跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

workshop-style

Design hands-on workshops with short explanations, immediate exercises, and quick self-checks. Use brief dialogue between a teacher and an assistant to guide practice, then finish with a small project that combines what learners have tried.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Hands-on workshop — the learner works through the course instead of watching it, with an exercise or a check every couple of pages, short slides that only set up the next task, guiding narration that asks more than it tells, and a closing page where the pieces come together in one small project. Use when the ask is a workshop, a bootcamp session, 「动手」「实操」「练中学」「边做边学」, or a skill the learner is meant to leave holding; also use when the user names this style. Not for a systematic explanatory course (that is `lecture-style`) and not for occupational procedure training with tools and safety gates (that is `vocational`).

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Create a workshop built around hands-on practice
  • Turn long explanations into short briefs and exercises
  • Write guiding dialogue for a teacher and assistant
  • Finish a workshop with a small integrating project

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • outline-constraints.json1.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Workshop design

You are designing a workshop. Nothing is explained for longer than it takes to set up the next thing the learner does, and every idea is followed immediately by a page where they try it. The learner leaves having built something, not having been told about it.

stage-design still governs how the stage is built — outline, roster, one page per generate_scene, audio before done. This skill governs what the stage contains and how it sounds.

The shape

  • Scene 1 is a slide, and it is short: what the learner will have made by the end, and the first thing they are about to try. No agenda, no history of the field.
  • Every concept is followed at once by a hands-on page. The rhythm is concept → do it, concept → do it: roughly one interactive or quiz page for every two pages in the course. If two explanatory pages ever sit next to each other, one of them is unnecessary.
  • interactive pages are the exercises. Each isolates one thing to build, vary or trace. Consecutive interactive pages must not reuse the same widgetType — as the learner moves from trying to predicting to applying, the modality moves with them.
  • quiz pages are quick self-checks, not exams — placed right after a hands-on page to make the learner state what they just observed. Short, two or three questions.
  • The last page is a small integrating project: one interactive page whose task needs several of the workshop's pieces at once, with the earlier exercises as its parts. Not a summary slide. This is the page the learner screenshots afterwards.

Slides are task briefs

A slide in a workshop exists to make the next exercise possible. Keep it to two or three keyPoints — the rule, the shape, the one gotcha — and put everything else in the exercise. A workshop slide that could be read on its own as a lesson is too long: cut it and let the interactive page teach.

widgetOutline

Every interactive page must carry a populated widgetOutline, always including concept — the one thing this exercise is about. An interactive page with an empty widget outline degrades into a generic page, which in this style takes the course's whole point with it.

  • simulation: concept, keyVariables (the actual things the learner moves)
  • code: concept, language
  • diagram: concept, diagramType, nodes
  • game: concept, gameType, challenge, playerControls
  • visualization3d: concept, visualizationType, objects, interactions

keyPoints on an interactive page describe the task and what doing it reveals — what the learner changes, what they should notice, what conclusion that forces. Not facts to be read aloud.

Narration is facilitation

This is where the style is heard, so it is the part to get right.

  • Lines are short — one or two sentences. Nobody in a workshop listens to a paragraph while a task is waiting on screen.
  • Ask more than you tell. Most narration lines on a hands-on page are questions or instructions: 「先把这个值调到最大,看看会发生什么」「你觉得下一步 会往哪边偏?」「试完再往下看。」 Statements are reserved for the moment after the learner has already seen the effect.
  • Hand the work over and get out of the way. Say what to do, then stop. A narration that explains the answer before the exercise runs has cancelled the exercise.
  • Two voices, in dialogue. The teacher sets the task; the assistant co-facilitator reacts, tries the wrong thing on the learner's behalf, or asks what everybody is wondering. Alternating short turns, not monologue.
  • Encouragement is fine and belongs after an attempt, tied to something specific — 「注意你刚才那一下,曲线立刻翻过去了」 rather than 「太棒了」.

The roster

The runtime allows exactly one teacher, so the dialogic pair is a lead teacher plus a co-facilitator assistant — not two teachers. Write the roster with set_roster: a hands-on practitioner who talks in tasks, an assistant who is warm, quick and unafraid to be wrong out loud, and keep the roster small enough that turns stay readable. Put 「short turns, question-first, encouraging」 in the personas and a lively pace in voiceDesign.delivery.

Carrying the style into the generators

There is no outline generator: you plan the course in the conversation, then call create_stage and one generate_scene per page with an explicit brief. Page content and narration are written by separate calls that see only the page's brief, the page content and the roster. So the style has to be carried there explicitly:

  • put the concept → exercise cadence and the closing project into each page's generate_scene brief;
  • put the two-voice facilitation manner into each persona of set_roster;
  • pass the narration directive for each page in generate_scene.materialFacts — e.g. 「旁白为引导式短句,一到两句一条,提问多于陈述」「本页先让学员动手, 结论留到操作之后」. Naming this skill in a prompt does nothing; only the text you place in those fields is seen.

Scene naming

Titles name what the learner does, in the imperative.

  • Good: 「把这段循环改成能跑的」「调参数,找出它崩掉的那一刻」「用今天的三块拼一个 能用的小工具」
  • Bad: 「循环的概念」「参数敏感性分析」「综合练习」

If the request is not a workshop

If the subject has nothing to practise — a historical narrative, an appreciation course, a body of knowledge the learner only needs to understand — say so in one sentence and use lecture-style instead. Bolting exercises onto a topic with no task produces busywork, which learners recognize faster than anything else.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Turn past classrooms and chat history into a reusable personal skill for course creation. It examines varied examples, checks recurring patterns and exceptions, and asks for corrections before saving instructions that reflect the user's workflow and quality expectations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing patterns across past course creation
  • Turning preferred workflows into reusable instructions
  • Checking inferred preferences against examples
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

Plan and build a connected series of lessons around learners’ experience and goals. After the user approves the complete lesson list, it creates lessons in order, checks continuity, and organizes them in one folder.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building a seven-day introductory Python course
  • Creating a four-week onboarding program
  • Turning book chapters into separate lessons
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

Design courses where learners explore ideas by changing parameters, following diagrams, running code, playing games, or inspecting 3D scenes. Each main page focuses on one mechanism or structure, with opening and closing pages framing the learning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Exploring how changing a parameter affects a system
  • Following a diagram to understand structure or flow
  • Learning an idea by modifying and running code
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

Create courses grounded in verified external facts, including recent developments, market data, product details, and scientific findings. It researches sources, records which evidence supports each claim, and carries those findings and uncertainties into page plans and content.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Creating a course about recent events or industry developments
  • Building lessons around verified market or policy data
  • Teaching product details or scientific findings with sources
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

Check important factual claims in courses or supplied content against available materials and authoritative sources. Review numbers, definitions, and contradictions, then receive a concise report with evidence and suggested corrections, or have generated course pages checked before delivery.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking facts in a completed course
  • Verifying important numbers and technical definitions
  • Finding contradictions between course pages
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

Build learning activities where learners explain an idea first, then improve their explanation through focused questions. Include plain language, checks on analogies, application to unfamiliar situations, and a record of remaining gaps and next goals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Learn a concept by explaining it in your own words
  • Turn existing materials into explanation-based activities
  • Test explanations without relying on technical terms
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1万2026年10月18日 更新

查看 THU-MAIC 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题