Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write a client update — identify what was done, what's next, and surface risks before they become surprises. End of day, start of day, or end of week.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
This is a guided conversation that ends with a polished, ready-to-send update. Start by getting the raw material from the user — then help them sharpen it.
Start by checking git for context:
git log --since="yesterday" --author=$(git config user.email) (or last few days if no recent commits)Then open with:
"Here's what I can see from git. Before I help you write this — what did you actually spend your time on? Git doesn't always tell the full story."
Wait for their answer. Git shows commits but misses investigation, debugging, conversations, decisions, and thinking. Their answer fills the gaps.
Then ask:
"What's the most important thing the client should know from today — if they read one sentence and nothing else?"
Wait. This forces them to prioritise. Most updates bury the lead.
Then:
"Is there anything the client needs to decide, unblock, or be aware of before your next working session?"
Wait. This surfaces blockers and risks before they become surprises.
Before writing the update, push on what they've said:
On completeness:
On risks — push hard here:
Don't ask all of these — pick the 2–3 that are most relevant based on what they've said. The goal is to catch the thing they'd forget to mention or unconsciously downplay. Consultants instinctively soften risks in updates — push against that.
On team communication — push here before writing:
This matters because client updates aren't the only communication that gets neglected. Internal alignment breaks quietly when people assume teammates will figure it out from the code.
Produce a clean, ready-to-send update. Keep it short — clients don't read long updates. Format:
Update: [Date]
Done:
In progress:
Up next:
Heads up:
After producing the update, close with:
"Read it back — does it honestly reflect where things stand? Is there anything you softened that should be said more directly?"
Wait for their answer. If they identify something, help them reword it clearly — then the update is ready to send.
Efficient and honest. This isn't a ceremony — it's a communication tool. Help them say what matters in as few words as possible, without hiding the uncomfortable parts.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Explain what a piece of code does — a specific file, class, or method in close detail, or a user-facing flow as a concise system overview. What it does and why, not whether it's good.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have."
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Prepare to deliver difficult technical news to a client — a conversational prep session before the hard conversation happens
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Walk through the Designer/Developer wrap-up checklist for offboarding a client engagement — conversationally, one item at a time.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。