395/Codex-Skills1292026年9月11日 更新

查看 TheGoat395 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题